Anne HAWKES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Apr 2024•South Yorkshire (Eastern)

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of communication between services for wound management
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care servicesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable communication with cardiology teams about patient care
  2. Lack of automatic cardiology referral for in-patients with known cardiac failure
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely cardiology assessment

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. the Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust

    Communicate Tissue Viability Nurse referral criteria and raise awareness of the service across the Trust through collaborative Quality Governance work.

  2. the Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust

    Implement Meditech prompts for daily heart-failure weight monitoring and referral to the Heart Failure Specialist Nursing Team after significant weight gain.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. the Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust

    Automatic referral is not adopted because it would place disproportionate additional pressure on the service without benefiting patients.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  2. the Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust

    Not all inpatients with known heart failure require automatic referral; referral is indicated when decompensation or fluid overload signs occur.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of communication between services for wound management

Wider context from the report

“(2) The lack of communication between services within the Trust (surgery, cardiology and tissue viability) led to a delayed and incohesive approach to the wound management. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services; Unreliable communication with cardiology teams about patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of automatic cardiology referral for in-patients with known cardiac failure

Wider context from the report

“(1) The delayed cardiology referral whilst Mrs Hawkes was on an orthopaedic ward led to sub-optimal management of her cardiac failure which in turn is implicated in her death. There is no procedure in place at the Trust for Clinicians to automatically refer in-patients with known cardiac failure to cardiology for expert management. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely cardiology assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate Tissue Viability Nurse referral criteria and raise awareness of the service across the Trust through collaborative Quality Governance work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On this occasion, it was recognised at the Inquest that the communication between orthopaedics, cardiology and our Tissue Viability Nurse services (TVN) could have been improved upon. However, this is not a reflection on the overall communication with the TVN service. Tracey Green, Tissue Viability Nurse, gave evidence that there exists a good working relationship between the surgical teams and the TVN service. It was acknowledged that TVN could have been contacted earlier when Mrs Hawkes was on Ward A1 when her wound started to break down and for this we reiterate our apology.”

Source location

Response from The Rotherham
Page 3 · response
Published 4 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement Meditech prompts for daily heart-failure weight monitoring and referral to the Heart Failure Specialist Nursing Team after significant weight gain.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that during the Inquest, it was discussed at length that a crucial aspect of heart failure management is the fluid balance with the view of preventing fluid overload and to monitor this, a patient’s weight in an important consideration. It was recognised and accepted at the Inquest that Mrs Hawkes’ admission weight was not accurate. Since this incident, additional prompts have been incorporated into Meditech to direct clinicians to complete daily weights for patients with heart failure. More specifically, the prompts have been made to the Inpatient Admission Summary (a checklist completed for every patient irrespective of where they are admitted to), the Trauma & Orthopaedic Admission, Trauma & Orthopaedic Femoral Fracture Admission and Nursing Admission Checklist PCS Assessment.”

Source location

Response from The Rotherham
Page 2 · response
Published 4 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Automatic referral is not adopted because it would place disproportionate additional pressure on the service without benefiting patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I acknowledge that you have highlighted there is no automatic referral for in-patients with known cardiac failure. It should be acknowledged that not all patients with known heart failure mandate a referral to the Heart Failure Service, unless there are signs of decompensation (including shortness of breath, decreasing oxygen saturations and tachycardia) and/or fluid overload (visible oedema and/or changes in body weight). We have carefully considered this and concluded that automatic referral would place a disproportionate amount of additional pressure on the service which ultimately would not prove beneficial for patients.”

Source location

Response from The Rotherham
Page 2 · response
Published 4 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Not all inpatients with known heart failure require automatic referral; referral is indicated when decompensation or fluid overload signs occur.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The aforementioned process is in addition to clinicians recognising other signs and symptoms of heart failure which also prompt referral to cardiology/heart failure service. Furthermore, orthopaedic inpatients are also reviewed by an orthogeriatrician during the Friday ward round where specialist input and guidance can be sought as to the medical management of the patient.”

Source location

Response from The Rotherham
Page 2 · response
Published 4 April 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026