Recipient

LTE Group

First report 12 Mar 2018•Latest report 12 Mar 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Further-education college. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports: 1
Published responses: 0%
Concerns addressed: 0
Stated actions: 0

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found

0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from LTE Group linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

12 Mar2018
Manchester South
Concerns raised6
1. Lack of documentation setting out the rationale for suspension decisions
2. Failure to consider and discuss risk at meetings
3. Failure to retain notes of the meeting on 13th March
1. Lack of a clear approach to whistleblowers and support for them
2. Failure to consider risk factors and risk minimisation when deciding whether to suspend an employee
3. Failure to refer employees to or remind them of available support services
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements
No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
AI-generated summary

Leigh William Wilde · Prevention of Future Deaths report

This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

Report summary

Leigh William Wilde had raised concerns about issues at his workplace and was found suspended from a ligature at his home after being suspended from employment. Concerns included a lack of documentation and risk assessment relating to the suspension, no evidence of discussion of risk or referral to support services, and unclear approaches to whistleblowers and their support.

Read the report on judiciary.uk
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LTE Group; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Lack of documentation setting out the rationale for suspension decisions
Wider context from the report
“• Leigh William Wilde had been suspended from his employment shortly before his death. There was no supporting documentation to set out the rationale for the decision. There was no evidence of risk factors or how to minimise them being considered when deciding whether to suspend an employee under the company policy. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LTE Group; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to consider and discuss risk at meetings
Wider context from the report
“• There were no notes available for the meeting on 13th March or evidence of consideration/discussion of risk at that meeting. There was no evidence that he had been referred to or reminded of the support services available to him. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LTE Group; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to retain notes of the meeting on 13th March
Wider context from the report
“• There were no notes available for the meeting on 13th March or evidence of consideration/discussion of risk at that meeting. There was no evidence that he had been referred to or reminded of the support services available to him. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LTE Group; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Lack of a clear approach to whistleblowers and support for them
Wider context from the report
“• The approach of both LTE and IMI towards whistleblowers and support for them was unclear. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LTE Group; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to consider risk factors and risk minimisation when deciding whether to suspend an employee
Wider context from the report
“• Leigh William Wilde had been suspended from his employment shortly before his death. There was no supporting documentation to set out the rationale for the decision. There was no evidence of risk factors or how to minimise them being considered when deciding whether to suspend an employee under the company policy. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LTE Group; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to refer employees to or remind them of available support services
Wider context from the report
“• There were no notes available for the meeting on 13th March or evidence of consideration/discussion of risk at that meeting. There was no evidence that he had been referred to or reminded of the support services available to him. ”
Open source report

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026

Reports, concerns and published responses

Reports over time

Concerns raised6

Lack of documentation setting out the rationale for suspension decisions

Failure to consider and discuss risk at meetings

Failure to retain notes of the meeting on 13th March

Lack of a clear approach to whistleblowers and support for them

Failure to consider risk factors and risk minimisation when deciding whether to suspend an employee

Failure to refer employees to or remind them of available support services