PFD report

Sheldon Lawrence Jeans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Jul 2025•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
5

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 5 recipients

Stated actions
19

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of policy and guidance informing prison staff of the dangers of illicitly brewed alcohol
  2. Failure to secure in-possession medication against access by other prisoners
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to secure and control medication
  3. Lack of policy and guidance governing access to and use of illicitly brewed alcohol in prisons
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.13

  1. Action

    Share targeted illicitly brewed alcohol briefing materials with the local Drug Strategy Lead to support awareness, harm reduction and operational decision-making.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 July 2025.
  2. Action

    Conduct focused searches to identify and safely remove illicitly brewed alcohol, then report and destroy items discovered.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 July 2025.
  3. Action

    Introduce a Local Operating Procedure for managing incidents involving prisoners found under the influence, including illicitly brewed alcohol.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 July 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    NHS England and Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust are responsible for prisoners’ medication management, prescribing and decisions about medication held in possession.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of policy and guidance informing prison staff of the dangers of illicitly brewed alcohol

Wider context from the report

“(1) There is a lack of national policy, and local guidance at HMP Guys Marsh, to inform staff working in prisons of the dangers of illicitly brewed alcohol, also known as hooch. There is also a lack of policy and guidance to assist those working within the prisoner estate with the management and governance of the access to, and use of, illicitly brewed alcohol. Illicitly brewed alcohol is a common substance across the prisoner estate. Evidence was given at the Inquest that in the month of September 2022, 215.5 litres of illicitly brewed alcohol were seized at HMP Guys Marsh. Evidence was given that Hooch continues to be a common problem in prisons. Illicitly brewed alcohol in prison is a substance made from items which are readily and legitimately available to prisoners. Hooch was described as a very, very dangerous substance during the course of the evidence and as is clear from the cause of his death, was central to the death of Sheldon. Evidence was given that it has sedative effects which if taken with certain medications can increase the sedative effects. Evidence was given that the policies in place concerning the possession and use of illicit substances within the prisoner estate at the time of Sheldon’s death, and those in place now, focus on drugs or medication, but are silent in relation to alcohol. I am concerned that this lack of guidance could lead to a future death in prison custody ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to secure in-possession medication against access by other prisoners

Wider context from the report

“(2) Prisoners can have access to certain medication to hold in their possession which could be accessed by other prisoners and there is a lack of national policy, and local policy at HMP Guys Marsh, from a healthcare and prison perspective, around the governance of medication held in possession in the prisoner estate. Evidence was heard that when a person is prescribed medication in prison, it can either be taken under supervision, or a prisoner can be provided with the medication to hold in their possession, in their cell. In these cases, the prisoner is responsible for the safety of that medication. Prior to being provided with medication in their possession a risk assessment is undertaken upon the prisoner to assess the risks associated with the drug and also the risks associated with prisoner. Whilst medications defined as controlled drugs would not be given in possession, it is possible to have medication that could cause death in possession. Although Sheldon was not prescribed the medications that caused his death, evidence was given some of those medications are suitable to be prescribed to a prisoner in possession. It is not know how Sheldon accessed the medication found in his system at the time of his death, other than to say he obtained it at HMP Guys Marsh. At HMP Guys Marsh, which may not be the case across the prisoner estate, a lockable cupboard is provided in cells for the storage of medication. Evidence was given that at times cells will be left insecure at HMP Guys Marsh when the prison is in a state of unlock, such as when prisoners collect meals or for example when they go for showers or are out of the cells on association. Evidence was given that prisoners go into each other's cells when they are in a state of unlock. Prisoners could therefore enter another prisoner's cell. If medication is not held securely in a lockable cupboard there is a risk that prisoners who are not prescribed medication, could access medication. Evidence was given at the Inquest that due to the chaotic life some prisoners lead, even when provided with lockable cupboards, cells at HMP Guys Marsh have been seen to contain medication that is not secure and is strewn all over the cell. The medication in Sheldon’s cell at the time of his death was found insecure in a Tupperware container. Further, if a medication prescribed to a prisoner is discontinued, evidence was heard that the onus is upon the prisoner returning any excess medication to the healthcare department at HMP Guys Marsh which may be the position in other prisons. The issues around securing of medication held in possession in a cell and the onus being upon prisoners to return unused medication, carries a risk of prisoners accessing unprescribed medication. At the time of Sheldon’s death he was not prescribed the medications found in his system and he had in his cell excessive amounts of medication he was prescribed and had previously been prescribed and discontinued. I am therefore concerned the lack of guidance and policy nationally, and locally at HMP Guys Marsh, on storage of in possession medication and what to do when a medication is discontinued to ensure prisoners do not continue to possess left over medication, could lead to future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to secure and control medication.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of policy and guidance governing access to and use of illicitly brewed alcohol in prisons

