PFD report

Craig Steadman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Aug 2024•Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to share and discuss investigation findings and recommendations with relevant prison and healthcare staff
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable safety investigation reports and disclosure
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Consider investigation recommendations nationally and produce and share learning bulletins across the wider prison estate.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 August 2024.
  2. Action

    Identify relevant staff and share, discuss, and explain investigation findings, learning, and reports with them.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 August 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to share and discuss investigation findings and recommendations with relevant prison and healthcare staff

Wider context from the report

“There were several investigations into Craig Steadman’s death including a post incident review by HMP Winchester, the PPO,and the prison healthcare provider. Various recommendations flowed from the above. However upon questioning of various members of staff called to give evidence at the Inquest it became clear that several of them were not aware of the findings of the investigations nor the recommendations. The reports had not been shared with staff directly involved with Craig during his recent time in custody. It is not possible for learning to be fully disseminated and acted upon if there is no process for sharing the findings of those organisations tasked with investigating deaths in custody and discussing these with the relevant Prison/Healthcare staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safety investigation reports and disclosure.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider investigation recommendations nationally and produce and share learning bulletins across the wider prison estate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At a national level, all recommendations made following an investigation into a death in custody are considered by the national learning team and are used to produce learning bulletins that are shared across the wider prison estate.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 12 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Identify relevant staff and share, discuss, and explain investigation findings, learning, and reports with them.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have received assurances from the Governor at HMP Winchester that the investigation report into the death of Mr Steadman has now been shared and discussed with the relevant staff. Going forward, once an investigation report into the circumstances of a death in custody is received, the Head of Safety will identify the relevant members of staff and discuss the findings with them. This will include sharing the report, highlighting any areas of learning and ensuring that the member of staff understands the content. Additionally, any learning identified that concerns the prison more generally will be acted upon at an early stage, ensuring effective changes are made. This will include liaising with other agencies, such as the healthcare provider.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 12 August 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Act early on prison-wide learning by making effective changes and liaising with relevant agencies, including healthcare providers.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 August 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Act early on prison-wide learning by making effective changes and liaising with relevant agencies, including healthcare providers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have received assurances from the Governor at HMP Winchester that the investigation report into the death of Mr Steadman has now been shared and discussed with the relevant staff. Going forward, once an investigation report into the circumstances of a death in custody is received, the Head of Safety will identify the relevant members of staff and discuss the findings with them. This will include sharing the report, highlighting any areas of learning and ensuring that the member of staff understands the content. Additionally, any learning identified that concerns the prison more generally will be acted upon at an early stage, ensuring effective changes are made. This will include liaising with other agencies, such as the healthcare provider.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 12 August 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026