PFD report

Bronwyn Ann WILLIAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Sep 2017•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Use of a slow, cumbersome and mishap-prone postal method for urgent referrals
  2. Delays in arranging maxillofacial appointments after referral
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable and delayed surgical referral and review
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Apply for NHS net email access and provide the required prerequisite information.

    Stated by KindandentalStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 September 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The Trust cannot locally resolve the issues preventing dentists from using the electronic referral system, so the residual risk necessarily remains.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of a slow, cumbersome and mishap-prone postal method for urgent referrals

Wider context from the report

“1. I heard at inquest that the urgent referral from Kindandental to the Homerton was made not by logging on to a portal, or by email, or by fax, but by post. This seems unduly slow, cumbersome and prone to mishap. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in arranging maxillofacial appointments after referral

Wider context from the report

“2. Following Ms Williams’ attendance at the dental surgery on 4 May, an appointment with the maxillofacial unit was made for 30 May, then cancelled by the Homerton on 23 May and re-fixed for 19 June. This date is nearly seven weeks post referral. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable and delayed surgical referral and review.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Apply for NHS net email access and provide the required prerequisite information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have applied, and have subsequently provided the pre-requisite information required, for the use of an NHS net email address. This is the email system for NHS electronic referrals (to comply with NHS patient confidentiality requirements).”

Source location

2017-0215-Response-by-Kindandental
Page 1 · response
Published 25 September 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust cannot locally resolve the issues preventing dentists from using the electronic referral system, so the residual risk necessarily remains.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have attached the action plan developed in response to the PFD notice. We are one of the most advanced Trusts in London in relation to fully implementing electronic referrals via the e-RS system, known as Choose and Book, for GPs by April 2018. Unfortunately, although the system could in theory accept referrals from dentists, in practice they cannot use the system for reasons discussed in the action plan. We cannot fix these issues locally, and are therefore taking actions to mitigate the risk that necessarily remains.”

Source location

2017-0215-Response-by-Homerton-University-Hospital-NHS
Page 1 · response
Published 25 September 2017

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Implement electronic referrals through the e-RS system for general practitioners by April 2018.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 25 September 2017.
  2. 2

    Review the referral protocol and create and display a laminated checklist for collecting correct, current referral information.

    Stated by KindandentalStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 September 2017.
  3. 3

    Review and fully update referral pathways, then disseminate the updated information to all dentists.

    Stated by KindandentalStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 September 2017.
  4. 4

    Reiterate to staff the requirement to log all referrals fully and correctly.

    Stated by KindandentalStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 September 2017.
  5. 5

    Communicate the requirement to verify patient identity, address, postcode and GP details at referrals and general check-ups.

    Stated by KindandentalStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 September 2017.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement electronic referrals through the e-RS system for general practitioners by April 2018.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have attached the action plan developed in response to the PFD notice. We are one of the most advanced Trusts in London in relation to fully implementing electronic referrals via the e-RS system, known as Choose and Book, for GPs by April 2018. Unfortunately, although the system could in theory accept referrals from dentists, in practice they cannot use the system for reasons discussed in the action plan. We cannot fix these issues locally, and are therefore taking actions to mitigate the risk that necessarily remains.”

Source location

2017-0215-Response-by-Homerton-University-Hospital-NHS
Page 1 · response
Published 25 September 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the referral protocol and create and display a laminated checklist for collecting correct, current referral information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also reviewed our referral pathways and fully updated the information therein. This has been disseminated to all dentists via email. Our computer system logs and manages referrals. We have reviewed this process and re-iterated to staff the importance of all referrals being fully and correctly logged. Our protocol for all referrals has been reviewed and a check list has been created to be followed and adhered to so that correct and up to date information is gathered for the referral. The check list is a laminated document displayed in each surgery.”

Source location

2017-0215-Response-by-Kindandental
Page 2 · response
Published 25 September 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and fully update referral pathways, then disseminate the updated information to all dentists.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also reviewed our referral pathways and fully updated the information therein. This has been disseminated to all dentists via email. Our computer system logs and manages referrals. We have reviewed this process and re-iterated to staff the importance of all referrals being fully and correctly logged. Our protocol for all referrals has been reviewed and a check list has been created to be followed and adhered to so that correct and up to date information is gathered for the referral. The check list is a laminated document displayed in each surgery.”

Source location

2017-0215-Response-by-Kindandental
Page 2 · response
Published 25 September 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reiterate to staff the requirement to log all referrals fully and correctly.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also reviewed our referral pathways and fully updated the information therein. This has been disseminated to all dentists via email. Our computer system logs and manages referrals. We have reviewed this process and re-iterated to staff the importance of all referrals being fully and correctly logged. Our protocol for all referrals has been reviewed and a check list has been created to be followed and adhered to so that correct and up to date information is gathered for the referral. The check list is a laminated document displayed in each surgery.”

Source location

2017-0215-Response-by-Kindandental
Page 2 · response
Published 25 September 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate the requirement to verify patient identity, address, postcode and GP details at referrals and general check-ups.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have communicated to all staff (via email and in person) the importance of verifying patient information, full address including post code and GP details, at all points where a referral is made and additionally at general check up appointments.”

Source location

2017-0215-Response-by-Kindandental
Page 2 · response
Published 25 September 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026