PFD report

Mikey James Hornby · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Dec 2014•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to immediately admit children when meningitis is a realistic possibility
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely hospital admissionPart of recurring concern: Failure to recognise and respond promptly to suspected meningitisPart of recurring concern: Unreliable emergency access to hospital care
  2. Failure to immediately refer children with infected umbilical cords to hospital at first OOH attendance
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to recognise and respond promptly to suspected meningitisPart of recurring concern: Unreliable emergency access to hospital care
  3. Lack of facility for simple blood testing in the GP out-of-hours setting
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Provide training on managing severely ill children for out-of-hours GPs alongside mandatory and statutory training.

    Stated by North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2014.
  2. Action

    Conduct quarterly clinical audits of practitioners’ records and provide supervision and competency action plans where practice falls short.

    Stated by North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2014.
  3. Action

    Implement NICE feverish-illness guidance in the out-of-hours service using PEWS and assessment templates.

    Stated by North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2014.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The service does not routinely perform paediatric blood tests; referral directly to hospital paediatricians is considered sufficient, rather than using the Emergency Department.

    Stated by North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to immediately admit children when meningitis is a realistic possibility

Wider context from the report

“1. On the first attendance at the OOH service, the attending staff having seen the infected umbilical cord, did not immediately send Mikey to the Hospital (as would have been the correct procedure according to the Consultant Lead Paediatrician who gave evidence to me.) 2. On the second attendance the doctor failed to appreciate the seriousness of the situation and at 10.45 at night sent the child home with a prescription for analgesia (which could not be filled until the following day in any event). The Consultant Paediatrician gave evidence to me “that there was a very high probability that he would have survived” had he been sent to the hospital at this time as he could and would have been administered an intra-venous anti-biotic. 3. If there is any realistic possibility of the condition being meningitis, the child should have been immediately admitted to the hospital. 4. The GP covering the surgery that night indicated that they do not have the facility to take a simple blood test. If this is the case, then they should utilise the adjacent facilities at the Emergency Department of the hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely hospital admission; Failure to recognise and respond promptly to suspected meningitis; Unreliable emergency access to hospital care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to immediately refer children with infected umbilical cords to hospital at first OOH attendance

Wider context from the report

“1. On the first attendance at the OOH service, the attending staff having seen the infected umbilical cord, did not immediately send Mikey to the Hospital (as would have been the correct procedure according to the Consultant Lead Paediatrician who gave evidence to me.) 2. On the second attendance the doctor failed to appreciate the seriousness of the situation and at 10.45 at night sent the child home with a prescription for analgesia (which could not be filled until the following day in any event). The Consultant Paediatrician gave evidence to me “that there was a very high probability that he would have survived” had he been sent to the hospital at this time as he could and would have been administered an intra-venous anti-biotic. 3. If there is any realistic possibility of the condition being meningitis, the child should have been immediately admitted to the hospital. 4. The GP covering the surgery that night indicated that they do not have the facility to take a simple blood test. If this is the case, then they should utilise the adjacent facilities at the Emergency Department of the hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and respond promptly to suspected meningitis; Unreliable emergency access to hospital care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of facility for simple blood testing in the GP out-of-hours setting

Wider context from the report

“1. On the first attendance at the OOH service, the attending staff having seen the infected umbilical cord, did not immediately send Mikey to the Hospital (as would have been the correct procedure according to the Consultant Lead Paediatrician who gave evidence to me.) 2. On the second attendance the doctor failed to appreciate the seriousness of the situation and at 10.45 at night sent the child home with a prescription for analgesia (which could not be filled until the following day in any event). The Consultant Paediatrician gave evidence to me “that there was a very high probability that he would have survived” had he been sent to the hospital at this time as he could and would have been administered an intra-venous anti-biotic. 3. If there is any realistic possibility of the condition being meningitis, the child should have been immediately admitted to the hospital. 4. The GP covering the surgery that night indicated that they do not have the facility to take a simple blood test. If this is the case, then they should utilise the adjacent facilities at the Emergency Department of the hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to escalate seriously ill children to hospital during OOH assessment

