Linda Louise Banks · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Dec 2023•County Durham and Darlington

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to effectively implement actions arising from thematic reviews
  2. Delays in implementing lessons and patient-safety improvements from serious incident investigations
  3. Delays in completing serious incident investigations
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Complete the outstanding training required under the Crisis Team improvement plan.

  2. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Operate the fully transitioned PSIRF arrangements, including the implemented InPhase incident-reporting system and associated processes.

  3. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Continue refining and embedding Durham and Darlington Crisis Team improvements through the overarching improvement plan.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    The PFD appears to arise from unrelated advice about a future investigation, not outstanding concerns from evidence heard at this inquest.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to effectively implement actions arising from thematic reviews

Wider context from the report

“(1) A thematic review completed in November 2021 had identified a number of significant issues in the functioning of mental health services, and many of the same issues were also identified in the serious incident review into Linda’s care and treatment, from February 2022 until her death. It is apparent that any actions taken as a result of the thematic review were not effective in implementing change and that the action plan was still a “work in progress” at the Pre Hearing Review Hearings which took place in this case in 2023. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in implementing lessons and patient-safety improvements from serious incident investigations

Wider context from the report

“(3) As previously reported the concern in relation to the delays in such investigations and any subsequent necessary action required, is twofold. Firstly, the quality of the investigation is severely compromised as the evidence is not captured when memories are fresh. Secondly, because any lessons to be learnt and improvements to be made to improve patient safety cannot be implemented promptly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in completing serious incident investigations

Wider context from the report

“(2) The Serious Incident Investigation into the care received by Linda was not completed until the end of January 2023, some 9 months after the death. This is neither timely nor responsive. Despite reassurances given that the Trust are working to eradicate such delays, in response to a series of previous PFD reports issued by the Coroners of Durham and Darlington, there are still cases coming to the attention of the Coronial service where Serious Incident Investigations are significantly delayed in excess of the 60 day NHS framework. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations; Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to preserve evidence while memories are fresh during serious incident investigations

Wider context from the report

“(3) As previously reported the concern in relation to the delays in such investigations and any subsequent necessary action required, is twofold. Firstly, the quality of the investigation is severely compromised as the evidence is not captured when memories are fresh. Secondly, because any lessons to be learnt and improvements to be made to improve patient safety cannot be implemented promptly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations; Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the outstanding training required under the Crisis Team improvement plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As advised at the inquest, the action plan for the thematic review was reviewed and incorporated into a larger overarching improvement plan for the Durham and Darlington Crisis Team following a restructure of its operational management and governance processes and arrangements in April 2022. This meant that whilst all the points had been actioned, some work was still being carried out at the time of the Pre-Inquest Review Hearings to continue to refine and improve the Crisis Team and ensure any changes were fully embedded. As heard at the inquest and set out in the statement of Thomas Hurst, all actions have been addressed, with a plan for outstanding training to be completed, however if you wish for further clarity on any particular action please let me know.”

Source location

Response from Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the fully transitioned PSIRF arrangements, including the implemented InPhase incident-reporting system and associated processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) will replace the current Serious Incident Framework 2015. This represents a significant shift in the way the NHS responds to patient safety incidents and is a major step towards establishing a safety management system across the NHS. This is a key part of the national NHS Patient Safety Strategy, which recognises that new ways of learning are required to drive change and improve standards.”

Source location

Response from Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue refining and embedding Durham and Darlington Crisis Team improvements through the overarching improvement plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As advised at the inquest, the action plan for the thematic review was reviewed and incorporated into a larger overarching improvement plan for the Durham and Darlington Crisis Team following a restructure of its operational management and governance processes and arrangements in April 2022. This meant that whilst all the points had been actioned, some work was still being carried out at the time of the Pre-Inquest Review Hearings to continue to refine and improve the Crisis Team and ensure any changes were fully embedded. As heard at the inquest and set out in the statement of Thomas Hurst, all actions have been addressed, with a plan for outstanding training to be completed, however if you wish for further clarity on any particular action please let me know.”

Source location

Response from Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The PFD appears to arise from unrelated advice about a future investigation, not outstanding concerns from evidence heard at this inquest.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It was therefore disappointing to receive a further PFD on this matter. I was further confused that the PFD in this case appears to have been issued in relation to you being advised on another unrelated matter that an SII would not be completed until January 2024, when the death occurred in October, and not due to any outstanding concerns in relation to the evidence heard at this inquest.”

Source location

Response from Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026