PFD report

Peter Jonathan Gledhill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Aug 2018•West Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Pathway along a steep embankment overlooking a river
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The Director of Public Health has no statutory powers to review or require fencing along the pathway.

    Stated by Calderdale Borough CouncilOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pathway along a steep embankment overlooking a river

Wider context from the report

“To review safety aspects of the pathway running along the steep embankment overlooking the river and consider the appropriateness of fencing. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Director of Public Health has no statutory powers to review or require fencing along the pathway.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You raised as a matter of concern, “to review safety aspects of the pathway running along the steep embankment overlooking the river and consider the appropriateness of fencing”. You further state that you believed that I, as Director of Public Health, have the power to take such action. Although I am an employee of Calderdale MBC I do not have any statutory powers to take action on such issues.”

Source location

2018-0371-Response-by-Calderdale-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 10 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Council cannot build or maintain fencing because it neither owns the land nor has legal powers or responsibility.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Calderdale MBC have a statutory duty (s.130 Highways Act 1980) to ensure only that the public can enjoy the benefits of the highway. The Council does not own the land and have no legal powers to build a wall or fence, nor have any responsibility to maintain any part of the missing wall.”

Source location

2018-0371-Response-by-Calderdale-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 10 May 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026