PFD report

Albert Thomas Bellingham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Mar 2026•North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of appropriate training for doctors working in care homes when dealing with pressure sores
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate management of pressure ulcers
  2. Lack of guidance supporting an interventionalist supervisory role when dealing with pressure sores
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate management of pressure ulcers
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    NHS England is responsible for addressing concerns about pressure sore guidance and training for doctors working in care homes.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of appropriate training for doctors working in care homes when dealing with pressure sores

Wider context from the report

“Consideration of guidance to support interventionalist, supervisory role with appropriate training for doctors working in care homes when dealing with pressure sore. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate management of pressure ulcers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance supporting an interventionalist supervisory role when dealing with pressure sores

Wider context from the report

“Consideration of guidance to support interventionalist, supervisory role with appropriate training for doctors working in care homes when dealing with pressure sore. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate management of pressure ulcers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England is responsible for addressing concerns about pressure sore guidance and training for doctors working in care homes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In considering your report, officials within the Department of Health and Social Care have made enquiries with NHS England and concluded that these concerns are more appropriately addressed by NHS England directly. I am advised that NHS England will therefore provide you with a full and comprehensive response on the concerns you have raised.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Routine pressure-ulcer assessment, treatment and dressing care ordinarily fall to appropriately trained nursing staff and other relevant clinicians, not GPs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The direct assessment and treatment of pressure ulcers, including routine wound care and dressing management, would ordinarily fall within the professional responsibilities of appropriately trained nursing staff and other relevant clinicians. GPs are not generally responsible for the delivery or supervision of routine dressing care; however, they remain responsible for providing medical care to their patients and may contribute to the assessment, management and escalation of the resident's underlying clinical condition where clinically appropriate.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 29 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing NICE guidance applies to doctors in care homes and provides the primary national framework for pressure-ulcer prevention and management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is currently no single, unified, accessible guidance document specifically addressed to doctors working in care home settings, that sets out the expected supervisory and interventionist role in relation to pressure ulcers. However, NICE Clinical Guideline CG179 ‘Pressure ulcers: prevention and management’ (2014, last updated in 2024) provides the primary national clinical framework for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers across all healthcare and social care settings, including care homes. The guideline applies to all registered professionals involved in patient care, including doctors, and covers:”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2026.
  2. 2

    Share learning and insights from Prevention of Future Deaths reports across NHS national and regional levels.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Mr Bellingham, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 4 · response
Published 29 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning and insights from Prevention of Future Deaths reports across NHS national and regional levels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Mr Bellingham, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 4 · response
Published 29 April 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026