Recurring concern
Failure to provide continuous access to appropriate mental health care
First reported 3 Feb 2015•Latest report 12 Dec 2019
What this concern includes
Includes failures in mental health service access, assessment or acceptance arrangements that exclude or leave people without care because their presentation does not fit a psychiatric label, service remit or boundary between mental health organisations, including gaps between OSW and CMHT thresholds.
Not included
- Excludes generic mental health waiting-time, staffing or treatment-quality concerns where no service-boundary or diagnostic-acceptance gap is identified.
- Excludes failures within a specific mental health referral, crisis, home-treatment or discharge pathway when that named pathway is the material unsafe condition.
- Excludes cases where a person was appropriately assessed and offered suitable mental health care, but later treatment or follow-up was inadequate.
- Excludes generic gaps in services for overlapping mental-health and complex needs unless the assertion specifically identifies exclusion or lack of access caused by diagnostic or organisational thresholds.
- Reports
- 3
- Individual concerns
- 3
- Date range
- 2015–2019
- Stated actions
- 6
Distinct published reports
A report can raise multiple concerns
First to latest report issue date
Described in published responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Concerns and responses across reports
Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to accept patients whose mental state does not fit a psychiatric label
This report raised 6 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
-
Concerns raised1
Lack of urgent mental health service provision for 16- and 17-year-olds
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.6
-
Action
Complete and approve the business case for the CAMHS Home Intensive Treatment Team.
Stated by NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board and Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust -
Action
Reconfigure the existing Sheffield Treatment and Recovery Service into a CAMHS Home Intensive Treatment Team for young people up to age 18.
Stated by NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board and Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust -
Action
Recruit nursing staff for the new CAMHS Home Intensive Treatment Team.
Stated by NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board and Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust
-
Action
Establish a Mental Health Liaison Team supporting 0–18-year-olds attending designated emergency departments, with out-of-hours cover.
Stated by NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board and Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust -
Action
Implement the temporary care pathway change agreed with Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust.
Stated by NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board and Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust -
Action
Implement jointly approved policy arrangements providing out-of-hours emergency home treatment to eligible 16- and 17-year-olds requiring crisis intervention.
Stated by Sheffield Children'S NHS Foundation Trust and Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
-
Concerns raised1
Failure of OSW and CMHT treatment thresholds to provide continuous service coverage
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Data last updated 7 September 2026