PFD report

Andrew David Kitson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Mar 2022•West Yorkshire Eastern

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Insufficiently refined parameters and guidance for spontaneous police pursuits in residential areas
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable police pursuit management and authorisationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable safety governance of spontaneous police pursuits
  2. Lack of statistical evidence and analytical feedback for evaluating the risks and effectiveness of spontaneous police pursuits
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable safety governance of spontaneous police pursuits
  3. Unreliable availability of complete real-time information to pursuit managers
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of police operational communications to reliably share safety-critical information
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Liaise with national pursuit and driving standards leads to assess compliance with national standards.

    Stated by West Yorkshire PoliceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 March 2022.
  2. Action

    Assess trends in pursuit outcomes and their links to driver training and national standards.

    Stated by West Yorkshire PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 March 2022.
  3. Action

    Collaborate with the National Pursuit Group on routine pursuit debriefing and adapt local practice accordingly.

    Stated by West Yorkshire PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 March 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Redefining pursuit parameters using statistical data requires national-level discussion to ensure consistency across police forces.

    Stated by West Yorkshire PoliceRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficiently refined parameters and guidance for spontaneous police pursuits in residential areas

Wider context from the report

“(2) The rules governing spontaneous police pursuits in residential areas place an onerous burden upon police standards review continuously the safety of proceeding whilst at the same time driving at high speed. The pursuit manager who authorises the continuance of a pursuit is dependant upon fragments of verbal messages relayed over the radio, due to the perceived need to leave airtime for other TPAC units to input information. The Inquest heard evidence to the effect that real time camera pictures from the police vehicle are not always available due to IT issues. This means the pursuit manager must largely trust the judgement of the police driver. In order to lessen the burden upon the police driver in having to weigh numerous factors in a continuing, complex judgement, consideration should be given to a refinement of the parameters in which pursuits in residential areas are permitted. Such guidance to pursuit managers (informed by data regarding the effectiveness and risks arising in previous pursuits) would help to promote consistency and lessen the dependence upon a case-by-case judgement made in a pressured timescale. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable police pursuit management and authorisation; Unreliable safety governance of spontaneous police pursuits.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of statistical evidence and analytical feedback for evaluating the risks and effectiveness of spontaneous police pursuits

Wider context from the report

“(1) The evidence taken at the inquest revealed insufficient statistical evidence was available to guide an evaluation of the proportion of spontaneous police pursuits which (a) involve driving at high speeds through residential areas; (b) result in the apprehension of an offender; (c) result in personal injury to other road users or property damage; (d) are aborted without the alleged offender being caught; without such analytical feedback (ideally prepared on a national basis) the risks inherent in such pursuits, balanced against their effectiveness, cannot adequately be reviewed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safety governance of spontaneous police pursuits.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unreliable availability of complete real-time information to pursuit managers

