PFD report

Geoffrey Gordon Fuller · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Jun 2026•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to maintain emergency department capacity and timely patient flow
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain safe hospital patient flowPart of recurring concern: Insufficient emergency-department capacity for timely patient carePart of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency-department crowding leaving patients without appropriate clinical space
  2. Insufficient social care provision for onward discharge support
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely suitable onward care placements for patients ready for hospital dischargePart of recurring concern: Insufficient social and community care provision to meet care and discharge needs
  3. Failure to complete ambulance handovers within the 15-minute target
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Publish national clinical standards for emergency departments, acute pathways and discharge to improve flow and safer emergency care.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 September 2026.
  2. Action

    Invest over £450 million to expand urgent and emergency care capacity through the 2025/26 delivery plan.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 September 2026.
  3. Action

    Work with health and care partners to improve discharge arrangements, strengthen service integration and ensure safe, timely and appropriate care.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 September 2026.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain emergency department capacity and timely patient flow

Wider context from the report

“1. On the day of Mr Fuller’s ambulance delay, RCHT ED was accommodating 105 patients. ED has a capacity of 42 patients. ED accommodated the surplus patients on trolleys in corridors, seated within the waiting room or remaining inside ambulances in the parking area outside ED. 2. The situation had not improved as at the date of this Inquest. 3. EDs have a national target for 95% of patients to be admitted, transferred or discharged within 4 hours. It was noted that there is a recent major study which shows that the standardised mortality rate starts to rise from 5 hours after the patient’s time of arrival at the ED and they concluded that after 6–8 hours, there is one extra death for every 82 patients delayed. This increased mortality is partly attributed to the fact that patients in ED are not receiving the surgery or specialist care that is available on the wards. 4. Data indicates that RCHT have been failing to meet the 4-hour target for a significant number of patients. For the opening months of 2026 approximately 50% of patients have still been in ED after 4 hours. 5. RCHT witnesses reported that over the last few weeks the ED has been regularly required to accommodate over 100 patients (in a unit with a capacity for 42 patients). This has involved significant numbers of patients still in ED after 12 hours, some still in ED after 24 hours. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain safe hospital patient flow; Insufficient emergency-department capacity for timely patient care; Unsafe emergency-department crowding leaving patients without appropriate clinical space.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient social care provision for onward discharge support

Wider context from the report

“1. The court found there was insufficient bed availability on acute wards which was attributable to significant numbers of patients in hospital with no reason to reside (NCTR), these being patients who are medically optimised but cannot be discharged due to lack of onward care support. 2. On the day of the ambulance delay, 7 July 2025, almost 20% of patients in RCHT were recorded as NCTR. 3. The court noted the main cause for the numbers of NCTR patients was insufficient social care provision, whether commissioned by social services or NHS. 4. Investigations in 2022 and 2023 by SWAST and the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) found a direct link between ambulance delays and inadequate social care provision. The court noted the SWAST systems report which found… “…..there is a direct link between patients waiting in the hospital for discharge to social care and patients being cared for inside ambulances and Emergency Departments.” 5. This court has previously noted data indicating significant vacancies in social care posts in Cornwall are vacant reflecting the national picture of nationwide vacant direct social care posts. [see previous PFD reports on this subject] 6. The court noted that the NHS does not carry responsibility for the recruitment and retention of social care staff or any broad obligation to promote the social care market. 7. The HSSIB report referred to the fact that the organisations immediately required to deal with ambulance delays are ambulance trusts and acute hospitals, In Cornwall that is SWAST and RCHT. These organisations do not have control over the services primarily responsible for ambulance delays, namely social care provision and support. They are unable to influence the whole-system and therefore carry risks that they cannot wholly mitigate or manage. 8. The court noted the HSSIB report which states that delayed discharges (and consequent ambulance delays) are a national issue which is attributed to a whole system failure of health and social care. The court noted the HSSIB investigation’s first safety recommendation is an urgent ‘whole system’ response to reduce patient harm. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely suitable onward care placements for patients ready for hospital discharge; Insufficient social and community care provision to meet care and discharge needs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete ambulance handovers within the 15-minute target

