PFD report

Kristian Edward Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 May 2026•West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
15

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Delays in contacting 999 and the on-call doctor during cardiac arrests
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to initiate 999 calls promptly when life is at riskPart of recurring concern: Unreliable contact arrangements for urgent clinical advicePart of recurring concern: Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest
  2. Inability of staff to perform CPR properly
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest
  3. Failure to coordinate cardiac-arrest responses
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective communication during medical emergenciesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable emergency response to patient collapsePart of recurring concern: Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. Action

    Deliver regular unannounced emergency simulation training to strengthen staff confidence and response to cardiac arrest and opioid overdose.

    Stated by SPFTStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 June 2026.
  2. Action

    Develop a structured ward-level improvement plan to clarify responsibilities, improve documentation and track actions through to completion.

    Stated by SPFTStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 22 June 2026.
  3. Action

    Provide bespoke section 17 leave training, including learning from Kristian Allen’s inquest.

    Stated by SPFTStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 22 June 2026.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing Trust actions embedded in policy, training, governance and ward-level processes are considered sufficient; no further new actions are needed.

    Stated by SPFTExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in contacting 999 and the on-call doctor during cardiac arrests

Wider context from the report

“I am also concerned that staff are not properly able to deal with cardiac arrests in acute mental health wards. In Kristian’s inquest, evidence was heard that the response to Kristian’s arrest was chaotic and disorganised. Nobody appeared to be in charge, staff were unable to do CPR properly, the 999 call was of a poor standard, there were considerable delays in contacting 999 and the on call doctor and the staff did not have Naloxone training. I had the same issues in an Inquest I did nine months ago in the exact same ward, indeed in the neighbouring room. The fact that the same set of facts have repeated themselves in Kristian’s case leads me to a very real concern that future deaths will happen if action is not taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to initiate 999 calls promptly when life is at risk; Unreliable contact arrangements for urgent clinical advice; Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inability of staff to perform CPR properly

Wider context from the report

“I am also concerned that staff are not properly able to deal with cardiac arrests in acute mental health wards. In Kristian’s inquest, evidence was heard that the response to Kristian’s arrest was chaotic and disorganised. Nobody appeared to be in charge, staff were unable to do CPR properly, the 999 call was of a poor standard, there were considerable delays in contacting 999 and the on call doctor and the staff did not have Naloxone training. I had the same issues in an Inquest I did nine months ago in the exact same ward, indeed in the neighbouring room. The fact that the same set of facts have repeated themselves in Kristian’s case leads me to a very real concern that future deaths will happen if action is not taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to coordinate cardiac-arrest responses

Wider context from the report

“I am also concerned that staff are not properly able to deal with cardiac arrests in acute mental health wards. In Kristian’s inquest, evidence was heard that the response to Kristian’s arrest was chaotic and disorganised. Nobody appeared to be in charge, staff were unable to do CPR properly, the 999 call was of a poor standard, there were considerable delays in contacting 999 and the on call doctor and the staff did not have Naloxone training. I had the same issues in an Inquest I did nine months ago in the exact same ward, indeed in the neighbouring room. The fact that the same set of facts have repeated themselves in Kristian’s case leads me to a very real concern that future deaths will happen if action is not taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective communication during medical emergencies; Unreliable emergency response to patient collapse; Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make an adequate 999 call during cardiac arrests

Wider context from the report

“I am also concerned that staff are not properly able to deal with cardiac arrests in acute mental health wards. In Kristian’s inquest, evidence was heard that the response to Kristian’s arrest was chaotic and disorganised. Nobody appeared to be in charge, staff were unable to do CPR properly, the 999 call was of a poor standard, there were considerable delays in contacting 999 and the on call doctor and the staff did not have Naloxone training. I had the same issues in an Inquest I did nine months ago in the exact same ward, indeed in the neighbouring room. The fact that the same set of facts have repeated themselves in Kristian’s case leads me to a very real concern that future deaths will happen if action is not taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of Naloxone training for staff

Wider context from the report

“I am also concerned that staff are not properly able to deal with cardiac arrests in acute mental health wards. In Kristian’s inquest, evidence was heard that the response to Kristian’s arrest was chaotic and disorganised. Nobody appeared to be in charge, staff were unable to do CPR properly, the 999 call was of a poor standard, there were considerable delays in contacting 999 and the on call doctor and the staff did not have Naloxone training. I had the same issues in an Inquest I did nine months ago in the exact same ward, indeed in the neighbouring room. The fact that the same set of facts have repeated themselves in Kristian’s case leads me to a very real concern that future deaths will happen if action is not taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of nursing staff to know leave conditions

