PFD report

Anthony John Preston · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Aug 2016•Rutland and North Leicestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of support for high-risk patients and their main carers after discharge
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after dischargePart of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  2. Failure to maintain documentary proof of discharge notification calls
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge documentationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  3. Failure to provide immediate written discharge and high-risk notification to the crisis team
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable crisis team care provisionPart of recurring concern: Unreliable crisis-team access and communicationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processesPart of recurring concern: Unsafe discharge, closure or withdrawal of mental health services
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of support for high-risk patients and their main carers after discharge

Wider context from the report

“(4) As a result, Mr Preston and his main carer ████████ were left without support at a time when he was at high risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge; Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain documentary proof of discharge notification calls

Wider context from the report

“(2) The system for discharge of patients, whereby a nurse makes contact with (in this case) the Leicestershire Crisis Team does not appear to have been robust. There was no documentary proof of the telephone call. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge documentation; Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide immediate written discharge and high-risk notification to the crisis team

Wider context from the report

“(3) There was no immediate follow up by email or fax to the Crisis Team to notify the discharge, and the fact that Mr Preston was at high risk because of the anxiety created when he was living at home. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable crisis team care provision; Unreliable crisis-team access and communication; Unreliable hospital discharge processes; Unsafe discharge, closure or withdrawal of mental health services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Severe anxiety and deepening depression associated with living at home

Wider context from the report

“(1) Mr Preston had demonstrated, in his early return from home leave in the first few days of November, that living at home was a source of substantial stress, and likely to cause him severe anxiety and deepen his depression. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.