Wider context from the report

“(1) There is a lack of national policy, and local guidance at HMP Guys Marsh, to inform staff working in prisons of the dangers of illicitly brewed alcohol, also known as hooch. There is also a lack of policy and guidance to assist those working within the prisoner estate with the management and governance of the access to, and use of, illicitly brewed alcohol. Illicitly brewed alcohol is a common substance across the prisoner estate. Evidence was given at the Inquest that in the month of September 2022, 215.5 litres of illicitly brewed alcohol were seized at HMP Guys Marsh. Evidence was given that Hooch continues to be a common problem in prisons. Illicitly brewed alcohol in prison is a substance made from items which are readily and legitimately available to prisoners. Hooch was described as a very, very dangerous substance during the course of the evidence and as is clear from the cause of his death, was central to the death of Sheldon. Evidence was given that it has sedative effects which if taken with certain medications can increase the sedative effects. Evidence was given that the policies in place concerning the possession and use of illicit substances within the prisoner estate at the time of Sheldon’s death, and those in place now, focus on drugs or medication, but are silent in relation to alcohol. I am concerned that this lack of guidance could lead to a future death in prison custody ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure return of excess medication after prescription discontinuation

Wider context from the report

“(2) Prisoners can have access to certain medication to hold in their possession which could be accessed by other prisoners and there is a lack of national policy, and local policy at HMP Guys Marsh, from a healthcare and prison perspective, around the governance of medication held in possession in the prisoner estate. Evidence was heard that when a person is prescribed medication in prison, it can either be taken under supervision, or a prisoner can be provided with the medication to hold in their possession, in their cell. In these cases, the prisoner is responsible for the safety of that medication. Prior to being provided with medication in their possession a risk assessment is undertaken upon the prisoner to assess the risks associated with the drug and also the risks associated with prisoner. Whilst medications defined as controlled drugs would not be given in possession, it is possible to have medication that could cause death in possession. Although Sheldon was not prescribed the medications that caused his death, evidence was given some of those medications are suitable to be prescribed to a prisoner in possession. It is not know how Sheldon accessed the medication found in his system at the time of his death, other than to say he obtained it at HMP Guys Marsh. At HMP Guys Marsh, which may not be the case across the prisoner estate, a lockable cupboard is provided in cells for the storage of medication. Evidence was given that at times cells will be left insecure at HMP Guys Marsh when the prison is in a state of unlock, such as when prisoners collect meals or for example when they go for showers or are out of the cells on association. Evidence was given that prisoners go into each other's cells when they are in a state of unlock. Prisoners could therefore enter another prisoner's cell. If medication is not held securely in a lockable cupboard there is a risk that prisoners who are not prescribed medication, could access medication. Evidence was given at the Inquest that due to the chaotic life some prisoners lead, even when provided with lockable cupboards, cells at HMP Guys Marsh have been seen to contain medication that is not secure and is strewn all over the cell. The medication in Sheldon’s cell at the time of his death was found insecure in a Tupperware container. Further, if a medication prescribed to a prisoner is discontinued, evidence was heard that the onus is upon the prisoner returning any excess medication to the healthcare department at HMP Guys Marsh which may be the position in other prisons. The issues around securing of medication held in possession in a cell and the onus being upon prisoners to return unused medication, carries a risk of prisoners accessing unprescribed medication. At the time of Sheldon’s death he was not prescribed the medications found in his system and he had in his cell excessive amounts of medication he was prescribed and had previously been prescribed and discontinued. I am therefore concerned the lack of guidance and policy nationally, and locally at HMP Guys Marsh, on storage of in possession medication and what to do when a medication is discontinued to ensure prisoners do not continue to possess left over medication, could lead to future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to secure and control medication; Unsafe disposal of medication.