PFD report

Jordan Ryan Sheils · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Oct 2018•West Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Unavailability of prominently displayed CCTV cameras overlooking the bridge
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems
  2. Delay in implementing anti-climbing mesh at the location
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate physical barriers preventing access to dangerous drops or areas
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Complete feasibility, CCTV coverage and temporary fencing reviews for North Bridge safety measures.

    Stated by Calderdale Borough CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 February 2019.
  2. Action

    Finalize drawings for the preferred anti-climb mesh and steeple coping option.

    Stated by Calderdale Borough CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 February 2019.
  3. Action

    Install an additional CCTV camera providing coverage of North Bridge.

    Stated by Calderdale Borough CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 February 2019.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of prominently displayed CCTV cameras overlooking the bridge

Wider context from the report

“During the inquest I heard very helpful evidence from ████████, Highway Asset Manager, who told me that the council are currently in the process of considering of obtaining planning permission for anti-climbing mesh at the location, although it is not thought it will be implemented until early next year. • To review the existing measures for deterring such tragedies with a view to expediting their introduction particularly with regard to prominently displayed CCTV cameras overlooking the bridge. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delay in implementing anti-climbing mesh at the location

Wider context from the report

“During the inquest I heard very helpful evidence from ████████, Highway Asset Manager, who told me that the council are currently in the process of considering of obtaining planning permission for anti-climbing mesh at the location, although it is not thought it will be implemented until early next year. • To review the existing measures for deterring such tragedies with a view to expediting their introduction particularly with regard to prominently displayed CCTV cameras overlooking the bridge. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate physical barriers preventing access to dangerous drops or areas.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete feasibility, CCTV coverage and temporary fencing reviews for North Bridge safety measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.1 To review existing measures for deterring such tragedies with a view to expediting their introduction particularly with regard to prominently displayed CCTV cameras overlooking the bridge”

Source location

2018-0319-Response-by-Calderdale-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 24 February 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Finalize drawings for the preferred anti-climb mesh and steeple coping option.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.2 A report was submitted to Calderdale Council’s Cabinet on 30th July 2018 outlining the installation of anti-climb mesh affixed to horizontal rails to cover the cut outs in the parapet and a steeple coping to cover the castellated top of the existing parapet providing a 1.45m unclimbable parapet (which would comply with current Design Manual for Roads and Bridges standards). A similar methodology was implemented on Hebble Viaduct which carries the A58 over North Bridge as a suicide prevention measure in 2010.”

Source location

2018-0319-Response-by-Calderdale-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 24 February 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install an additional CCTV camera providing coverage of North Bridge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.3 Provision of CCTV camera”

Source location

2018-0319-Response-by-Calderdale-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 24 February 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Obtain Cabinet approval for planning and listed-building applications and make funding available for the preferred option.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The following resolutions were passed:”

Source location

2018-0319-Response-by-Calderdale-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 24 February 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Submit and progress planning and listed-building consent applications for the anti-climb mesh and steeple coping works.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• That an application for listed building consent and an application for planning permission for the preferred option described at paragraph 5.3 (anti climb mesh and steeple coping) is submitted to the Local Planning Authority;”

Source location

2018-0319-Response-by-Calderdale-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 24 February 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prepare the contract and tender process for the North Bridge anti-climb works.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.3 A Planning and Listed Building Consent application was submitted on the 5th October 2018, upon approval the works will be tendered and is currently pending approval.”

Source location

2018-0319-Response-by-Calderdale-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 24 February 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Establish and operate a Calderdale-wide multi-agency suicide prevention group and review the prevention plan with partners.

    Stated by Calderdale Borough CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 February 2019.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Temporary fencing is not suitable because freestanding fencing would not prevent access to the existing parapet.

    Stated by Calderdale Borough CouncilUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish and operate a Calderdale-wide multi-agency suicide prevention group and review the prevention plan with partners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5.1 A Calderdale wide multi-agency group was established in 2016 following the completion of a Calderdale suicide audit. A target of reducing suicides to zero in Calderdale has been set; more challenging than the national ambition to reduce suicides by 10% by 2020.”

Source location

2018-0319-Response-by-Calderdale-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 24 February 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Temporary fencing is not suitable because freestanding fencing would not prevent access to the existing parapet.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.4 Provision of Temporary Heras Fencing”

Source location

2018-0319-Response-by-Calderdale-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 24 February 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026