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that s17 leave is being authorised by staff in ignorance of the leave conditions. In this particular case, the responsible clinician granted leave on the 13th of February 2025, a condition being that Kristian had to test negative for drug use before leave was allowed. On the 15th of February 2025, the nurse in charge granted escorted leave despite Kristian having tested positive for cocaine use. He was unaware of the restrictions on Kristian’s leave. Evidence was heard during the Inquest that this was a frequent problem and I am concerned that nursing staff are unaware of leave conditions and this is not being properly monitored. This runs a risk of future fatalities if leave is being granted inappropriately. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to properly monitor leave conditions

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that s17 leave is being authorised by staff in ignorance of the leave conditions. In this particular case, the responsible clinician granted leave on the 13th of February 2025, a condition being that Kristian had to test negative for drug use before leave was allowed. On the 15th of February 2025, the nurse in charge granted escorted leave despite Kristian having tested positive for cocaine use. He was unaware of the restrictions on Kristian’s leave. Evidence was heard during the Inquest that this was a frequent problem and I am concerned that nursing staff are unaware of leave conditions and this is not being properly monitored. This runs a risk of future fatalities if leave is being granted inappropriately. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver regular unannounced emergency simulation training to strengthen staff confidence and response to cardiac arrest and opioid overdose.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response to cardiac arrest I appreciate your concern in relation to staff not being properly able to deal with cardiac arrests. You will have heard how this was recognised within the Trust's PSII and the need to strengthen preparedness and response to medical emergencies, including opioid overdose, resulted in recommended action. The identified action was the need to increase staff confidence in administering Immediate Life Support (ILS). I am informed that the Inquest heard of the impact upon staff of conducting ILS and how their confidence can be impacted by the rarity of having to conduct ILS. I confirm, as you heard, that as a direct action from the PSII into Kristian's death the Trust introduced regular simulation training ie: unannounced emergency simulations to which staff then have to respond.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a structured ward-level improvement plan to clarify responsibilities, improve documentation and track actions through to completion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, Mill View Hospital, as a whole, have been subject to external review by recognised specialist consultants in organisational performance and service improvement. Their work has focused on strengthening ward-level processes and operational consistency, including clarifying roles and responsibilities, improving documentation standards, and ensuring that actions agreed in MDTs and reviews are clearly recorded, owned and followed through. This has supported the development of a structured ward-level improvement plan, enabling learning, including from PSIIs, to be translated into consistent day-to-day practice and more reliable delivery of care processes.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide bespoke section 17 leave training, including learning from Kristian Allen’s inquest.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, compliance is now consistently monitored via matrons, ward managers and governance processes to ensure high quality s.17 leave understanding is maintained. Furthermore, as you heard, the Trust has a programme of audits which specifically include checking legal compliance with s.17 leave conditions. The audits give rise to actions which are then overseen. Also, at ward-level re-enforcement of expected standards is now done routinely through team meetings, safety discussions and MDT processes. Further, as you heard from ████████, bespoke training is being provided to staff on s.17 leave and, notably, the outcome from Kristian's Inquest will be specifically included in that training session which is schedule for next week.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reinforce section 17 leave standards through team meetings, safety discussions and multidisciplinary team processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, compliance is now consistently monitored via matrons, ward managers and governance processes to ensure high quality s.17 leave understanding is maintained. Furthermore, as you heard, the Trust has a programme of audits which specifically include checking legal compliance with s.17 leave conditions. The audits give rise to actions which are then overseen. Also, at ward-level re-enforcement of expected standards is now done routinely through team meetings, safety discussions and MDT processes. Further, as you heard from ████████, bespoke training is being provided to staff on s.17 leave and, notably, the outcome from Kristian's Inquest will be specifically included in that training session which is schedule for next week.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor and audit compliance with section 17 leave conditions through matrons, ward managers and governance processes, with resulting actions overseen.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, compliance is now consistently monitored via matrons, ward managers and governance processes to ensure high quality s.17 leave understanding is maintained. Furthermore, as you heard, the Trust has a programme of audits which specifically include checking legal compliance with s.17 leave conditions. The audits give rise to actions which are then overseen. Also, at ward-level re-enforcement of expected standards is now done routinely through team meetings, safety discussions and MDT processes. Further, as you heard from ████████, bespoke training is being provided to staff on s.17 leave and, notably, the outcome from Kristian's Inquest will be specifically included in that training session which is schedule for next week.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Test and retest nursing staff competency in understanding and complying with section 17 leave conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Authorisation of s17 leave As you heard during the Inquest, the conditions of s.17 leave are documented in a patient's electronic clinical record on the specific s.17 leave form and I understand that that was done for Kristian. However, I know that the nursing staff did not comply with the conditions despite them being clearly on Kristian's electronic record. This non-compliance was highlighted within the Trust's PSII report. I confirm, as you heard in evidence, that the Trust has already taken action to address this. Specifically, nursing staff's understanding of s.17 leave and the requirement to comply with conditions is tested though the use of competency tests. I am informed that ████████ (Clinical Director) gave evidence at the Inquest to explain that a staff member's competency is re-tested until they can satisfactorily show their depth of understanding.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce automated external defibrillators providing real-time CPR feedback and use them in staff training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is recognised that simulation training enables staff to develop their confidence beyond the basic level of skills and confidence achieved via the already existing mandatory ILS training. Additionally, as you heard, the Trust has now introduced new Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) to support staff. These new AEDs give real-time information to the staff conducting CPR to inform them as to whether their rate and depth of CPR application is appropriate, thereby supporting staff to deliver high-quality CPR in line with guidelines. These new AEDs are also used in training to enable the nurses to see if those they are training are conducting CPR as optimally as possible.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the Resus policy to require monthly clinical and non-clinical emergency simulations across inpatient hospitals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you also heard in evidence the Trust's Resus policy has been updated to formalise the inclusion of simulation as standard in both clinical and non-clinical areas to enhance and embed medical emergency and cardiac arrest training, thereby ensuring staff remain competent and confident with emergency processes and procedures. The policy stipulates that simulations will be completed monthly throughout SPFT in inpatient hospitals. As ████████ informed you, the most recent simulation on Kristian's ward took place on 20th May, involving 8 staff and simulated a scenario of an opioid overdose leading to cardiac arrest. I am informed that feedback from the ILS team was that the ward-team's response was well led.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing Trust actions embedded in policy, training, governance and ward-level processes are considered sufficient; no further new actions are needed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In summary, given the comprehensive range of actions already taken by the Trust there are no further new actions that I consider the Trust needs to take. That said, as I recognised above, all improvement requires sustained, committed focus. So, whilst I can already say that the actions described above are now embedded within policy, training, governance and ward-level quality improvement processes, which are subject to ongoing monitoring to ensure improvements continue, I would like to assure you that the oversight and focus on”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Appoint a Head of Nursing and Quality for Brighton and Hove Acute and Urgent Care services.