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share targeted illicitly brewed alcohol briefing materials with the local Drug Strategy Lead to support awareness, harm reduction and operational decision-making.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to seasonal increases in IBA reported usage, the DAG issued a targeted briefing note outlining specific risks, indicators of IBA production, and guidance on effective operational responses. These materials have been shared with the Drug Strategy Lead here at HMP Guys Marsh to support local awareness-raising, harm reduction initiatives, and inform our decision-making.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct focused searches to identify and safely remove illicitly brewed alcohol, then report and destroy items discovered.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Searching operations continue with a specific focus on identifying and safely removing IBA, which is subsequently reported and destroyed by the Security Department when discovered.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a Local Operating Procedure for managing incidents involving prisoners found under the influence, including illicitly brewed alcohol.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A comprehensive Local Operating Procedure (LOP) has been introduced, to guide staff in managing incidents involving prisoners found under the influence, including those affected by IBA.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Restrict access to commonly used brewing ingredients by removing waste-based items from the canteen list and limiting fruit and natural sugar-based products.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, preventative steps have been taken to limit the availability of ingredients commonly used in brewing IBA. Waste-based items have been removed from the canteen list, and fruit and natural sugar-based products have been restricted. These measures aim to reduce the opportunity for prisoners to produce IBA.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure in-cell medication safes are available and fit for purpose where used.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, in cell medication safes are available and we have renewed our focus on ensuring these are available and fit-for-purpose where utilised.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a local operating procedure at HMP Guys Marsh for managing prisoners found under the influence, including those affected by illicitly brewed alcohol.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Locally, HMP Guys Marsh has implemented a series of targeted local measures to mitigate the risks of IBA. A comprehensive Local Operating Procedure (LOP) has been introduced to guide staff in managing incidents involving prisoners found under the influence, including those affected by IBA. Searching operations continue with a specific focus on identifying and safely removing IBA, which must be reported and destroyed by the Security Department. To strengthen these efforts, the Dedicated Searching Team is deployed to support intelligence-led searches where IBA is a priority concern.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Services
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and disseminate staff guidance and awareness materials on illicitly brewed alcohol, including the Drugs in Prison and Probation guide.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regarding the management of illicitly brewed alcohol, the Drug and Alcohol Group (DAG) in HMPPS has developed and disseminated a range of materials specifically focused on illicitly brewed alcohol (IBA). Notably, the Drugs in Prison and Probation (DiPP) guide provides comprehensive information for staff at all levels—from frontline officers to heads of function. It is designed to enhance understanding of substances, support structured discussions, raise awareness, and assist with induction processes for new staff. Harm reduction support for alcohol use is growing across the prison estate, with mutual aid groups like Alcoholics Anonymous playing a key role. In addition, Incentivised Substance Free Living (ISFL) units are now available in 85 prisons, including at HMP Guys Marsh,”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Services
Page 1 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide targeted seasonal briefing materials on illicitly brewed alcohol risks, production indicators and operational responses to prison Drug Strategy Leads.

