PFD report

Barbara Turner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Oct 2016•Derby and Derbyshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to provide resuscitation equipment and drugs for medical emergencies during transfer
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes
  2. Failure to provide appropriate vital signs monitoring during transfer to and from the CT scanner
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes
  3. Failure of resuscitation call-out criteria to identify critically ill unresponsive patients with initially normal vital signs
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable activation of emergency medical response teams
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide resuscitation equipment and drugs for medical emergencies during transfer

Wider context from the report

“(2) The method by which Mrs Turner was conveyed to the CT Scanner and back to the ward was described by the ITU consultant, who gave evidence, as ‘dangerous.’ He stated that at the very least Mrs Turner should have been escorted by an anaesthetist and ODA, with appropriate vital signs monitoring and resuscitation equipment and drugs to deal with any medical emergency en route and equipment and drugs to protect and manage her airway. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide appropriate vital signs monitoring during transfer to and from the CT scanner

Wider context from the report

“(2) The method by which Mrs Turner was conveyed to the CT Scanner and back to the ward was described by the ITU consultant, who gave evidence, as ‘dangerous.’ He stated that at the very least Mrs Turner should have been escorted by an anaesthetist and ODA, with appropriate vital signs monitoring and resuscitation equipment and drugs to deal with any medical emergency en route and equipment and drugs to protect and manage her airway. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of resuscitation call-out criteria to identify critically ill unresponsive patients with initially normal vital signs

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Trust Policy and Protocol for Resuscitation states at Appendix 3 that the call out criteria for the Adult Resuscitation Team is : All Cardiac Arrests All Respiratory arrests Any Unresponsive patient or visitor with Heart rate > 150 Heart rate < 40 Respiratory rate >40 Respiratory rate < 8 Systolic BP < 80 mmHg Oxygen Saturations < 90% Had these criteria been applied to Mrs Turner then the resuscitation team would not have been called, despite clinicians who gave evidence to the court that she was critically ill. The court heard evidence that person's suffering an intracerebral event or head injury can be critically ill and in need of resuscitation but have initial normal vital signs parameters. It may be that in the policy and protocol the parameters for critically ill unresponsive patients are too broad and as a consequence a proportion of critically ill patients will be denied the best possible chance of being treated by a skilled resuscitation team. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable activation of emergency medical response teams.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide appropriately qualified clinical escort during transfer to and from the CT scanner

Wider context from the report

“(2) The method by which Mrs Turner was conveyed to the CT Scanner and back to the ward was described by the ITU consultant, who gave evidence, as ‘dangerous.’ He stated that at the very least Mrs Turner should have been escorted by an anaesthetist and ODA, with appropriate vital signs monitoring and resuscitation equipment and drugs to deal with any medical emergency en route and equipment and drugs to protect and manage her airway. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide equipment and drugs to protect and manage the airway during transfer

Wider context from the report

“(2) The method by which Mrs Turner was conveyed to the CT Scanner and back to the ward was described by the ITU consultant, who gave evidence, as ‘dangerous.’ He stated that at the very least Mrs Turner should have been escorted by an anaesthetist and ODA, with appropriate vital signs monitoring and resuscitation equipment and drugs to deal with any medical emergency en route and equipment and drugs to protect and manage her airway. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.