PFD report

Mrs Jane Jowers · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Sep 2020•East London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a statutory procedure for checking criminal convictions outside the UK
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably identify foreign convictionsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable criminal-conviction vetting for safety-sensitive roles
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Publish advice on obtaining overseas criminal-record checks and link to relevant Home Office guidance on the DBS website.

    Stated by Disclosure and Barring ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 November 2020.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Further statutory obligations concerning overseas criminal-record checks are matters for the Home Office and Parliament.

    Stated by Disclosure and Barring ServiceRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a statutory procedure for checking criminal convictions outside the UK

Wider context from the report

“The evidence at the Inquest revealed that there is no statutory procedure for checks to be undertaken for criminal convictions outside of the UK. The absence of statutory international checks may result in unsuitable persons with prior convictions working with vulnerable adults and children. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably identify foreign convictions; Unreliable criminal-conviction vetting for safety-sensitive roles.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish advice on obtaining overseas criminal-record checks and link to relevant Home Office guidance on the DBS website.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Advice in this regard and reference to the appropriate Home Office guidance is published on the DBS website and is attached as Appendix A. The Home Office published guidance provides information as to how to apply to a number of countries, including the Republic of Ireland, for an overseas criminal records check. Home Office guidance is attached as Appendix B.”

Source location

2020-0180-Response-from-DBS-Redacted.pdf
Page 5 · response
Published 19 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Further statutory obligations concerning overseas criminal-record checks are matters for the Home Office and Parliament.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In conclusion, under the existing statutory arrangements, there is provision to disclose criminality information from overseas on DBS certificates, but DBS has not considered the appropriateness or not of further statutory requirements and no further action is proposed. Consideration of further statutory obligations is a matter for the Home Office and Parliament. However, as I have explained above, there are considerable practicable limitations in gaining access to and sharing such information.”

Source location

2020-0180-Response-from-DBS-Redacted.pdf
Page 5 · response
Published 19 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reliable international data flows cannot be established because necessary agreements and cooperation with overseas law-enforcement agencies are unavailable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is no other international system available to DBS to identify overseas convictions. The DBS is not, therefore, aware of overseas criminality information unless it is passed from international law enforcement agencies to UK forces and recorded on their systems. DBS guidance for employers, therefore, sets out that DBS does not access overseas criminal records.”

Source location

2020-0180-Response-from-DBS-Redacted.pdf
Page 5 · response
Published 19 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing statutory arrangements allow overseas criminality information to be disclosed, while employers can obtain further overseas checks as part of recruitment risk assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The decision to carry out an overseas check is made by the employer and forms part of their risk assessment to be used in conjunction with their other pre-employment checks. DBS guidance states that the DBS check is only one component of an employer’s recruitment practices and the employer should decide on whether to obtain an overseas check on applicants who have lived or worked abroad, where there is not a statutory requirement to do so.”

Source location

2020-0180-Response-from-DBS-Redacted.pdf
Page 5 · response
Published 19 November 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026