PFD report

Glyn Ackerley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Nov 2023•Cheshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to risk-stratify high-risk overdoses for immediate clinical response
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Re-share the overdose and suicidal-ideation initial assessment principles document with the ambulance service concerned.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 December 2023.
  2. Action

    Publish a national operational procedure requiring further overdose-call clinical intervention within 30 minutes and escalation to Category 2 if it does not occur within 40 minutes.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 December 2023.
  3. Action

    Complete a national review of the overdose and suicidal-ideation call procedure to ensure it remains fit for purpose.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 December 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Changes to overdose ambulance categorisation are determined by the Clinical Coding Review Group and Emergency Call Prioritisation Advisory Group.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to risk-stratify high-risk overdoses for immediate clinical response

Wider context from the report

“The current NHS Pathways process does not differentiate between a high risk and low risk overdose, categorising all such calls without additional symptoms as category 3. Evidence was heard during the inquest that time is of the essence when dealing with an opiate overdose, and giving reversal medication prior to any respiratory depression or cardiac arrest will likely have a better outcome. In light of the concerns raised by this case, NWAS have reviewed their process and added in additional questions for call handlers to identify high risk medications involved in an overdose, which they then automatically categorise as a category 2 and send for a call back from a clinician immediately. NWAS gave evidence in writing that they had raised the concern and their suggested management with the National NHS Pathways team on 6 April 2023, with the result that the national team would continue to review the process but with clinical review in 15 minutes and high risk medications being upgraded to category 2. It is unclear from the evidence whether this is a proposed change to the process in place in September 2022 which would mean Mr Ackerley would have had a category 2 response at 21.48, or whether the system remains the same. If the system is not for a category 2 response for high risk medication, it is my concern that this will not allow for prompt treatment of those who have taken a potentially fatal overdose. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ambulance call triage and re-triage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Re-share the overdose and suicidal-ideation initial assessment principles document with the ambulance service concerned.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The specific details of this case were not shared with NHS Pathways. However, the NHS Pathways team has discussed this case with North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) in response to their concerns regarding overdoses and suicidal ideation cases.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 1 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish a national operational procedure requiring further overdose-call clinical intervention within 30 minutes and escalation to Category 2 if it does not occur within 40 minutes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In April 2021, NHS England and Improvement, in collaboration with the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) published a new operational procedure¹ for all ambulance services in England which sets out that, where an overdose is declared, a further clinical intervention should take place within 30 minutes, and/or the case will be automatically upgraded to a Category 2 ambulance response if this does not occur within 40 minutes. If, on review the clinical view is that, given the individual factors of the case this should be upgraded to a Category 1 or 2 emergency ambulance response this is done without delay.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 1 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a national review of the overdose and suicidal-ideation call procedure to ensure it remains fit for purpose.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In October 2023 a review of this document was completed by the Emergency Call Prioritisation Advisory Group (ECPAG, NHS England) and the National Ambulance Service Medical Director’s Group (NASMeD, a combination of Ambulance Chief Executives) to ensure it remains fit for purpose.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 1 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Changes to overdose ambulance categorisation are determined by the Clinical Coding Review Group and Emergency Call Prioritisation Advisory Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Recommendation that concerns and proposals for change should be raised with the Clinical Coding Review Group (CCRG) and ECPAG.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 1 December 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share key learning nationally and regionally.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 December 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share key learning nationally and regionally.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 4 · response
Published 1 December 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026