PFD report

Barbara Monica May Cooke · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Sep 2014•Isle of Wight

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
5

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 5 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Lack of a protocol for chasing up unresponded District Nurse Service messages
  2. Failure to recognise infection risks from leaving incontinent residents in their own waste
  3. Inadequate staffing levels for meeting residents’ care, medication, comfort and dignity needs
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient care-home staffing capacity for residents’ required care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a protocol for chasing up unresponded District Nurse Service messages

Wider context from the report

“3. I am concerned that there appears to be no protocol at Waxham House to chase up the District Nurse Service if they haven’t responded to a message within 24 ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise infection risks from leaving incontinent residents in their own waste

Wider context from the report

“2. I am concerned that the Waxham House Residential Care Home didn’t recognise the obvious risks of infection of leaving an incontinent lady sitting in her own waste when she was prone to sacral sores, and almost certainly had at least one at the point at which she was left sitting in her own urine and excrement for two and half hours on 30th March 2014. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate staffing levels for meeting residents’ care, medication, comfort and dignity needs

Wider context from the report

“1. During the course of the evidence, it became clear that the resident to staff ratio of 20:2 during between 2 p.m. and 9 p.m. was inadequate to deal with all the residents’ needs at Waxham House. (The staffing levels at other times also appeared inadequate for the numbers of residents.) The staffing levels did not allow for one staff member to safely distribute medication to the residents without interruption; provide teas for the residents and cater for their other reasonable needs in an acceptable timeframe. I was concerned that residents were being left for two and a half hours, sitting in their own excrement, waiting to be taken to the toilet and cleaned, and that there were insufficient staff to attend to a resident who was clearly dying. Moreover, I am concerned that there were insufficient staff members to escort residents away from a resident who was being attended to by paramedics, thereby denying this lady any dignity in her last moments. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient care-home staffing capacity for residents’ required care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of admission recording of open safeguarding concerns

Wider context from the report

“4. I am concerned that there does not appear to be a system in place at St Mary’s Hospital to record on admission that a patient is the subject of an open Safeguarding concern. (In this case, the subject of the Safeguarding alert was an adult, but this concern relates to both adults and children.) ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording of safeguarding information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of automatic coroner referral for deaths of inpatients subject to safeguarding alerts

Wider context from the report

“5. I am further concerned that there is currently no system in place at St Mary’s Hospital to automatically contact the Coroner to refer the matter for investigation when a person who is the subject of a Safeguarding alert dies whilst an inpatient in the Hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably report deaths to coroners.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of automatic safeguarding-team notification of deaths of inpatients subject to open safeguarding alerts

Wider context from the report

“6. I am concerned that there is currently no system in place at St Mary’s Hospital to automatically notify the IOW Safeguarding Team if someone who is the subject of an open safeguarding alert dies whilst an inpatient in the Hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to act appropriately on safeguarding referrals and notices.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/5

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.