Failure to provide continuous access to appropriate mental health care
First to latest report 3 Feb 2015 — 12 Dec 2019
Reports that mention this concern
3
Times this concern has been raised
3
Stated actions linked to this concern
6
What this concern includes
Includes failures in mental health service access, assessment or acceptance arrangements that exclude or leave people without care because their presentation does not fit a psychiatric label, service remit or boundary between mental health organisations, including gaps between OSW and CMHT thresholds.
What is not included
Excludes generic mental health waiting-time, staffing or treatment-quality concerns where no service-boundary or diagnostic-acceptance gap is identified.
Excludes failures within a specific mental health referral, crisis, home-treatment or discharge pathway when that named pathway is the material unsafe condition.
Excludes cases where a person was appropriately assessed and offered suitable mental health care, but later treatment or follow-up was inadequate.
Excludes generic gaps in services for overlapping mental-health and complex needs unless the assertion specifically identifies exclusion or lack of access caused by diagnostic or organisational thresholds.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Department of Health and Social Care1
NHS Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly Integrated Care Board1
NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board1
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust1
Sheffield Children's Hospital1
Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
Integrated care board2
NHS trust2
Healthcare site1
Ministerial department1
Reports and published responses 3 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
Norfolk
Concerns raised1
Failure to accept patients whose mental state does not fit a psychiatric label
This report raised 6 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statements
No respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
South Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised1
Lack of urgent mental health service provision for 16- and 17-year-olds
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked responses
NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board
Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust
Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.6
NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board and Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust
Complete and approve the business case for the CAMHS Home Intensive Treatment Team.
NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board and Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust
Reconfigure the existing Sheffield Treatment and Recovery Service into a CAMHS Home Intensive Treatment Team for young people up to age 18.
NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board and Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust
Recruit nursing staff for the new CAMHS Home Intensive Treatment Team.
NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board and Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust
Establish a Mental Health Liaison Team supporting 0–18-year-olds attending designated emergency departments, with out-of-hours cover.
NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board and Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust
Implement the temporary care pathway change agreed with Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust.
Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust and Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Implement jointly approved policy arrangements providing out-of-hours emergency home treatment to eligible 16- and 17-year-olds requiring crisis intervention.
Cornwall
Concerns raised1
Failure of OSW and CMHT treatment thresholds to provide continuous service coverage
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statements
No respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.