    Stated by SPFTStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 June 2026.
  2. 2

    Establish a fortnightly Quality Matters meeting to review safety, quality and improvement actions.

    Stated by SPFTStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 June 2026.
  3. 3

    Maintain an executive-led improvement plan with monthly Chief Nursing Officer oversight of Mill View Hospital.

    Stated by SPFTStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 22 June 2026.
  4. 4

    Issue fortnightly Patient Safety Learning Bulletins setting clinical practice expectations across services.

    Stated by SPFTStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 June 2026.
  5. 5

    Implement Culture of Care changes on Kristian Allen’s ward covering therapeutic activity, environment, patient involvement and consistency of care delivery.

    Stated by SPFTStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 June 2026.
  6. 6

    Establish a substantive consultant psychiatrist post on Kristian Allen’s ward.

    Stated by SPFTStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 June 2026.
  7. 7

    Discuss incident learning routinely in team meetings, supervision, multidisciplinary teams and safety huddles.

    Stated by SPFTStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 June 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Appoint a Head of Nursing and Quality for Brighton and Hove Acute and Urgent Care services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Newly appointed Head of Nursing and Quality for Acute & Urgent Care services in Brighton and Hove”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a fortnightly Quality Matters meeting to review safety, quality and improvement actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In conjunction with the above, to ensure learning is embedded and sustained, at a divisional level, Brighton and Hove, has strengthened its governance and oversight, to ensure that learning from incidents is systematically reviewed, shared and translated into changes in practice, it now has:”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain an executive-led improvement plan with monthly Chief Nursing Officer oversight of Mill View Hospital.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I highlight this as I specifically note your reference, and therefore, understandable concern, about a previous death, which I understand was in May 2024, on the same ward. I also highlight because I recognise that the embedding of improvements within the complexities of mental healthcare services is multi-faceted in nature, takes time and committed, consistent re-enforcement. This is why, following Kristian's death, as a recommendation in the PSII we introduced the ongoing executive led improvement plan that you heard about at the Inquest and I will further explain to you once I have specifically addressed your two concerns.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue fortnightly Patient Safety Learning Bulletins setting clinical practice expectations across services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In conjunction with the above, to ensure learning is embedded and sustained, at a divisional level, Brighton and Hove, has strengthened its governance and oversight, to ensure that learning from incidents is systematically reviewed, shared and translated into changes in practice, it now has:”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement Culture of Care changes on Kristian Allen’s ward covering therapeutic activity, environment, patient involvement and consistency of care delivery.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can also confirm that the improvement plan for Kristian's ward is aligned with the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Culture of Care programme. This Culture of Care programme provides a framework for improving the quality, safety and”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a substantive consultant psychiatrist post on Kristian Allen’s ward.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Newly established substantive consultant psychiatrist on Kristian's ward”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss incident learning routinely in team meetings, supervision, multidisciplinary teams and safety huddles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In conjunction with the above, to ensure learning is embedded and sustained, at a divisional level, Brighton and Hove, has strengthened its governance and oversight, to ensure that learning from incidents is systematically reviewed, shared and translated into changes in practice, it now has:”

Source location

Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 22 June 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026