PFD report

Anne HAWKES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Apr 2024•South Yorkshire (Eastern)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of communication between services for wound management
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care servicesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable communication with cardiology teams about patient care
  2. Lack of automatic cardiology referral for in-patients with known cardiac failure
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely cardiology assessment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Communicate Tissue Viability Nurse referral criteria and raise awareness of the service across the Trust through collaborative Quality Governance work.

    Stated by the Rotherham NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 4 April 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Automatic referral is not adopted because it would place disproportionate additional pressure on the service without benefiting patients.

    Stated by the Rotherham NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of communication between services for wound management

Wider context from the report

“(2) The lack of communication between services within the Trust (surgery, cardiology and tissue viability) led to a delayed and incohesive approach to the wound management. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services; Unreliable communication with cardiology teams about patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of automatic cardiology referral for in-patients with known cardiac failure

Wider context from the report

“(1) The delayed cardiology referral whilst Mrs Hawkes was on an orthopaedic ward led to sub-optimal management of her cardiac failure which in turn is implicated in her death. There is no procedure in place at the Trust for Clinicians to automatically refer in-patients with known cardiac failure to cardiology for expert management. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely cardiology assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate Tissue Viability Nurse referral criteria and raise awareness of the service across the Trust through collaborative Quality Governance work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On this occasion, it was recognised at the Inquest that the communication between orthopaedics, cardiology and our Tissue Viability Nurse services (TVN) could have been improved upon. However, this is not a reflection on the overall communication with the TVN service. Tracey Green, Tissue Viability Nurse, gave evidence that there exists a good working relationship between the surgical teams and the TVN service. It was acknowledged that TVN could have been contacted earlier when Mrs Hawkes was on Ward A1 when her wound started to break down and for this we reiterate our apology.”

Source location

Response from The Rotherham
Page 3 · response
Published 4 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Automatic referral is not adopted because it would place disproportionate additional pressure on the service without benefiting patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I acknowledge that you have highlighted there is no automatic referral for in-patients with known cardiac failure. It should be acknowledged that not all patients with known heart failure mandate a referral to the Heart Failure Service, unless there are signs of decompensation (including shortness of breath, decreasing oxygen saturations and tachycardia) and/or fluid overload (visible oedema and/or changes in body weight). We have carefully considered this and concluded that automatic referral would place a disproportionate amount of additional pressure on the service which ultimately would not prove beneficial for patients.”

Source location

Response from The Rotherham
Page 2 · response
Published 4 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Not all inpatients with known heart failure require automatic referral; referral is indicated when decompensation or fluid overload signs occur.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The aforementioned process is in addition to clinicians recognising other signs and symptoms of heart failure which also prompt referral to cardiology/heart failure service. Furthermore, orthopaedic inpatients are also reviewed by an orthogeriatrician during the Friday ward round where specialist input and guidance can be sought as to the medical management of the patient.”

Source location

Response from The Rotherham
Page 2 · response
Published 4 April 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Implement Meditech prompts for daily heart-failure weight monitoring and referral to the Heart Failure Specialist Nursing Team after significant weight gain.

    Stated by the Rotherham NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 April 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement Meditech prompts for daily heart-failure weight monitoring and referral to the Heart Failure Specialist Nursing Team after significant weight gain.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that during the Inquest, it was discussed at length that a crucial aspect of heart failure management is the fluid balance with the view of preventing fluid overload and to monitor this, a patient’s weight in an important consideration. It was recognised and accepted at the Inquest that Mrs Hawkes’ admission weight was not accurate. Since this incident, additional prompts have been incorporated into Meditech to direct clinicians to complete daily weights for patients with heart failure. More specifically, the prompts have been made to the Inpatient Admission Summary (a checklist completed for every patient irrespective of where they are admitted to), the Trauma & Orthopaedic Admission, Trauma & Orthopaedic Femoral Fracture Admission and Nursing Admission Checklist PCS Assessment.”

Source location

Response from The Rotherham
Page 2 · response
Published 4 April 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026