Recipient

Taycare Medical Limited

First report 26 Jul 2019•Latest report 26 Jul 2019

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
2

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
2stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Taycare Medical Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Gladys May Sayles · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gladys May Sayles was found collapsed after an unwitnessed fall at home and sustained fractures to her C2 and C3 vertebrae. She later received palliative treatment at Overgate Hospice and died there; concerns were identified about guidance, training and communication concerning the use and fitting of her hard collar.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Taycare Medical Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate guidelines for the use of Aspen collars

    Wider context from the report

    “• To review the existing guidelines with respect to the use of Aspen collars. • To review training with respect to the application and fixing of the collar in order to make it bespoke to the patient's needs. • To consider the effectiveness of the existing communications between Leeds General neurological unit, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary and the suppliers of the collar's with respect to the fitting of the collar and patients general care. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Taycare Medical Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate training for applying and fixing collars to patients' needs

    Wider context from the report

    “• To review the existing guidelines with respect to the use of Aspen collars. • To review training with respect to the application and fixing of the collar in order to make it bespoke to the patient's needs. • To consider the effectiveness of the existing communications between Leeds General neurological unit, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary and the suppliers of the collar's with respect to the fitting of the collar and patients general care. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Taycare Medical Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ineffective communications about collar fitting and patients' general care

    Wider context from the report

    “• To review the existing guidelines with respect to the use of Aspen collars. • To review training with respect to the application and fixing of the collar in order to make it bespoke to the patient's needs. • To consider the effectiveness of the existing communications between Leeds General neurological unit, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary and the suppliers of the collar's with respect to the fitting of the collar and patients general care. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain qualified orthotist training, probationary mentoring and mock fittings to assess competence in Aspen-collar application and fixing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To be an orthotist you need a recognised qualification from a national body called, The British Association of Prosthetists and Orthotists (BAPO). To gain this qualification you have to complete and pass a 3 year specialist course run by one of two universities – Salford and Strathclyde. During the course of that qualification the orthotist learns how fit hard collars. The BAPO website (www.bapo.com) gives further details, and confirms that:”

    Source location

    2019-0253-Responses
    Page 5 · response
    Published 9 September 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Supply each Aspen collar with applicable manufacturer instructions and leave those instructions with the patient after fitting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Guidelines in terms of the fitting of the collar are provided by the manufacturer. I enclose instruction sheets for the Aspen Collar and Aspen Vista Collar. These are the guidelines we follow.”

    Source location

    2019-0253-Responses
    Page 5 · response
    Published 9 September 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    TayCare follows manufacturer fitting guidelines and does not create clinical guidelines; treating doctors decide whether an Aspen collar is used.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. To review the existing guideline with respect to use of Aspen collars.”

    Source location

    2019-0253-Responses
    Page 4 · response
    Published 9 September 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    TayCare has no authority to order, arrange or provide training for NHS staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “TayCare has no power to order, arrange or give training to NHS Staff.”

    Source location

    2019-0253-Responses
    Page 6 · response
    Published 9 September 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Manufacturer instructions and qualified orthotists are considered sufficient to achieve appropriate patient-specific collar fitting and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Aspen collars are an off the shelf product. There is no bespoke element to their construction and TayCare is not involved with their construction.”

    Source location

    2019-0253-Responses
    Page 5 · response
    Published 9 September 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026