Wider context from the report

“1. On the first attendance at the OOH service, the attending staff having seen the infected umbilical cord, did not immediately send Mikey to the Hospital (as would have been the correct procedure according to the Consultant Lead Paediatrician who gave evidence to me.) 2. On the second attendance the doctor failed to appreciate the seriousness of the situation and at 10.45 at night sent the child home with a prescription for analgesia (which could not be filled until the following day in any event). The Consultant Paediatrician gave evidence to me “that there was a very high probability that he would have survived” had he been sent to the hospital at this time as he could and would have been administered an intra-venous anti-biotic. 3. If there is any realistic possibility of the condition being meningitis, the child should have been immediately admitted to the hospital. 4. The GP covering the surgery that night indicated that they do not have the facility to take a simple blood test. If this is the case, then they should utilise the adjacent facilities at the Emergency Department of the hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely emergency hospital conveyance; Unreliable emergency access to hospital care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide training on managing severely ill children for out-of-hours GPs alongside mandatory and statutory training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Annual appraisals take place with all staff. Learning from incidents in service allows GPs to review their training needs so that alongside maintaining their annual Mandatory and Statutory Training, particular development needs can be met. For GPs in the Out of Hours Service, their Bridgewater-specific training will often run alongside the continuing professional development they undertake as part of their practice. In ████████ case, he has undertaken training on management of the severely ill child to support his general practice role.”

Source location

2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct quarterly clinical audits of practitioners’ records and provide supervision and competency action plans where practice falls short.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Ongoing checks on the quality of the services we provide are made via quarterly clinical audit reviews, where a sample of clinical and medical records from each practitioner are reviewed by the clinical director enabling best practice to be recognised and shared with colleagues. Where best practice is not followed a period of supervision and formal support with competency improvement action plans is implemented.”

Source location

2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement NICE feverish-illness guidance in the out-of-hours service using PEWS and assessment templates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In 2013, the Trust implemented national NICE guidance dated May 2013 entitled “Feverish illness in children: Assessment and initial management in children younger than 5 years” which is based on validated algorithms. A copy of a link to the NICE guidance is enclosed, for your ease of reference: http://www.nice.org.uk/cg160/chapter/recommendations.”

Source location

2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The service does not routinely perform paediatric blood tests; referral directly to hospital paediatricians is considered sufficient, rather than using the Emergency Department.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In common with any GP practice, the GP Out of Hours service does not routinely take blood from children, including urgent circumstances, as we would not receive a report back in a timely enough manner to influence our decision making. If a practitioner felt that a blood test was likely to be important to the clinical decision making process, there is a clear referral protocol to the Paediatric department. A&E is not a referral route that we would use as there are pathways for an emergency referral to be made directly to the Paediatricians rather than patients waiting unnecessarily in A&E. At the time ████████, that a blood test was not deemed necessary, as evidenced through the NICE guidelines but if it had have been, an emergency referral to the Paediatricians would have been made.”

Source location

2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The clinical data produced a PEWS score of 0–2, which did not indicate that further action or hospital referral was required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is fully compliant with this guideline. The Trust uses the Paediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) system in the GP Out of Hours service as a way of ensuring that the steps recommended in the NICE guidance are considered (please see attachment one). Although the score sheet was not available during ████████ examination of Baby Mikey, running the score from the clinical data of the consultation showed the score is 0-2 which did not indicate further action was required.”

Source location

2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 December 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Share the Regulation 28 report with the Warrington Safeguarding Children Board’s local review.

    Stated by North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 December 2014.
  2. 2

    Communicate to out-of-hours practitioners that service stock paracetamol should be used instead of issuing late-night prescriptions.

    Stated by North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 December 2014.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the Regulation 28 report with the Warrington Safeguarding Children Board’s local review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You may be aware that the Warrington Safeguarding Children Board is undertaking a local review of the case and I will share a copy of your Regulation 28 report with the reviewers. If you would wish to be kept informed of the outcome of the review, please do let me know.”

Source location

2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate to out-of-hours practitioners that service stock paracetamol should be used instead of issuing late-night prescriptions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although it is unlikely to have affected the outcome in this tragic case, we have internally reflected that the Out of Hours drug cupboard stock of paracetamol should have been used rather than issuing a prescription at that time of night, particularly in the light of the age of the baby. This has been communicated to practitioners within the service, and we are sorry that it did not occur in this case.”

Source location

2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 16 December 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026