PFD report

Ian Keith Brown · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 May 2016•Milton Keynes

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Rising numbers of suicides and self-harm deaths in the prison
  2. Failure to maintain adequate ACCT case management documentation
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systemsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes
  3. Failure to implement previous safety recommendations
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to implement identified safety actions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Implement a designated case-manager system for each offender supported through the ACCT process while the ACCT remains open.

    Stated by National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency GroupStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 May 2016.
  2. Action

    Introduce citizenship groups to increase prisoner involvement in decision-making and support at-risk prisoners.

    Stated by National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 May 2016.
  3. Action

    Operate a quarterly safer-custody taskforce chaired by the Deputy Director to oversee implementation of the review action plan.

    Stated by National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 May 2016.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing prison governance and monitoring processes are considered sufficient to deliver action on HMIP, PPO and Regulation 28 recommendations.

    Stated by National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency GroupExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Rising numbers of suicides and self-harm deaths in the prison

Wider context from the report

“(1)During the course of the evidence I was referred to the most recent report from the HM Inspector of Prisons that highlighted “Recommendations made by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman following previous deaths in custody, such as the need to improve the quality of ACCT case management documentation for prisoners at risk of suicide or self harm, had not been implemented with sufficient rigour. (2) Deaths at the prison from suicide and self harm continue to rise. (3) The recommendation from the Inspectors is that there should be a “prison-wide strategy and action plan to reduce the number of self inflicted deaths and incidents of self harm should be developed urgently. This should be based on detailed data and trend analysis and include implementation of Prison and Probation Ombudsman recommendations. It should also include improvements in the quality of ACCT case management documentation, and the lessons learned from internal investigations into life-threatening incidents.” I have concerns that the recommendations will not be implemented and that past recommendations have been ignored. (4) That despite my previous PFD reports the number of suicides at HMP Woodhill continue to rise. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain adequate ACCT case management documentation

Wider context from the report

“(1)During the course of the evidence I was referred to the most recent report from the HM Inspector of Prisons that highlighted “Recommendations made by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman following previous deaths in custody, such as the need to improve the quality of ACCT case management documentation for prisoners at risk of suicide or self harm, had not been implemented with sufficient rigour. (2) Deaths at the prison from suicide and self harm continue to rise. (3) The recommendation from the Inspectors is that there should be a “prison-wide strategy and action plan to reduce the number of self inflicted deaths and incidents of self harm should be developed urgently. This should be based on detailed data and trend analysis and include implementation of Prison and Probation Ombudsman recommendations. It should also include improvements in the quality of ACCT case management documentation, and the lessons learned from internal investigations into life-threatening incidents.” I have concerns that the recommendations will not be implemented and that past recommendations have been ignored. (4) That despite my previous PFD reports the number of suicides at HMP Woodhill continue to rise. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems; Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to implement previous safety recommendations

Wider context from the report

“(1)During the course of the evidence I was referred to the most recent report from the HM Inspector of Prisons that highlighted “Recommendations made by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman following previous deaths in custody, such as the need to improve the quality of ACCT case management documentation for prisoners at risk of suicide or self harm, had not been implemented with sufficient rigour. (2) Deaths at the prison from suicide and self harm continue to rise. (3) The recommendation from the Inspectors is that there should be a “prison-wide strategy and action plan to reduce the number of self inflicted deaths and incidents of self harm should be developed urgently. This should be based on detailed data and trend analysis and include implementation of Prison and Probation Ombudsman recommendations. It should also include improvements in the quality of ACCT case management documentation, and the lessons learned from internal investigations into life-threatening incidents.” I have concerns that the recommendations will not be implemented and that past recommendations have been ignored. (4) That despite my previous PFD reports the number of suicides at HMP Woodhill continue to rise. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to implement identified safety actions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a designated case-manager system for each offender supported through the ACCT process while the ACCT remains open.

Verbatim wording from the response

“training to 90% of managers who chair ACCT case reviews. A new case review booking system is in place to improve the continuity of case manager attendance and to ensure that all members of the multi-disciplinary team are able to plan their attendance at review meetings. The prison is also implementing a system to provide each offender supported through the ACCT process with a designated case manager throughout the period for which the ACCT remains open. This approach will bring further improvement in the quality and consistency of case reviews and care plans.”

Source location

2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce citizenship groups to increase prisoner involvement in decision-making and support at-risk prisoners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The planned improvements to safety at the prison go much wider than the ACCT process, including: an ‘every contact matters’ approach to the way that staff engage with prisoners; a streamlined early days in custody process, from the point of reception until the end of induction, managed by the residential team; and measures to increase the involvement of prisoners in decision-making, including the introduction of ‘citizenship’ groups to provide support to at-risk prisoners.”