Verbatim wording from the response

“offering a supportive environment for individuals to address both alcohol and drug-related issues. As part of wider awareness efforts, Prison Radio is being recommissioned to feature speakers with lived experience of alcohol-related harm, helping to highlight the impact of substance use and promote the support available.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Services
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and distribute prison health-promotion materials on safe medication storage and disposal of unused or discontinued medication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To further support safe medication practices, we will be developing and distributing new health promotion materials to the prison population at HMP Guys Marsh, but also within the wider Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust prison portfolio. These materials will focus on:”

Source location

Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remove medications that could assist illicit alcohol production from the formulary or provide them only under supervised, not-in-possession arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are many ways in which alcohol can be illicitly brewed in the prison setting. It is known that certain prescribed medications could be used to assist in the fermenting process and, where possible, we have already removed these from the prescribing formulary or”

Source location

Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a published in-possession medication compliance procedure with bi-monthly in-cell checks, discrepancy escalation and documented oversight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is no national policy around the governance of medication held in possession in the prison estate. Attached is our recently published local In-possession Medication Compliance procedure which outlines bi-monthly in-cell compliance checks for patients on in-possession medication. This process, which is led by pharmacy staff with HMPPS support, checks to ensure medication adherence, prevent diversion, and upholds the safety of medication. Any discrepancies would trigger a review, disciplinary action, or changes to in-possession status. Documentation is maintained via SystmOne. If required, formal notification letters are sent to the patients. The procedure aligns with NICE and Royal Pharmaceutical Society guidelines. Oversight is shared between pharmacy, wider healthcare and HMPPS teams and ensures that there are robust assurance mechanisms in place.”

Source location

Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess medication and individual suitability before issuing in-possession medication, with reassessment when circumstances change.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Before any medication is issued in-possession, a comprehensive risk assessment is undertaken to evaluate both the medication(s) and the individual’s suitability. This risk assessment can be updated / changed at any time but particularly in the event of a change of an individual’s circumstances.”

Source location

Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct intelligence-led and random checks of in-possession medication to monitor compliance and safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Healthcare teams conduct intelligence-led and random in-possession checks to monitor compliance and safety. Nonetheless, the overall security of the prison environment,”

Source location

Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England and Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust are responsible for prisoners’ medication management, prescribing and decisions about medication held in possession.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The handling of medication held in possession (IP) by prisoners and prescribing practices in prisons are the responsibility of NHS England. Here at HMP Guys Marsh, our commissioned partner is Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for prisoners’ in-possession medication and prescribing lies with NHS England under clinical assurance and national service specifications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The handling of medication held in possession (IP) by prisoners and prescribing practices in prisons are the responsibility of NHS England. The safe management of medication is governed by clinical assurance and national service specifications, which set out standards for prescribing, dispensing, and monitoring medication.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Services
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing risk assessments, compliance checks and medication procedures provide robust safeguards for in-possession medication governance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The practice of allowing prisoners to hold certain medications in-possession is designed to promote personal responsibility and mirror community standards. This approach supports individuals in preparing for release and reintegration with the community and aligns with the principle of equivalence of care. It is also in line with a variety of nationally applicable guidance. https://www.rpharms.com/recognition/setting-professional-standards/optimising-medicines-in-secure-environments.”

Source location

Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

HMPPS is responsible for prison security and safeguarding medication, including personal lockable safes for storage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“including the safeguarding of medication, is the responsibility of His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS). We work closely with HMPPS to ensure that security protocols are upheld and adapted as needed. This also includes the supervision of not-in-possession medication provided by Prison staff at the medication hatches.”

Source location

Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing local procedures, national standards, contractual monitoring, inspections and regional governance provide sufficient assurance for medicines safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Procedures and governance around the management of prescription medicines will vary between different prison categories and local risks and incidents. Various processes are used to inform medicines use and safety in each prison including security and clinical incident management and review; in-cell searches and clinical therapeutic or substance misuse testing. National guidance could further complicate what is already a complex issue for both prisoners and prison staff.”

