Thomas Joseph McAuley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Aug 2024•Dorset

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of safety notices or wider publicity highlighting the risk of using the space between LGV rear axles
  2. Risk of fatal injury from using the space between LGV rear axles
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe work in proximity to moving heavy vehicles and machinery

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Health and Safety Executive

    Continue raising awareness of welfare and construction-transport safety risks with industry through stakeholder engagement networks.

  2. Health and Safety Executive

    Publish freely accessible guidance on construction-site workplace transport safety, traffic management and pedestrian–vehicle segregation.

  3. Health and Safety Executive

    Provide and publish freely accessible guidance on construction-site welfare requirements and standards.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Health and Safety Executive

    Existing legislation and guidance are considered sufficient to control welfare and construction transport risks.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  2. Health and Safety Executive

    Duty holders retain responsibility for achieving legal compliance and sourcing advice suitable for their individual circumstances.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of safety notices or wider publicity highlighting the risk of using the space between LGV rear axles

Wider context from the report

“i. If the practice of using the space between the rear axles of an LGV is ongoing, there remains a risk of future deaths, as any small movement of the vehicle can cause fatal injuries. I am not aware of any safety notice(s) being issued since Mr McAuley’s death or any wider publicity that may have highlighted the risk. Ensuring that companies undertaking road resurfacing work or similar are made aware of the risk that this practice is ongoing will enable them to take measures to address this potential ongoing risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Risk of fatal injury from using the space between LGV rear axles

Wider context from the report

“i. If the practice of using the space between the rear axles of an LGV is ongoing, there remains a risk of future deaths, as any small movement of the vehicle can cause fatal injuries. I am not aware of any safety notice(s) being issued since Mr McAuley’s death or any wider publicity that may have highlighted the risk. Ensuring that companies undertaking road resurfacing work or similar are made aware of the risk that this practice is ongoing will enable them to take measures to address this potential ongoing risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe work in proximity to moving heavy vehicles and machinery.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue raising awareness of welfare and construction-transport safety risks with industry through stakeholder engagement networks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Through our stakeholder engagement networks, we will continue to raise awareness of matters arising in this case with industry to ensure they manage them appropriately. These topics will also be raised at inspections where appropriate.”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 3 · response
Published 9 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish freely accessible guidance on construction-site workplace transport safety, traffic management and pedestrian–vehicle segregation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HSE publishes guidance relating to workplace transport safety which is freely available on our website www.hse.gov.uk. The core message of this guidance being that duty holders must ensure that vehicle movements and traffic routes are organised such that pedestrians and vehicles are segregated so far as reasonably practicable. It is important to note that controls for transport safety cover segregation of pedestrians from vehicles whether moving or stationary, as unauthorised access to vehicles should be prevented and there are risks that stationary vehicles can move unexpectedly.”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 9 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide and publish freely accessible guidance on construction-site welfare requirements and standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HSE provides detailed guidance on construction site welfare requirements which is freely available. Examples of this guidance are:”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 1 · response
Published 9 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing legislation and guidance are considered sufficient to control welfare and construction transport risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having reviewed the circumstances of this fatal accident, it is HSE’s view that the need to provide adequate welfare facilities and control risks associated with transport safety are well known to industry and legislation and suitable and sufficient guidance already exists to assist duty holders in complying with their duties and adequately control the risks involved in this accident.”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 3 · response
Published 9 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Duty holders retain responsibility for achieving legal compliance and sourcing advice suitable for their individual circumstances.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The responsibility to achieve legal compliance, source suitable advice or information for their individual circumstance’s rests with the duty holder.”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 3 · response
Published 9 August 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026