PFD report

Mary Margaret Horgan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Aug 2024•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of shared understanding and expectations between medical teams about how Patient Pass operates
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Finalise and circulate a communications guide clarifying Patient Pass purposes and referrer and receiver responsibilities across Greater Manchester hospitals.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 12 August 2024.
  2. Action

    Add a new-user Patient Pass screen explaining user responsibilities and requiring acceptance before system access.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 August 2024.
  3. Action

    Convene a cross-Trust working group, review the incident, and agree actions to improve understanding and operation of Patient Pass.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 August 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of shared understanding and expectations between medical teams about how Patient Pass operates

Wider context from the report

“Whist the inquest found, on the evidence, that the transfer of Mrs Horgan between hospitals without an Aspen collar and spinal precautions as advised did not significantly contribute to her death, the obvious disparity revealed by the evidence between the two medical teams of their respective understanding and expectations of the way in which Patient Pass operates serves to create uncertainty and confusion and could easily give rise to a situation where the lives of patients may be put at risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Finalise and circulate a communications guide clarifying Patient Pass purposes and referrer and receiver responsibilities across Greater Manchester hospitals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result, we have prepared a communications guide, which outlines the purpose of Patient Pass and clarifies the responsibilities of referrers and receivers. This document is due to be finalised shortly and will be circulated across Greater Manchester hospitals via their Medical Directors.”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance
Page 2 · response
Published 12 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add a new-user Patient Pass screen explaining user responsibilities and requiring acceptance before system access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to assist with improving the operation of Patient Pass, the Trust is collaborating with the Patient Pass developers to make changes to the system as follows:”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance
Page 2 · response
Published 12 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Convene a cross-Trust working group, review the incident, and agree actions to improve understanding and operation of Patient Pass.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has convened a working group, including ████████, Consultant Vascular Radiologist and lead for Quality and Patient Safety from MFT to discuss how we can improve and strengthen communication between the Trusts, and to gain input and perspective from MFT as an external referrer. This group has reviewed this incident, and agreed a number of actions to both improve understanding of the Patient Pass system and improve the system itself to reduce the likelihood of recurrence of such an incident.”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance
Page 2 · response
Published 12 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create, consult on, and circulate a seven-minute Greater Manchester briefing sharing learning on applying transfer policies and using Patient Pass.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In line with a request from the Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board, the Trusts are creating a seven-minute briefing document to share learning across Greater Manchester regarding the need to fully apply our transfer policies and to highlight the learning around the use of the Patient Pass system. We will consult with Dr Dare Seriki to prepare and circulate this in October 2024.”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance
Page 3 · response
Published 12 August 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Audit Patient Pass regularly against referral guidelines and issue feedback to referring Trusts when required.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 August 2024.
  2. 2

    Add a mandatory Patient Pass confirmation that a referrer discussed the case with a consultant before referral.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 August 2024.
  3. 3

    Update Patient Pass to require a continuously contactable telephone number for urgent referral information.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 August 2024.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Existing transfer policies were appropriate, consistent and current; the issue was failure to apply them fully, not a need to change the policies.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit Patient Pass regularly against referral guidelines and issue feedback to referring Trusts when required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The system will be audited regularly to ensure adherence to the referral guidelines, with feedback being issued to the referring Trust as required.”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance
Page 2 · response
Published 12 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add a mandatory Patient Pass confirmation that a referrer discussed the case with a consultant before referral.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to assist with improving the operation of Patient Pass, the Trust is collaborating with the Patient Pass developers to make changes to the system as follows:”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance
Page 2 · response
Published 12 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update Patient Pass to require a continuously contactable telephone number for urgent referral information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The guide informs the referrer that telephone contact details must be included at the time the referral is made, which will ensure that the specialist team can make timely contact by phone, if required, to provide time-critical advice. The Patient Pass system itself will also be updated to make the inclusion of a telephone number a mandatory field. Any non-urgent advice will continue to be provided via the Patient Pass system, so the guide also advises the referrer that Patient Pass should be accessed regularly for on-going communication with the tertiary service.”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance
Page 2 · response
Published 12 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing transfer policies were appropriate, consistent and current; the issue was failure to apply them fully, not a need to change the policies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Discussions have taken place with MFT colleagues and both Trust’s transfer policies have been reviewed and considered in light of Mrs Horgan’s case. Both policies were appropriate, consistent and in date at the time of the incident, however, regrettably the principles within them were not fully applied.”

Source location

Response from Northern Care Alliance
Page 3 · response
Published 12 August 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026