Recipient

British Board of Agrément

Pin Request correction

First report 29 Aug 2013•Latest report 29 Aug 2013

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Standards body. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from British Board of Agrément linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Gloucestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Martin Leslie Brown · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Martin Leslie Brown died of multiple injuries after skidding on a relayed road surface that was excessively slippery due to excess bitumen. The principal concern was that the BBA certificate for Milepave did not clearly specify its correct use, creating a risk that the product could be used inappropriately; the resurfacing work was also not carried out correctly and the fault was not recognised before the road reopened.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to British Board of Agrément; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clearly specify permitted road speed limits for Milepave use

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There may be a possible dispute as to the interpretation of BBA certificate number 06/H120 issued in respect of Milepave. (2) In para 3.1 of the certificate it suggests that the product can be used on roads with a posted speed limit of less than 40mph. The same paragraph refers to use on “rural roads” that may, of course, be subject to the national speed limit of 60 mph. (3) The certificate does not specify that the product should not be used on roads where the posted speed limit is greater than 40 mph. (4) My concern is that the correct use of the product Milepave is not clearly set out in the certificate and it may be used inappropriately because of the wording used in the certificate. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026