Source location

2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a quarterly safer-custody taskforce chaired by the Deputy Director to oversee implementation of the review action plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As I explained in my letter of 6 February 2016 in response to a previous Regulation 28 report, the Deputy Director for Custody for High Security Prisons established a taskforce to conduct a review of safer custody processes at the prison, and this group now meets quarterly, chaired by the Deputy Director, to oversee the implementation of the action plan to address the recommendations of the review. Through the taskforce extra resources have been provided to the prison to assist in data analysis, focus groups and other research. At the same time the healthcare provider, Central North West London NHS Foundation Trust, completed a review of healthcare services at the prison.”

Source location

2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 26 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver Case Management training to managers who chair ACCT case reviews.

Verbatim wording from the response

“An early example of the improvement that is being driven by the taskforce is in the management of the ACCT process. The establishment has now delivered Case Management”

Source location

2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 26 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a monthly forum chaired by the Deputy Governor to monitor progress on actions responding to death-in-custody recommendations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the recent inspection by HMIP, a monthly forum, chaired by the Deputy Governor, has been introduced to monitor progress on the actions being taken in response to all recommendations relating to the recent deaths in custody. This forum will improve assurance of compliance. A whole establishment action plan, shared by the health provider and the prison, is in place and progress on this is formally monitored monthly and reported to both the prison Senior Management Team meeting and the newly established Clinical Governance meeting.”

Source location

2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 26 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain a whole-establishment action plan with the health provider and formally monitor and report its progress monthly.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the recent inspection by HMIP, a monthly forum, chaired by the Deputy Governor, has been introduced to monitor progress on the actions being taken in response to all recommendations relating to the recent deaths in custody. This forum will improve assurance of compliance. A whole establishment action plan, shared by the health provider and the prison, is in place and progress on this is formally monitored monthly and reported to both the prison Senior Management Team meeting and the newly established Clinical Governance meeting.”

Source location

2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 26 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a case-review booking system to improve case-manager continuity and multidisciplinary team attendance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“training to 90% of managers who chair ACCT case reviews. A new case review booking system is in place to improve the continuity of case manager attendance and to ensure that all members of the multi-disciplinary team are able to plan their attendance at review meetings. The prison is also implementing a system to provide each offender supported through the ACCT process with a designated case manager throughout the period for which the ACCT remains open. This approach will bring further improvement in the quality and consistency of case reviews and care plans.”

Source location

2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing prison governance and monitoring processes are considered sufficient to deliver action on HMIP, PPO and Regulation 28 recommendations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I hope this provides you with assurance that the Governor of HMP Woodhill, and the Deputy Director of Custody for High Security Prisons, have put in place processes and governance that will achieve successful action in response to the recommendations from HMIP and the PPO, and the matters of concern raised in your Regulation 28 reports, and that this will bring the necessary improvements in safety at the prison.”

Source location

2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Streamline the early-days-in-custody process from reception through induction under residential-team management.

    Stated by National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 May 2016.
  2. 2

    Provide additional prison resources for data analysis, focus groups and other safer-custody research.

    Stated by National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency GroupStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 May 2016.
  3. 3

    Introduce an “every contact matters” approach to staff engagement with prisoners.

    Stated by National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 May 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Streamline the early-days-in-custody process from reception through induction under residential-team management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The planned improvements to safety at the prison go much wider than the ACCT process, including: an ‘every contact matters’ approach to the way that staff engage with prisoners; a streamlined early days in custody process, from the point of reception until the end of induction, managed by the residential team; and measures to increase the involvement of prisoners in decision-making, including the introduction of ‘citizenship’ groups to provide support to at-risk prisoners.”

Source location

2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide additional prison resources for data analysis, focus groups and other safer-custody research.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As I explained in my letter of 6 February 2016 in response to a previous Regulation 28 report, the Deputy Director for Custody for High Security Prisons established a taskforce to conduct a review of safer custody processes at the prison, and this group now meets quarterly, chaired by the Deputy Director, to oversee the implementation of the action plan to address the recommendations of the review. Through the taskforce extra resources have been provided to the prison to assist in data analysis, focus groups and other research. At the same time the healthcare provider, Central North West London NHS Foundation Trust, completed a review of healthcare services at the prison.”

Source location

2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 26 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce an “every contact matters” approach to staff engagement with prisoners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The planned improvements to safety at the prison go much wider than the ACCT process, including: an ‘every contact matters’ approach to the way that staff engage with prisoners; a streamlined early days in custody process, from the point of reception until the end of induction, managed by the residential team; and measures to increase the involvement of prisoners in decision-making, including the introduction of ‘citizenship’ groups to provide support to at-risk prisoners.”

Source location

2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026