Frances Margaret Ann Bell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Jun 2014•Essex

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Delays between readmission and arrival in theatre
  2. Lack of input from senior clinical staff at patient presentation
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care
  3. Failure to conduct root cause analysis and develop lessons learned and an action plan
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable root cause analysis processes
No response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is included in the published responses for this report.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays between readmission and arrival in theatre

Wider context from the report

“(3) There was an unacceptable delay between Mrs Bell’s readmission on the 31 March and her arrival in theatre on 1 April ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of input from senior clinical staff at patient presentation

Wider context from the report

“(2) There was no input from senior clinical staff at the time of Mrs Bell’s presentation on 30 March ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct root cause analysis and develop lessons learned and an action plan

Wider context from the report

“(1) There was no Root Causes Analysis Investigation carried out which would have identified lessons learned and an action plan ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable root cause analysis processes.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.