Source location

Response from Department for Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Develop the Incentivised Substance Free Living unit to support prisoners addressing alcohol- and drug-related issues.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 July 2025.
  2. 2

    Restrict access to ingredients used to brew illicit alcohol by removing yeast-based items and limiting fruit and natural sugar-based products from the canteen.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 July 2025.
  3. 3

    Make Incentivised Substance Free Living units available across the prison estate, including HMP Guys Marsh.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 July 2025.
  4. 4

    Recommission Prison Radio programming featuring lived-experience speakers to raise awareness of alcohol-related harm and available support.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 July 2025.
  5. 5

    Monitor in-cell locker condition through daily Accommodation Fabric Checks and replace damaged lockers.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 July 2025.
  6. 6

    Continue intelligence-led searching focused on identifying and safely removing illicitly brewed alcohol, supported by the Dedicated Searching Team.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 July 2025.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Illicitly brewed alcohol availability is a matter for ministerial colleagues at the Ministry of Justice.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop the Incentivised Substance Free Living unit to support prisoners addressing alcohol- and drug-related issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, we have further developed our Incentivised Substance Free Living (ISFL) unit here at HMP Guys Marsh. This specialised unit offers a supportive environment for individuals to address both alcohol and drug-related issues.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 1 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Restrict access to ingredients used to brew illicit alcohol by removing yeast-based items and limiting fruit and natural sugar-based products from the canteen.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, preventative steps have been taken to limit the availability of ingredients commonly used in brewing IBA. Yeast-based items have been removed from the canteen list, and fruit and natural sugar-based products have been restricted. These measures aim to reduce the opportunity for prisoners to produce IBA.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Services
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make Incentivised Substance Free Living units available across the prison estate, including HMP Guys Marsh.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Regarding the management of illicitly brewed alcohol, the Drug and Alcohol Group (DAG) in HMPPS has developed and disseminated a range of materials specifically focused on illicitly brewed alcohol (IBA). Notably, the Drugs in Prison and Probation (DiPP) guide provides comprehensive information for staff at all levels—from frontline officers to heads of function. It is designed to enhance understanding of substances, support structured discussions, raise awareness, and assist with induction processes for new staff. Harm reduction support for alcohol use is growing across the prison estate, with mutual aid groups like Alcoholics Anonymous playing a key role. In addition, Incentivised Substance Free Living (ISFL) units are now available in 85 prisons, including at HMP Guys Marsh,”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Services
Page 1 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recommission Prison Radio programming featuring lived-experience speakers to raise awareness of alcohol-related harm and available support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“offering a supportive environment for individuals to address both alcohol and drug-related issues. As part of wider awareness efforts, Prison Radio is being recommissioned to feature speakers with lived experience of alcohol-related harm, helping to highlight the impact of substance use and promote the support available.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Services
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor in-cell locker condition through daily Accommodation Fabric Checks and replace damaged lockers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, in-cell lockers will be replaced if damaged and their condition will be monitored through daily Accommodation Fabric Checks across all residential units.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Services
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue intelligence-led searching focused on identifying and safely removing illicitly brewed alcohol, supported by the Dedicated Searching Team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Locally, HMP Guys Marsh has implemented a series of targeted local measures to mitigate the risks of IBA. A comprehensive Local Operating Procedure (LOP) has been introduced to guide staff in managing incidents involving prisoners found under the influence, including those affected by IBA. Searching operations continue with a specific focus on identifying and safely removing IBA, which must be reported and destroyed by the Security Department. To strengthen these efforts, the Dedicated Searching Team is deployed to support intelligence-led searches where IBA is a priority concern.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Services
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Illicitly brewed alcohol availability is a matter for ministerial colleagues at the Ministry of Justice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your report raises concerns over the availability illicitly brewed alcohol and a lack of national and local policy at HMP Guys Marsh, around the governance of medication held in prisoners’ possession. The first of these is a matter for my Ministerial colleagues at the Ministry of Justice.”

Source location

Response from Department for Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 28 July 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/5

Data last updated 7 September 2026