PFD report

Yaser Saleh · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Oct 2014•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure of computerised recall systems to identify chronic disease patients requiring review beyond current prescribing
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of case monitoring to identify cases requiring follow-upPart of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical safety-alert systems
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of computerised recall systems to identify chronic disease patients requiring review beyond current prescribing

Wider context from the report

“The GP reported that she believes that her EMIS computer system only called up people for review who were receiving regular prescriptions and thus a patient who had been on regular treatment but no longer was asking for inhalers was not identified as requiring call up for review. Whilst the court heard it was possible to customize the QOF system to call up patients, there was, according to the GP, no computerised system of calling up asthmatics who needed review unless they were currently on regular medication. She and the consultant in emergency medicine considered this created a risk of preventable deaths, that merited my making this report. The consultant in emergency medicine also said that this risk applied to other chronic diseases, such as epilepsy. This risk of not identifying those at risk of death because they no longer comply or have not been prescribed treatment taken in the past brought to the attention of EMIS and the Secretary of State, to consider whether EMIS has the potential or another electronic system should be commissioned to ensure that those with chronic disease requiring review and monitoring, are triggered for the attention of the GP, on wider criteria than current prescribing, or if such a system is available that the Department considers using it and other GPs are made aware of its use. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of case monitoring to identify cases requiring follow-up; Unreliable clinical safety-alert systems.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.