PFD report

Thomas Joseph McAuley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Aug 2024•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of safety notices or wider publicity highlighting the risk of using the space between LGV rear axles
  2. Risk of fatal injury from using the space between LGV rear axles
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe work in proximity to moving heavy vehicles and machinery
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Continue raising awareness of welfare and construction-transport safety risks with industry through stakeholder engagement networks.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 9 August 2024.
  2. Action

    Publish freely accessible guidance on construction-site workplace transport safety, traffic management and pedestrian–vehicle segregation.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 August 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Existing legislation and guidance are considered sufficient to control welfare and construction transport risks.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of safety notices or wider publicity highlighting the risk of using the space between LGV rear axles

Wider context from the report

“i. If the practice of using the space between the rear axles of an LGV is ongoing, there remains a risk of future deaths, as any small movement of the vehicle can cause fatal injuries. I am not aware of any safety notice(s) being issued since Mr McAuley’s death or any wider publicity that may have highlighted the risk. Ensuring that companies undertaking road resurfacing work or similar are made aware of the risk that this practice is ongoing will enable them to take measures to address this potential ongoing risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Risk of fatal injury from using the space between LGV rear axles

Wider context from the report

“i. If the practice of using the space between the rear axles of an LGV is ongoing, there remains a risk of future deaths, as any small movement of the vehicle can cause fatal injuries. I am not aware of any safety notice(s) being issued since Mr McAuley’s death or any wider publicity that may have highlighted the risk. Ensuring that companies undertaking road resurfacing work or similar are made aware of the risk that this practice is ongoing will enable them to take measures to address this potential ongoing risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe work in proximity to moving heavy vehicles and machinery.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue raising awareness of welfare and construction-transport safety risks with industry through stakeholder engagement networks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Through our stakeholder engagement networks, we will continue to raise awareness of matters arising in this case with industry to ensure they manage them appropriately. These topics will also be raised at inspections where appropriate.”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 3 · response
Published 9 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish freely accessible guidance on construction-site workplace transport safety, traffic management and pedestrian–vehicle segregation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HSE publishes guidance relating to workplace transport safety which is freely available on our website www.hse.gov.uk. The core message of this guidance being that duty holders must ensure that vehicle movements and traffic routes are organised such that pedestrians and vehicles are segregated so far as reasonably practicable. It is important to note that controls for transport safety cover segregation of pedestrians from vehicles whether moving or stationary, as unauthorised access to vehicles should be prevented and there are risks that stationary vehicles can move unexpectedly.”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 9 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing legislation and guidance are considered sufficient to control welfare and construction transport risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having reviewed the circumstances of this fatal accident, it is HSE’s view that the need to provide adequate welfare facilities and control risks associated with transport safety are well known to industry and legislation and suitable and sufficient guidance already exists to assist duty holders in complying with their duties and adequately control the risks involved in this accident.”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 3 · response
Published 9 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Duty holders retain responsibility for achieving legal compliance and sourcing advice suitable for their individual circumstances.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The responsibility to achieve legal compliance, source suitable advice or information for their individual circumstance’s rests with the duty holder.”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 3 · response
Published 9 August 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Provide and publish freely accessible guidance on construction-site welfare requirements and standards.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 August 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide and publish freely accessible guidance on construction-site welfare requirements and standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HSE provides detailed guidance on construction site welfare requirements which is freely available. Examples of this guidance are:”

Source location

Response from HSE
Page 1 · response
Published 9 August 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026