Wider context from the report

“(2) The rules governing spontaneous police pursuits in residential areas place an onerous burden upon police standards review continuously the safety of proceeding whilst at the same time driving at high speed. The pursuit manager who authorises the continuance of a pursuit is dependant upon fragments of verbal messages relayed over the radio, due to the perceived need to leave airtime for other TPAC units to input information. The Inquest heard evidence to the effect that real time camera pictures from the police vehicle are not always available due to IT issues. This means the pursuit manager must largely trust the judgement of the police driver. In order to lessen the burden upon the police driver in having to weigh numerous factors in a continuing, complex judgement, consideration should be given to a refinement of the parameters in which pursuits in residential areas are permitted. Such guidance to pursuit managers (informed by data regarding the effectiveness and risks arising in previous pursuits) would help to promote consistency and lessen the dependence upon a case-by-case judgement made in a pressured timescale. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of police operational communications to reliably share safety-critical information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Liaise with national pursuit and driving standards leads to assess compliance with national standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following receipt of the Regulation 28 report, we undertook to re-evaluate our local arrangements at West Yorkshire Police and also to liaise with the NPCC National leads for Pursuit and Driving Standards to assess our compliance with National Standards.”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 1 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess trends in pursuit outcomes and their links to driver training and national standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The ongoing assessment of trends in pursuit outcomes and the link to driver training (national standards) has been raised with ████████ (national lead for Pursuit).”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 3 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Collaborate with the National Pursuit Group on routine pursuit debriefing and adapt local practice accordingly.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Collaboration with the National Pursuit Group regarding whether all Forces routinely debrief pursuit activity (incorporating airmax/ watchguard) and to adapt as local practice is ongoing.”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 3 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss reconfiguring Chronicle to record whether pursuits result in arrests.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is currently no system-retrievable data which directly correlates whether a suspect is detained as a result of a pursuit. Additional de-briefing reports (the command and control system incident log, supervisor shift reports) do routinely explain pursuit activity and arrests made. Chronicle can only be configured on a national level to include whether an arrest(s) is made or not. Discussions are to be undertaken with the National Pursuit Group to explore the re-configuration of Chronicle to include specific arrest information.”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 2 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Record all pursuits in Chronicle and provide the data quarterly to the National Pursuits Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“West Yorkshire Police has recorded data relating to pursuits since 2017. From April 2019, the mechanisms for recording data changed and as such for the period between April 2019 and July 2020, the data remains available but only manually retrievable from RT18 forms. This particular format is not easily useable or searchable. However, since July 2020 all pursuits are recorded on a Force system called Chronicle (an electronic database) and this data is passed through to the National Pursuits Group (NPROII) on a quarterly basis. The data includes whether the pursuit was spontaneous, the reason for the pursuit, time/date, whether the pursuit was discontinued, the reason for discontinuance and the location.”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 2 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Re-evaluate local pursuit arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following receipt of the Regulation 28 report, we undertook to re-evaluate our local arrangements at West Yorkshire Police and also to liaise with the NPCC National leads for Pursuit and Driving Standards to assess our compliance with National Standards.”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 1 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Redefining pursuit parameters using statistical data requires national-level discussion to ensure consistency across police forces.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to lessen the burden upon the police driver in having to weigh numerous factors in continuing, complex judgement, consideration should be given to a refinement of the parameters in which pursuits in residential areas are permitted. Such guidance to pursuit managers (informed by data regarding the effectiveness and risks arising in previous disputes) would help to promote consistency and lessen dependence upon a case-by-case judgement made in a pressured timescale”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 3 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing dynamic risk assessment, trained decision-makers and ground commander primacy are retained rather than imposing more limited pursuit parameters.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is an operational reality that every pursuit has different and distinct dynamics which relate to: environmental factors; suspect identity, capability and intent; suspect vehicle capability; police officer capability; police vehicle capability; offence severity; and the ongoing risk assessment. Taking these into account, and in order to provide the best possible decision-making capability, West Yorkshire Police’s Driver Training utilises Authorised Professional (National) Practice, in conjunction with robust training around the use of the National Decision Model, which outlines the relevant roles and responsibilities as below.”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 3 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operational policing, including spontaneous pursuits, is assigned to the Chief Constable, while the Mayor’s role is limited to accountability without fettering operational independence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The use of spontaneous police pursuits is a matter of operational policing concerning the deployment of police officers which falls under the direction and control of the Chief Constable. As the Mayor of West Yorkshire with Police and Crime Commissioner responsibilities, my statutory role is to hold the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire to account for the performance of his functions without compromising or fettering his operational independence (s.1 Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 and Policing Protocol Order 2011).”

Source location

Response from Mayor of West Yorkshire
Page 2 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Train pursuit officers in driving, risk management and the National Decision Model, with periodic refresher training.

    Stated by West Yorkshire PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 March 2022.
  2. 2

    Refer pursuits involving death or serious injury to the IOPC and initiate accredited post-incident procedures.

    Stated by West Yorkshire PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 March 2022.
  3. 3

    Provide assigned pursuit resources, including air and dog units, and enable supervisory discontinuation based on risk assessment.

    Stated by West Yorkshire PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 March 2022.
  4. 4

    Feed local and national pursuit data into driver training on risk assessment and suspect apprehension.

    Stated by West Yorkshire PoliceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 March 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train pursuit officers in driving, risk management and the National Decision Model, with periodic refresher training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is an operational reality that every pursuit has different and distinct dynamics which relate to: environmental factors; suspect identity, capability and intent; suspect vehicle capability; police officer capability; police vehicle capability; offence severity; and the ongoing risk assessment. Taking these into account, and in order to provide the best possible decision-making capability, West Yorkshire Police’s Driver Training utilises Authorised Professional (National) Practice, in conjunction with robust training around the use of the National Decision Model, which outlines the relevant roles and responsibilities as below.”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 3 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refer pursuits involving death or serious injury to the IOPC and initiate accredited post-incident procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Should any pursuit result in death or serious injury, referrals are made to the IOPC via our Professional Standards Department and a Post-incident Procedure instigated with trained and accredited Post-incident Managers. This procedure is also a nationally standardised and accredited one which seeks to determine causation, any degree of blameworthiness and/ or learning & improvement activity for individuals and/ or the force involved.”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 5 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide assigned pursuit resources, including air and dog units, and enable supervisory discontinuation based on risk assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• providing other assigned resources such as NPAS (air assets, helicopter and fixed wing aircraft) and Dog Units;”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 5 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Feed local and national pursuit data into driver training on risk assessment and suspect apprehension.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The local data (via Chronicle) will be fed into training to inform of considerations around risk and the duty to apprehend suspects. Similarly, the national data reporting will be consistently fed into driver training.”

Source location

Response from West Yorkshire Police
Page 2 · response
Published 8 March 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026