PFD report

Nuala Seddon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Feb 2017•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of appropriate monitoring for patients discharged from ITU
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge
  2. Failure to ensure clinical staff make discharge decisions
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical review and authorisation of discharge decisionsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processesPart of recurring concern: Unsafe clinical decisions by non-medically qualified personnel
  3. Failure to investigate patient safety events appropriately
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of appropriate monitoring for patients discharged from ITU

Wider context from the report

“(2) The lack of both telemetry and direct nursing visualisation raises a concern that patients who are discharged from the highest level of clinical care on ITU are then exposed to significant risk of unrecognised deterioration, owing to a lack of appropriate monitoring. This potentially remains the case even though the Heart Hospital has now transferred to be part of Barts NHS Trust, as the hospital at Westmoreland Street still operates as part of UCLH. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure clinical staff make discharge decisions

Wider context from the report

“(1) It seems clear that a decision was made to transfer Mrs Seddon from ITU on 27 November 2014. There remains the potential that this decision was made by non-clinical staff. The lack of documentation regarding this significant decision is concerning and leaves open the possibility that future discharges could be based on non-clinical need or inappropriate decision-making which is not subsequently able to be scrutinised because of a lack of documentation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical review and authorisation of discharge decisions; Unreliable hospital discharge processes; Unsafe clinical decisions by non-medically qualified personnel.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to investigate patient safety events appropriately

Wider context from the report

“(3) The ward nurse who was caring for Mrs Seddon at the point of her arrest was not involved in any debrief or significant event investigation. This raises a concern that there was a lack of appropriate investigation into Mrs Seddon’s arrest. Future deaths could occur if the hospital Trust is not able to identify and address patient safety issues because of this failure to investigate appropriately. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of available telemetry monitoring for patients discharged from ITU

Wider context from the report

“(1) I heard evidence from the ward nurse that concerns regarding lack of available telemetry remain a current issue at the Heart Hospital (which is now part of Barts NHS Trust). This raises a concern that patients who are discharged from the highest level of clinical care on ITU are then exposed to significant risk of unrecognised deterioration, owing to a lack of appropriate monitoring. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of documentation of significant discharge decisions

Wider context from the report

“(1) It seems clear that a decision was made to transfer Mrs Seddon from ITU on 27 November 2014. There remains the potential that this decision was made by non-clinical staff. The lack of documentation regarding this significant decision is concerning and leaves open the possibility that future discharges could be based on non-clinical need or inappropriate decision-making which is not subsequently able to be scrutinised because of a lack of documentation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge documentation.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.