PFD report

Jonathan Earp · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 May 2018•Gloucestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
11

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to account for and appropriately dispose of unsent fentanyl patches
  2. Failure to consider concurrent use of additional fentanyl and illicit medication and its effects
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to identify clinically significant medication risksPart of recurring concern: Inadequate safeguards against misuse of medicines with abuse potential
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Document transdermal patch removal and wastage, audit compliance, and provide feedback to ward staff.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  2. Action

    Check controlled drugs daily and document wastage by two qualified nurses.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  3. Action

    Establish opioid-user ward management guidelines covering prescribing advice and specialist input.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 July 2018.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to account for and appropriately dispose of unsent fentanyl patches

Wider context from the report

“I heard during the inquest that Mr Earp had been prescribed Fentanyl which was administered by way of transdermal patches. Mr Earp repeatedly requested additional patches however there was no evidence that all of the "unsent" patches had been returned to the nursing staff or appropriately discarded. The clinical staff believed that Mr Earp was accessing illicit drugs when he left the ward, however there was no evidence that staff considered that he may have been taking additional Fentanyl and illicit medication, and the effect this could have. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider concurrent use of additional fentanyl and illicit medication and its effects

Wider context from the report

“I heard during the inquest that Mr Earp had been prescribed Fentanyl which was administered by way of transdermal patches. Mr Earp repeatedly requested additional patches however there was no evidence that all of the "unsent" patches had been returned to the nursing staff or appropriately discarded. The clinical staff believed that Mr Earp was accessing illicit drugs when he left the ward, however there was no evidence that staff considered that he may have been taking additional Fentanyl and illicit medication, and the effect this could have. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to identify clinically significant medication risks; Inadequate safeguards against misuse of medicines with abuse potential.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Document transdermal patch removal and wastage, audit compliance, and provide feedback to ward staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Improve monitoring of transdermal patch and removal | 1. Document sign removal and wastage of transdermal patches in controlled drug book.”

Source location

2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Check controlled drugs daily and document wastage by two qualified nurses.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To check the controlled drugs daily | Check controlled drugs daily and document in controlled drug record book. Also to document all controlled drug wastage by two qualified nurses. | Ward Manager | July 2018 | Current practice”

Source location

2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish opioid-user ward management guidelines covering prescribing advice and specialist input.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Review policy and flowchart on “OPIOID USERS ON THE WARD – MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES” | These guidelines have been drawn up to advise doctors, nurses and pharmacists on managing patients who have an opioid pain management pathway, and to provide further advice on prescribing from the Acute Pain Management team and/or providers of the Drug dependency service. | Consultant for Acute Pain Management | July 2018 | Complete”

Source location

2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. 1

    Disseminate a safety briefing on lessons learned and prescribing advice to ward managers and department heads.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  2. 2

    Review behavioural and treatment contracts to specify expected treatment.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  3. 3

    Escalate lost or removed patch cases for Registrar medication review and prevent re-administration without medical review.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  4. 4

    Identify patients with potentially risky behaviours during each safety brief.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  5. 5

    Explore using behavioural and treatment contracts out of hours with the Security Adviser.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  6. 6

    Discuss relevant safety alerts and add them to TrackCare where appropriate.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  7. 7

    Maintain Quality Delivery Group oversight of the actions and their delivery.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  8. 8

    Review and standardise the drug chart.

    Stated by Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 July 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate a safety briefing on lessons learned and prescribing advice to ward managers and department heads.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Safety briefing developed to share all lessons learnt across the organisation to include reference to prescribing advice | Safety briefing to be sent to all ward managers and department heads to share with teams and at key meetings. | Director of Safety | July 2018 | Complete”

Source location

2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review behavioural and treatment contracts to specify expected treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Early identification of vulnerable service users at risk of risky behaviours | Review of behavioural contracts and treatment contracts, stating expected treatment. Explore the use out of hours with Security Advisor. | Matron Security Adviser | September 2018 | Planning”

Source location

2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Escalate lost or removed patch cases for Registrar medication review and prevent re-administration without medical review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Senior Doctor review of medication, should patches be lost or removed | To escalate to Registrar to review medication and consider re-prescribing. Patient not to be re-administered without medical review. | Unscheduled Care Consultant | September 2018 | Planning”

Source location

2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Identify patients with potentially risky behaviours during each safety brief.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Safety brief per shift | To identify at each safety brief patients with potential to have risky behaviours. | Ward Manager | July 2018 | Current practice”

Source location

2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore using behavioural and treatment contracts out of hours with the Security Adviser.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Early identification of vulnerable service users at risk of risky behaviours | Review of behavioural contracts and treatment contracts, stating expected treatment. Explore the use out of hours with Security Advisor. | Matron Security Adviser | September 2018 | Planning”

Source location

2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss relevant safety alerts and add them to TrackCare where appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Access of safety alerts identifying those at risk | Alerts to be discussed and added to Track Care if appropriate. | Matron Track Care Lead | September 2018 | Planning”

Source location

2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain Quality Delivery Group oversight of the actions and their delivery.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The enclosed Action Plan confirms the work which the Trust has undertaken, and continues to work on, as a result of Mr Earp’s death. The Trust Quality Delivery Group will maintain oversight of these actions and ensure they are being delivered.”

Source location

2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and standardise the drug chart.

Verbatim wording from the response

“AMD6 action card (PODPAM) | Review and standardise drug chart. | Pharmacist Lead | March 2018 | Complete”

Source location

2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026