Investigation and inquest
On 11/10/2017 I commenced an investigation into the death of Carl John Newman aged 23. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest held from the 2nd to the 6th March 2020.
The jury conclusion of the inquest was: Carl John Newman died by suicide
The medical cause of death was found as:
I a Compression of the neck
I b Hanging
I c ----------------
II ----------------
Circumstances of the death
The Jury found:
During admission to 68 Hornby Road, Liverpool on the 3rd October 2017 the Person Escort Form indicated that there was no immediate self-harm risks to Carl John Newman, also the Cell Sharing Risk Assessment concluded there were was more of a risk to others as opposed to himself. Further, a medical assessment filed by the Mental Health Nurse also drew the conclusion that there was no current risk to himself. The majority of witness statements indicate that Carl Newman was not distraught during his time in the Induction Unit. After 3rd October 2017, there was no known indicators of risk. However, the Day Two Assessment had not been completed in a timely manner, which may have flagged any potential risks.
Between the hours of 9.26am and 9.53am on the 6th October 2017, texts were received and statements indicate that calls were also exchanged between Carl and his former partner. On the 6th October 2017 between the hours of 9.30am and 11.30am, a ligature was fashioned around Carl Newman's neck in the toilet area of cell A5/11. It is believed Carl John Newman initiated this act with the intention of ending his life.
Coroner’s concerns
During the Course of evidence it became apparent that prison staff did not have ready access to training records in particular ACCT & SASH training – one officer engaged in prison reception processes had not had ACCT training for over three years – and surprisingly it was another three years before he underwent SASH training. As HMP Liverpool were present throughout this investigation, the court understands that these training issues are being resolved locally. However this is a national issue and It is important that not only should HMPPS hold training records for those employed in the prison service but that each individual should have a personal training record. It would help if training certificates with expiry dates were issued after all courses with a copy being given to attendees and the record being held by the prison service. This would ensure all officers with current training could work across the prison estate, adding resilience.
What does HMPPS intend to do to ensure that all officers and staff have current training in ACCT and other safer custody processes?