PFD report

Mark Anthony McKessy · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Oct 2023•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Poor communication and information sharing between agencies
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures
  2. Lack of recognition of the interrelationship between health, social care, learning disability and capacity needs
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to integrate complex health and social care needs
  3. Limited Care Act assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Untimely or incomplete community care assessments
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Introduce peer discussions so managers oversee individual social-care assessments and reviews and strengthen social-work practice.

    Stated by One Stockport Health and Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 October 2023.
  2. Action

    Hold a joint learning event involving agencies supporting people with learning disabilities to strengthen information sharing and practice.

    Stated by One Stockport Health and Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 October 2023.
  3. Action

    Review the health and social-care offer, including assessment, advice, signposting, substance-misuse support, information and staff training needs, through standing quality-meeting consideration.

    Stated by One Stockport Health and Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 October 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust cannot directly access patients’ full clinical histories through current systems.

    Stated by One Stockport Health and Care BoardUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Poor communication and information sharing between agencies

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard evidence that he had significant leaning difficulties and his capacity was limited. He was known to agencies. Despite this the inquest heard evidence that steps to reduce the risks were not taken due to: 1. Poor communication/information sharing between agencies which meant that there was no coordination of care and no clear overview of his needs; and 2. A lack of recognition by agencies involved with him of his health issues and their inter relationship with his social care and learning disability needs including the extent to which he had capacity. This was compounded by limited Care Act assessments ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care; Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of recognition of the interrelationship between health, social care, learning disability and capacity needs

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard evidence that he had significant leaning difficulties and his capacity was limited. He was known to agencies. Despite this the inquest heard evidence that steps to reduce the risks were not taken due to: 1. Poor communication/information sharing between agencies which meant that there was no coordination of care and no clear overview of his needs; and 2. A lack of recognition by agencies involved with him of his health issues and their inter relationship with his social care and learning disability needs including the extent to which he had capacity. This was compounded by limited Care Act assessments ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to integrate complex health and social care needs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited Care Act assessments

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard evidence that he had significant leaning difficulties and his capacity was limited. He was known to agencies. Despite this the inquest heard evidence that steps to reduce the risks were not taken due to: 1. Poor communication/information sharing between agencies which meant that there was no coordination of care and no clear overview of his needs; and 2. A lack of recognition by agencies involved with him of his health issues and their inter relationship with his social care and learning disability needs including the extent to which he had capacity. This was compounded by limited Care Act assessments ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Untimely or incomplete community care assessments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce peer discussions so managers oversee individual social-care assessments and reviews and strengthen social-work practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We continue to improve front line practice to ensure our frontline teams increase their knowledge and confidence in completing holistic assessments. To ensure management oversee individual assessments and reviews we are introducing peer discussions to strengthen social work practice. The social care and specialist learning disability health team are co-located to support a joined-up approach to interventions. This is further supported by managers across social care and health meeting on a weekly basis, using the forum to refer individuals for a multi-disciplinary and multi-agency approach.”

Source location

Response from Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold a joint learning event involving agencies supporting people with learning disabilities to strengthen information sharing and practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There will be a joint learning event in January 2024 in relation to Mr McKessy’s life and death. All the agencies involved in supporting people with a learning disability in Stockport will be in attendance and agree a joint action plan to further strengthen information sharing and improvements to practice. We will also liaise with Mr McKessy’s family, if they wish to be involved, to share their experiences of the health and social care”

Source location

Response from Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the health and social-care offer, including assessment, advice, signposting, substance-misuse support, information and staff training needs, through standing quality-meeting consideration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following Mr McKessy’s passing, analysis of our current offer, from both social care and health is being considered, including how we carry out assessments, provide advice, our signposting for individuals and our support provided people who experience any element of substance mis-use. This will be a standing agenda at the PCFT Quality Meetings; this will support consideration to further information or training for staff is required, whether we have appropriate information and resources to share with individuals and/or their carers.”

Source location

Response from Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve frontline knowledge and confidence in completing holistic social-care assessments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We recognise there were missed opportunities at this time to fully understand his situation and the impact of drinking on his health and social care needs.”

Source location

Response from Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Agree a joint action plan following the learning event to improve information sharing and practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There will be a joint learning event in January 2024 in relation to Mr McKessy’s life and death. All the agencies involved in supporting people with a learning disability in Stockport will be in attendance and agree a joint action plan to further strengthen information sharing and improvements to practice. We will also liaise with Mr McKessy’s family, if they wish to be involved, to share their experiences of the health and social care”

Source location

Response from Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust cannot directly access patients’ full clinical histories through current systems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All Stockport GPs use the Emis Clinical system, including our community and out of hours services. This means that community and out of hours services directly accessing individual patient clinical records. At the current time, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust cannot directly access a patient’s full clinical history. I can confirm that there is ongoing work within Greater Manchester to extend sharing of information across healthcare services.”

Source location

Response from Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Develop service-user and carer feedback through a questionnaire to inform adaptation of the annual health-check support offer.

    Stated by One Stockport Health and Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 October 2023.
  2. 2

    Support annual learning disability health checks through newly appointed primary care assistant practitioners and monitor register accuracy, uptake and completion.

    Stated by One Stockport Health and Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 October 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop service-user and carer feedback through a questionnaire to inform adaptation of the annual health-check support offer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The NHS provider, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (PCFT) have recently appointed a team of five Primary Care Practitioners, one per borough; their role will be around supporting the offer and uptake of annual health checks (AHC) for people with a learning disability. The team are currently reviewing data to understand whether the registers include the right people who are eligible to receive AHC’s and the offer and uptake of AHC’s. They are looking at what the data tells us in relation to GP practices and numbers of service users but also demographics such as gender, age and ethnicity to identify where we may need to increase awareness and engagement with specific-groups and where we may need to prioritise support to practices where there may be lower uptake.”

Source location

Response from Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support annual learning disability health checks through newly appointed primary care assistant practitioners and monitor register accuracy, uptake and completion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This role has supported the uptake of the Learning Disability Annual Health Checks with a completion rate of 92.4% for 2022/2023 and a current rolling 12-month performance of 88.3%. The monitoring of the learning disability registers and ongoing support around annual health checks in the future will be undertaken by the new primary care assistant practitioners. Performance will be monitored in locality primary care teams to ensure quality and completion and is reported through to The Greater Manchester ICS.”

Source location

Response from Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026