Investigation and inquest
On 28.7.21 an investigation was commenced into the death of Gary McDonald, a prisoner at HMP Hewell, who died at the prison on 21.7.22, being 49 years of age. This investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 16.9.22.
The medical cause of death was:
1a hanging.
The conclusion of the inquest was as follows:
“Gary McDonald died as the result of suicide.”
Circumstances of the death
At the time of his death Mr. McDonald had spent nearly 4 months on remand at HMP Hewell awaiting trial. On 21.7.21 he was found deceased in his cell at HMP Hewell having apparently suspended himself ████████ Although his medical history included a diagnosis of depression ( dating from 2011 ) and two recorded episodes of overdoses ( in 2012 and 2020 ), he had never given staff at the prison any reason to believe that he might have been struggling with his mental health throughout his time there.
Coroner’s concerns
1) During his initial healthcare screening appointment on the evening he arrived at HMP Hewell ( 25.3.21 ) and his secondary healthcare screening appointment the following day, Mr. McDonald denied any mental health issues, and denied any current thoughts of suicide or self-harm. His community GP records were requested and were received by the prison on 30.3.21; these showed a previous history of depression, and two previous drug overdoses, the most recent of which had been only 7 months earlier;
2) Despite this history, no appointment was made with Mr. McDonald by the healthcare or mental healthcare teams to follow this up with him, and discuss his mental health in more depth;
3) In his evidence to the inquest, the current Head of Healthcare at the prison conceded that it might have been appropriate for someone to have visited Mr. McDonald, raised it him what the GP summary had shown, and asked him if he would like any help, but that he would only have expected any such follow-up if there had been any current concerns about his mental health. He further confirmed that there would have been no automatic follow-up about this, even if staff believed that Mr. McDonald may have deliberately misled them about his mental health history during his healthcare screening appointments;
4) In subsequent correspondence to my office, the Head of Healthcare has suggested that it might be appropriate to delay a prisoner’s secondary healthcare screening appointment until his GP records have been obtained and scrutinised, so that concerns about any history set out in those records can be raised with the prisoner. That proposal is due to be raised at the prison's next Local Quality Assurance Meeting;
5) I am concerned that there is currently no system in place at HMP Hewell to follow up with a prisoner any discrepancy between the mental health history which he has disclosed on arrival at the prison, and that revealed in his community GP records. Experience suggests that a prisoner with a recorded history of mental health issues, particularly one which includes a recent episode of attempted suicide or self-harm through overdose, may be at his most vulnerable during his first days and weeks at a prison, and having been reluctant to disclose such issues for any number of reasons ( e.g. fear, embarrassment ), may be reassured to be told that healthcare staff at the prison are aware of that history and can provide confidential support. In my view, without routine follow-up in such cases, there remains a significant risk that a prisoner’s recent significant history of suicide or self-harm may be overlooked in those important early days and weeks in prison, and that such prisoners will therefore be at an increased risk of further episodes of attempted suicide during that period.