PFD report

Nesta Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Feb 2024•North West Wales

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to encourage junior doctors to challenge or discuss differing findings with consultant colleagues
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to enable professional challenge of clinical decisions
  2. Failure to undertake full investigations into patient deaths
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  3. Inadequate systems and processes for responding to urgent complaints and concerns
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to acknowledge and act on family and carer safety concerns in patient carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable handling of safety-related complaints
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Review incident and complaint processes and create an integrated framework covering incidents, complaints and mortality.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 March 2024.
  2. Action

    Engage the NHS Wales National Executive quality team to support improvement work on incident and complaint processes.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 March 2024.
  3. Action

    Issue and distribute a safety alert sharing learning and reinforcing listening to differing professional views, including junior clinicians’ concerns.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 March 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to encourage junior doctors to challenge or discuss differing findings with consultant colleagues

Wider context from the report

“a. Nesta Jones was seen by a number of orthopaedic doctors of varying grades including consultants. There was a concern during the evidence that junior doctors may not reach a different opinion to their consultant colleagues where the consultants have seen patients prior, and that this opinion is then followed through the patient’s journey. If junior doctors are not encouraged to challenge or discuss their findings (which may be different) to their consultant colleagues or have professional discussions, then there is a risk of missing diagnoses. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to enable professional challenge of clinical decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to undertake full investigations into patient deaths

Wider context from the report

“c. There was no full investigation undertaken by the Health Board into Nesta’s death other than a desktop report, the quality of which was questionable, as the Police were investigating. This means that there were no formal considerations as to immediate actions or learning required to reduce harm and the risk of death. In oral evidence I was informed that there is a new governance process being considered and likely to be in force by April 2024. I have made previous Reports on this precise point and yet the new and improved process is still not in place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate systems and processes for responding to urgent complaints and concerns

Wider context from the report

“b. The family wrote a detailed urgently marked letter to the Chief Executive on 3 May 2017 whilst Nesta was still in hospital. This requested consideration by him of her care as ‘a matter of life or death urgency’. There was no response. The Health Board did not have adequate and appropriate systems and processes for dealing with such complaints and concerns. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to acknowledge and act on family and carer safety concerns in patient care; Unreliable handling of safety-related complaints.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to formally consider immediate actions and learning to reduce harm and risk of death

Wider context from the report

“c. There was no full investigation undertaken by the Health Board into Nesta’s death other than a desktop report, the quality of which was questionable, as the Police were investigating. This means that there were no formal considerations as to immediate actions or learning required to reduce harm and the risk of death. In oral evidence I was informed that there is a new governance process being considered and likely to be in force by April 2024. I have made previous Reports on this precise point and yet the new and improved process is still not in place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review incident and complaint processes and create an integrated framework covering incidents, complaints and mortality.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to the complaint process, I can confirm that since Mrs Jones' death the process in the Complaints Team has now changed. A new Complaints Procedure was introduced in March 2022. This procedure includes an escalation process. However, I acknowledge that further improvement is still needed and we are currently undertaking a full review of the complaint process alongside the review of the incident process detailed below. We will create a new, integrated framework that covers incidents, complaints and mortality. This work is underway at present with a view to completion in the next two months.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 6 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage the NHS Wales National Executive quality team to support improvement work on incident and complaint processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Chief Executive is now personally driving this work which will include a new, integrated framework that covers incidents, complaints and mortality as I have detailed above. The Chief Executive is also personally overseeing performance in relation to overdue incidents and complaints with that area being escalated for close executive scrutiny. As a result, we expect to see significant improvement in the process, and the quality and timeliness of investigations, over the coming months as changes are implemented. We are also engaging the support of the NHS Wales National Executive quality team to support us in this improvement work.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 6 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue and distribute a safety alert sharing learning and reinforcing listening to differing professional views, including junior clinicians’ concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are issuing a Safety Alert to share the learning from this case and to highlight and support the improvement of listening to differing professional views and concerns including those from more junior clinicians. This will be shared across the organisation by the end of April 2024.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 6 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out the Call 4 Concern service to general hospital sites, providing patients and families access to urgent clinical support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, as mentioned at the inquest, the Health Board has also launched a new service to allow patients or relatives to escalate their clinical concerns, called Call 4 Concern. The Call 4 Concern Service was launched in Ysbyty Gwynedd during 2022 and following a pilot is now being rolled out at our other general hospital sites this year.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 6 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the revised Complaints Procedure, including an escalation process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to the complaint process, I can confirm that since Mrs Jones' death the process in the Complaints Team has now changed. A new Complaints Procedure was introduced in March 2022. This procedure includes an escalation process. However, I acknowledge that further improvement is still needed and we are currently undertaking a full review of the complaint process alongside the review of the incident process detailed below. We will create a new, integrated framework that covers incidents, complaints and mortality. This work is underway at present with a view to completion in the next two months.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 6 March 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Operate the Speak out Safely process, enabling staff to raise concerns outside their team through guardians or anonymous online messaging.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 March 2024.
  2. 2

    Oversee performance on overdue incidents and complaints through close executive scrutiny.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 March 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the Speak out Safely process, enabling staff to raise concerns outside their team through guardians or anonymous online messaging.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since Mrs Jones' death in 2017, we implemented a revised approach for staff to raise concerns outside of their team, if necessary. This new approach, called Speak out Safely, was launched in 2021 and allows any member of staff to raise concerns with a Speak out Safely Guardian or through an anonymous online messaging system where they can”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 6 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Oversee performance on overdue incidents and complaints through close executive scrutiny.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Chief Executive is now personally driving this work which will include a new, integrated framework that covers incidents, complaints and mortality as I have detailed above. The Chief Executive is also personally overseeing performance in relation to overdue incidents and complaints with that area being escalated for close executive scrutiny. As a result, we expect to see significant improvement in the process, and the quality and timeliness of investigations, over the coming months as changes are implemented. We are also engaging the support of the NHS Wales National Executive quality team to support us in this improvement work.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 6 March 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026