Margaret Elsie Clarke · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Feb 2015•South Yorkshire (Eastern)

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of guidance for effective cleaning of fixed shower heads

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Health and Safety Executive

    Refer the coroner’s letter concerning shower-head safety to Doncaster Council Trading Standards.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. City of Doncaster Council

    The Health and Safety Executive should review its Legionella guidance on showers and the installation and maintenance of shower systems.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. City of Doncaster Council

    The showerhead may not itself be unsafe; Legionella risk may arise from the whole installation and water-system management rather than component design.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  3. City of Doncaster Council

    Permanently installed showerheads are likely supplied to the plumbing trade and therefore fall outside the regulations’ remit.

    Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  4. Health and Safety Executive

    The concern was referred to Doncaster Council’s Trading Standards Department as the relevant enforcement body.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  5. Health and Safety Executive

    Enforcement action under the General Product Safety Regulations 2005 cannot be undertaken because enforcement powers are unavailable.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance for effective cleaning of fixed shower heads

Wider context from the report

“(1) There is no guidance for effective cleaning of fixed shower heads increasingly used in private and public leisure facilities. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refer the coroner’s letter concerning shower-head safety to Doncaster Council Trading Standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Shower heads are designed, manufactured and supplied under the General Product Safety Regulations 2005. HSE has no enforcement powers under these Regulations so I have passed your letter to your local Trading Standards Department at Doncaster Council, Civic Office, Waterdale, Doncaster, DN1 3BU.”

Source location

2015-0046-Response-by-HSE
Page 1 · response
Published 9 February 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Health and Safety Executive should review its Legionella guidance on showers and the installation and maintenance of shower systems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It would seem to me, particularly if I am correct that cleaning the showerhead alone could be ineffective, that the appropriate response to this situation would be for the HSE to review the guidance that they publish regarding Legionnaires disease to consider if greater emphasis needs to be put on showers being a suitable vector, and the required installation and maintenance of shower systems. I have copied ████████ in on this letter to allow him to comment further.”

Source location

2015-0046-Response-by-Doncaster-Borough-Council
Page 3 · response
Published 9 February 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The showerhead may not itself be unsafe; Legionella risk may arise from the whole installation and water-system management rather than component design.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Secondly, I have doubts about whether it is the shower head itself that is unsafe.”

Source location

2015-0046-Response-by-Doncaster-Borough-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 9 February 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Permanently installed showerheads are likely supplied to the plumbing trade and therefore fall outside the regulations’ remit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Firstly, there is the question of whether a shower head which requires permanent installation, rather than a detachable hose and head, is intended for consumers. It is much more likely that it is intended to be supplied to the plumbing trade and therefore outside the remit of the regulations.”

Source location

2015-0046-Response-by-Doncaster-Borough-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 9 February 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The concern was referred to Doncaster Council’s Trading Standards Department as the relevant enforcement body.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Shower heads are designed, manufactured and supplied under the General Product Safety Regulations 2005. HSE has no enforcement powers under these Regulations so I have passed your letter to your local Trading Standards Department at Doncaster Council, Civic Office, Waterdale, Doncaster, DN1 3BU.”

Source location

2015-0046-Response-by-HSE
Page 1 · response
Published 9 February 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Enforcement action under the General Product Safety Regulations 2005 cannot be undertaken because enforcement powers are unavailable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Shower heads are designed, manufactured and supplied under the General Product Safety Regulations 2005. HSE has no enforcement powers under these Regulations so I have passed your letter to your local Trading Standards Department at Doncaster Council, Civic Office, Waterdale, Doncaster, DN1 3BU.”

Source location

2015-0046-Response-by-HSE
Page 1 · response
Published 9 February 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026