PFD report

June Evelyn Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Oct 2017•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to staff wards at correct staffing levels
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity
  2. Failure to implement prescribed nutritional advice
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate management of patients' nutrition and hydration needs
  3. Delay in informing treating clinicians about hospital-acquired grade 3 pressure sores
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate management of pressure ulcers
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to staff wards at correct staffing levels

Wider context from the report

“4. Mrs Evans was nursed on 3 wards from the 4th to the 30th June. The wards were not staffed according to the levels identified as correct staffing levels by the hospital which detracted from the ability of the nursing staff to undertake the tasks required to protect Mrs Evans from pressure sores and ensure she received adequate nourishment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to implement prescribed nutritional advice

Wider context from the report

“3. Dietician’s advice in respect of the quantity of nutrition required by Mrs Evans was not implemented by the nursing staff. Naso- gastric feeding was advised by both the treating doctor and the dietician on the 14th June 2016. This advice was not followed and there was no evidence of why this did not occur. Mrs Evans was not provided with adequate nutrition. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate management of patients' nutrition and hydration needs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delay in informing treating clinicians about hospital-acquired grade 3 pressure sores

Wider context from the report

“2. The treating clinicians were unaware that Mrs Evans had developed a grade 3 hospital acquired pressure sore, noted on the 8th June 2016, until the 15th June 2016. They were therefore unable to make informed decisions as to her treatment, including the antibiotic regime to be followed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate management of pressure ulcers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to refer hospital-acquired grade 3 pressure sores to the tissue viability nurse

Wider context from the report

“1. The evidence showed that failure to refer the hospital acquired grade 3 pressure sore to the tissue viability nurse on the 8th June 2016 was as a result of the employment of an agency nurse who was unfamiliar with the Trust’s Policy on the Prevention of Pressure Sores. If the referral had been made to the tissue viability nurse on the 8th June 2016 it would not have deteriorated as it did. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate management of pressure ulcers; Unreliable referrals to tissue viability services.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.