PFD report

Thomas Josef Green · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Feb 2017•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to consider and action referrals to Adult General Psychiatry
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable mental health referral pathways
  2. Lack of commissioned services for complex PTSD and complex presentations
  3. Insufficient detail in GP referral documentation to identify case complexity
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient detail in referrals for safe risk assessment and prioritisationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable mental health referral pathways
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Clarify the Individual Funding Request process and brief Pennine Care staff on applying for extraordinary care funding.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 March 2017.
  2. Action

    Review and establish clear mental-health support pathways for people with complex needs, identify gaps, and take findings forward in commissioning intentions.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 March 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    A dedicated Complex PTSD service is not commissioned because the existing Individual Funding Request process can provide extraordinary individual care packages.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider and action referrals to Adult General Psychiatry

Wider context from the report

“1. It was unclear why a referral was made to Adult General Psychiatry whilst Mr Green remained an inpatient, there was no evidence that this referral was ever considered or actioned. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of commissioned services for complex PTSD and complex presentations

Wider context from the report

“5. The Court heard evidence that there is a commissioning gap for the provision of services for Complex PTSD and complex presentations such as that of Mr Green. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient detail in GP referral documentation to identify case complexity

Wider context from the report

“4. The Court heard evidence that the referral document completed by the GP was not particularly detailed and therefore the complexity of the case was not apparent and the case was accepted. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient detail in referrals for safe risk assessment and prioritisation; Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of treatment plans addressing complex PTSD

Wider context from the report

“2. Hence when Mr Green was discharged from hospital there was no psychiatric follow-up and no treatment plan in place to address the diagnosis of complex PTSD. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide trauma-informed hospital care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inappropriate referral of complex PTSD presentations to Healthy Minds

Wider context from the report

“3. When a referral was made this was made to Healthy Minds. The Court heard evidence how this was not a case which was suitable for Healthy Minds as it was complex and involved potentially complex PTSD. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of psychiatric follow-up after hospital discharge

Wider context from the report

“2. Hence when Mr Green was discharged from hospital there was no psychiatric follow-up and no treatment plan in place to address the diagnosis of complex PTSD. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge; Failure to provide timely continuing mental health reviews and follow-up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Clarify the Individual Funding Request process and brief Pennine Care staff on applying for extraordinary care funding.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The CCG will clarify the Individual Funding Request process to ensure that, where required, Pennine Care staff can apply for individual funding for extraordinary care, e.g. for Complex PTSD and ensure that PCFT staff are fully briefed about the process by 1/6/17.”

Source location

2017-0057-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-CCG-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and establish clear mental-health support pathways for people with complex needs, identify gaps, and take findings forward in commissioning intentions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The CCG will work with PCFT and GPs to review and establish clear pathways into MH support for people with complex needs. This will identify any gaps which will be taken forward within commissioning intentions. We have commenced this work already and aim to conclude it within four months.”

Source location

2017-0057-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-CCG-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A dedicated Complex PTSD service is not commissioned because the existing Individual Funding Request process can provide extraordinary individual care packages.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although we do not commission a Complex PTSD service, we do have an Individual Funding Request process, where extraordinary packages are commissioned for individuals. This would have been appropriate for Mr Green had it been used.”

Source location

2017-0057-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-CCG-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Use Healthwatch findings to extend understanding of mental-health services and inform service improvement.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 March 2017.
  2. 2

    Seek assurance through bi-monthly contract monitoring that Pennine Care delivers its serious-incident action plan.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 March 2017.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use Healthwatch findings to extend understanding of mental-health services and inform service improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are committed to learning from this case and will continue to work with Pennine Care Foundation Trust, GPs and other staff working in neighbourhoods to improve patient pathways and ensure swift and easy access to more specialised support when required. The findings from a recent Healthwatch report, rich in service user experience, is also being used to extend our understanding of mental health services.”

Source location

2017-0057-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-CCG-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Seek assurance through bi-monthly contract monitoring that Pennine Care delivers its serious-incident action plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. The CCG will also seek assurance from PCFT that they deliver their action plan regarding this serious incident through our bi-monthly contract monitoring meeting.”

Source location

2017-0057-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-CCG-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026