PFD report

Abigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 May 2026•Essex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Failure to prevent access to ligature materials
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of self-harm items in inpatient settings
  2. Lack of appropriate care plans and risk assessments for known self-harm risk
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably develop and review risk-reduction plansPart of recurring concern: Inadequate safety planning for acute mental-health deterioration and suicide riskPart of recurring concern: Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk
  3. Use of inappropriate or untrained staff for enhanced observation
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable patient observation arrangements
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Include enhanced supervision in mandatory training for staff providing enhanced supervision to patients.

    Stated by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 August 2026.
  2. Action

    Provide specialist Learning Disability Team and Autism Lead support to clinical teams developing individual care plans and making reasonable adjustments.

    Stated by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 August 2026.
  3. Action

    Perform environmental risk assessments for clinical and non-clinical areas before placing potentially at-risk patients there.

    Stated by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 August 2026.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    No evidence was identified that Trust-employed security staff were allocated to patients that night, as would usually have been documented.

    Stated by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prevent access to ligature materials

Wider context from the report

“3. Abbi at times had to be physically and chemically restrained due to the level of distress and harm to herself. During her admissions Abbi was able to access ligature material that she tied around her neck on multiple occasions over multiple days including her socks, cords from her clothing and pull cords in the bathroom. There were no appropriate care plan and risk assessments to mitigate a significant known risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of self-harm items in inpatient settings.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of appropriate care plans and risk assessments for known self-harm risk

Wider context from the report

“3. Abbi at times had to be physically and chemically restrained due to the level of distress and harm to herself. During her admissions Abbi was able to access ligature material that she tied around her neck on multiple occasions over multiple days including her socks, cords from her clothing and pull cords in the bathroom. There were no appropriate care plan and risk assessments to mitigate a significant known risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably develop and review risk-reduction plans; Inadequate safety planning for acute mental-health deterioration and suicide risk; Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of inappropriate or untrained staff for enhanced observation

Wider context from the report

“2. For a period of time Abbi was left under the observation of staff that were security personnel and were not appropriate or trained to undertake this work. Male security staff were informed that Abbi should use a commode due to her presenting risks and there were not sufficient trained female staff available. There had been a previous incident where actions taken to restrain Abbi by security personnel caused her trauma and there had been an allegation of assault, this was not considered in this admission. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable patient observation arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of communication adjustments and plans for autistic patients with learning difficulties

Wider context from the report

“6. No adjustments or plans were made for communication for Abbi as a patient with Autism and learning difficulty ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide required reasonable adjustments for patients with disabilities.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of an unsuitable hospital setting for a patient actively attempting suicide

Wider context from the report

“4. Abbi was a complex mental health patient awaiting assessment under the Mental Health Act and was being cared for in a part of the hospital that was not suitable for a patient who was actively attempting to take her life. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain required supervision when staff attend to other patients

Wider context from the report

“5. Staff left Abbi unsupervised during the admission to attend to other patients that permitted her to tie ligatures. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to implement protective measures for people at risk of self-harm; Failure to maintain required continuous patient observation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to incorporate relevant previous restraint and trauma history into admission care

Wider context from the report

“2. For a period of time Abbi was left under the observation of staff that were security personnel and were not appropriate or trained to undertake this work. Male security staff were informed that Abbi should use a commode due to her presenting risks and there were not sufficient trained female staff available. There had been a previous incident where actions taken to restrain Abbi by security personnel caused her trauma and there had been an allegation of assault, this was not considered in this admission. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to incorporate relevant clinical history and diagnoses into care decisions; Failure to provide trauma-informed hospital care; Unreliable admission assessment of patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient trained staffing for enhanced observations of patients at risk of severe self-harm

Wider context from the report

“1. There were not sufficient trained staff to conduct the enhanced observations required to monitor Abbi with her known risk of severe self-harm whilst she was awaiting assessment under the Mental Health Act and actively attempting to take her own life. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity; Unreliable patient observation arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include enhanced supervision in mandatory training for staff providing enhanced supervision to patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Enhanced Supervision is part of mandatory training for all staff who are involved with providing enhanced supervision to patients.”

Source location

Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 13 August 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide specialist Learning Disability Team and Autism Lead support to clinical teams developing individual care plans and making reasonable adjustments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our specialist Learning Disabilities (‘LD’) Team is trained to support and advise staff on patient communication needs; any sensory needs or sensitivities; pain recognition; interaction with medical history and any medication regimens; and to ensure reasonable adjustments are considered in line with the Equality Act 2010 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005. For example, this may be facilitating a patient being placed in a quiet area away from populated waiting rooms and information being given that is free of jargon and medical terminology.”

Source location

Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 13 August 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Perform environmental risk assessments for clinical and non-clinical areas before placing potentially at-risk patients there.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our Policy for Ligature and Self Harm Awareness require environmental risk assessments to be performed in regard to clinical and non-clinical areas. These risk assessments are considered by staff before placing a potentially at-risk patient within the area.”

Source location

Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 13 August 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use Learning Disability and Autism Health Passports to identify communication and sensory needs and guide reasonable adjustments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For patients with Learning Disabilities, a Hospital Passport should be completed which includes questions such as ‘How I communicate and how you communicate with me’ and any sensory issues which may impact communication.”

Source location

Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 13 August 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require ligature risk assessments, including consideration of clothing as ligature material, with documented rationale and mitigating actions where items remain.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am aware that the Court has been provided with an updated copy of the Trust’s Policy for Ligature and Self Harm Awareness.”

Source location

Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 13 August 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement enhanced supervision and engagement policy with risk-level assessment, staffing escalation, supervision handovers, daily review and family or carer involvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that the Court has been provided with an updated copy of the Trust’s Policy for Enhanced Supervision and Engagement. This policy strengthens our assessment and guidance for patients requiring enhanced supervision as per the attached tool.”

Source location

Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 13 August 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No evidence was identified that Trust-employed security staff were allocated to patients that night, as would usually have been documented.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We acknowledge the concerns of HM Coroner that lack of staffing led to the provision of a security guard in order to support the Mental Health Team. We have not identified any evidence of a Trust-employed security staff being allocated to patients that night, as would usually be documented. In any event, we are not able to comment on staffing of the mental health team or how that fell within the remit of Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust (EPUT).”

Source location

Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 13 August 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for mental health team staffing falls within Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust's remit, not this Trust's.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We acknowledge the concerns of HM Coroner that lack of staffing led to the provision of a security guard in order to support the Mental Health Team. We have not identified any evidence of a Trust-employed security staff being allocated to patients that night, as would usually be documented. In any event, we are not able to comment on staffing of the mental health team or how that fell within the remit of Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust (EPUT).”

Source location

Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 13 August 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Staffing was adequate on 26 January 2022, with 15 registered nurses and 9 healthcare assistants against an optimum of 16 nurses and 9 assistants.

    Stated by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Staffing was adequate on 26 January 2022, with 15 registered nurses and 9 healthcare assistants against an optimum of 16 nurses and 9 assistants.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Upon review of the relevant rotas, we can confirm that staffing on the night of 26.01.22 was adequate with 15 Registered Nurses and 9 Health care assistants and one registered Nurse that worked a twilight shift 1500-0300. The optimum staffing levels at that time for a night shift was 16 Registered Nurses and 9 Healthcare Assistants.”

Source location

Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 13 August 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026