PFD report

Robert Irwin Norton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Jan 2019•West Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Potential illegibility of painted road markings
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road markings for road-user safety
  2. Potential motorist confusion caused by road layout
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe road design and layout
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Commission a study of similar accidents involving the roundabout and dual-entry exits.

    Stated by Calderdale MBCStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 November 2019.
  2. Action

    Continue regularly inspecting the road lining and renew it when required.

    Stated by Calderdale MBCStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 November 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The road markings were clearly legible and in acceptable condition, contrary to the concern about inadequate or unclear white lining.

    Stated by Calderdale MBCDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Potential illegibility of painted road markings

Wider context from the report

“To consider the existing legibility of the painted road markings ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road markings for road-user safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Potential motorist confusion caused by road layout

Wider context from the report

“To review the existing road lay out in order to prevent potential confusion by motorists ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe road design and layout.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission a study of similar accidents involving the roundabout and dual-entry exits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Overall layout of roundabout and dual entry exits”

Source location

Response from Calderdale Council
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue regularly inspecting the road lining and renew it when required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I will therefore continue to inspect the lining on a regular basis and renew as required.”

Source location

Response from Calderdale Council
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The road markings were clearly legible and in acceptable condition, contrary to the concern about inadequate or unclear white lining.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have now studied photographs of the white lining which were taken by one of my engineers shortly after the accident took place. As you can see from the photograph below, the lining itself is clearly legible which is supported by his overall assessment of the general condition (also included for completeness).”

Source location

Response from Calderdale Council
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026