PFD report

Karen Ravenscroft · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 May 2016•Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to re-assess venous thromboembolism risk 24 hours after admission
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolism
  2. Unavailability of electronic prescribing for drugs prescribed in the Accident & Emergency Department
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of electronic prescription systems to support reliable prescribing and dispensing
  3. Failure to prescribe pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for patients at high risk of venous thromboembolism without contraindications
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolismPart of recurring concern: Unsafe medication prescribing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to re-assess venous thromboembolism risk 24 hours after admission

Wider context from the report

“2. Despite Trust VTE Guidelines recommending re-assessment of VTE risk at 24 hours after admission, no further risk assessment took place nor was there application of mechanical thromboprophylaxis like Ted Stocking or Flowtron Pump. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolism.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of electronic prescribing for drugs prescribed in the Accident & Emergency Department

Wider context from the report

“3. Evidence revealed that drugs prescribed in the Accident & Emergency Department could not be done electronically without the doctor going on the ward in order to be able to do that. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of electronic prescription systems to support reliable prescribing and dispensing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prescribe pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for patients at high risk of venous thromboembolism without contraindications

Wider context from the report

“1. The initial venous thromboembolism risk assessment done during the admission as per the Trust’s VTE Guidelines stated that Mrs Ravenscroft was at high risk for VTE with no bleeding risk and no contra-indication for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Despite that no thromboprophylaxis was prescribed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolism; Unsafe medication prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to apply mechanical thromboprophylaxis when indicated

Wider context from the report

“2. Despite Trust VTE Guidelines recommending re-assessment of VTE risk at 24 hours after admission, no further risk assessment took place nor was there application of mechanical thromboprophylaxis like Ted Stocking or Flowtron Pump. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolism.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.