Wider context from the report

“1. The court noted that the NHS national target is for ambulances to handover patients to hospital is within 15 minutes of arrival. 2. The total ambulance delay on 7 July 2025 for Mr Fuller was approximately 13 hours, involving delays in both response and handover. 3. The delay in ambulance response was 10 hours and 12 minutes, during which time Mr Fuller was in pain and unable to move due to a dislocated hip. 4. On arrival at Royal Cornwall Hospital (RCHT), Mr Fuller spent a further 2 hours and 52 minutes before being handed over to the emergency department. 5. On 7 July 2025, at RCHT, the average handover time was two hours, 24 minutes with over 211 hours of ambulance availability lost to these handover delays. This is the equivalent of approximately 19 double crewed ambulance (DCA) shifts lost to delays (based on a standard 11-hour shift). 6. Data for the two months before Mr Fuller’s death reveals average handover delays at RCHT of 1 hour and 26 minutes for May 2025, and 1 hour and 27 minutes for June 2025 (beyond the 15 minute target). 7. Recent data indicates the picture has not improved. Significant average handover delays at RCHT were recorded for every month of 2026 to date (beyond the target 15 minutes). The data for May 2026 indicates an average handover delay of 1 hour and 22 minutes beyond the 15-minute target. 8. The day before this Inquest, 7 June 2026, SWAST recorded average handover delays at RCHT of 1 hour and 10 minutes. 9. These handover delays lead to the unavailability of ambulances to respond to emergency calls. Furthermore, the average handover delays conceal spikes such as that which led to the long delay in this case. Such long delays increase the risk of mortality. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prevent emergency department crowding from patients left awaiting handover

Wider context from the report

“10. The court heard evidence of a new policy being implemented by SWAST to try and reduce ambulance resources being tied down in lengthy waits at hospital. After a 90-minute handover delay the ambulance paramedics will provide notice to ED that a patient is being left on a trolley in a corridor with fluids and medications if required so long as that patient is stable. This has led to significant crowding in RCHT emergency department (ED). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe emergency-department crowding leaving patients without appropriate clinical space.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish national clinical standards for emergency departments, acute pathways and discharge to improve flow and safer emergency care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This includes, through delivering the Urgent and Emergency Care Delivery Plan 2025/26, having invested over £450 million to expand urgent and emergency care capacity. We have also published national clinical standards through the Model Emergency Department, Model Acute Pathway and Model Discharge programmes, which are designed to improve flow through hospitals, reduce prolonged waits and support safer emergency care.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Invest over £450 million to expand urgent and emergency care capacity through the 2025/26 delivery plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This includes, through delivering the Urgent and Emergency Care Delivery Plan 2025/26, having invested over £450 million to expand urgent and emergency care capacity. We have also published national clinical standards through the Model Emergency Department, Model Acute Pathway and Model Discharge programmes, which are designed to improve flow through hospitals, reduce prolonged waits and support safer emergency care.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with health and care partners to improve discharge arrangements, strengthen service integration and ensure safe, timely and appropriate care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We note your findings regarding the whole-system nature of these issues and will carefully consider this report alongside wider evidence on discharge delays, patient flow and urgent and emergency care pressures. The Government remains committed to working with partners across the health and care system to improve discharge arrangements, strengthen integration between services and ensure patients receive safe, timely and appropriate care.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Drive progress on immediate adult social care reforms concerning dementia, motor neurone disease and adult safeguarding.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 September 2026.
  2. 2

    Bring forward the adult social care commission’s reporting date to summer 2027.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 September 2026.
  3. 3

    Carefully consider the report alongside wider evidence on discharge delays, patient flow and urgent and emergency care pressures.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 3 September 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Drive progress on immediate adult social care reforms concerning dementia, motor neurone disease and adult safeguarding.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Beyond these immediate measures, this Government’s vision for a National Care Service is about building a social care system that gives people greater choice, control, dignity and independence. The Prime Minister has made clear that he wants to see rapid progress on this, working in partnership with the adult social care sector. The Government is driving progress on the recommendations that Baroness Casey’s independent commission into adult social care made earlier this year for immediate action on dementia, motor neurone disease and adult safeguarding. The Government has also brought forward the date for Baroness Casey’s commission to make recommendations on the future of adult social care and how to deliver the National Care Service; the Commission will now report by summer 2027 rather than by 2028.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Bring forward the adult social care commission’s reporting date to summer 2027.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Beyond these immediate measures, this Government’s vision for a National Care Service is about building a social care system that gives people greater choice, control, dignity and independence. The Prime Minister has made clear that he wants to see rapid progress on this, working in partnership with the adult social care sector. The Government is driving progress on the recommendations that Baroness Casey’s independent commission into adult social care made earlier this year for immediate action on dementia, motor neurone disease and adult safeguarding. The Government has also brought forward the date for Baroness Casey’s commission to make recommendations on the future of adult social care and how to deliver the National Care Service; the Commission will now report by summer 2027 rather than by 2028.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Carefully consider the report alongside wider evidence on discharge delays, patient flow and urgent and emergency care pressures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We note your findings regarding the whole-system nature of these issues and will carefully consider this report alongside wider evidence on discharge delays, patient flow and urgent and emergency care pressures. The Government remains committed to working with partners across the health and care system to improve discharge arrangements, strengthen integration between services and ensure patients receive safe, timely and appropriate care.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026