PFD report

Robert Lee Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Oct 2022•Swansea and Neath Port Talbot

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. High risk of self-inflicted death during prisoners' early days in custody
  2. Failure to promptly capture and consider evidence relevant to deaths in custody
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable preservation and disclosure of material for death investigations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Review ligature-resistant cell build standards and use to support prisoners in crisis and maintain required safety features.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 October 2022.
  2. Action

    Draft and update the death-in-custody policy framework to identify relevant staff and prompt early recording of their information.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 October 2022.
  3. Action

    Replace the safer-cell unit material to reduce the risk of prisoners using the bars as ligature points.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 October 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Replacing the bars would not make the cells ligature-resistant or achieve the proposed risk-mitigation outcome.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

High risk of self-inflicted death during prisoners' early days in custody

Wider context from the report

“████████ I am aware that Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons 2018 inspection report in respect of HMP Swansea stated that. “there have been four self-inflicted deaths since the previous inspection, all within a week of arrival. This replicated findings at our previous inspection of Swansea” [S5]. The most current report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons dated 2020 states, “There had been two self-inflicted deaths since the last inspection, the most recent in December 2019. Both had occurred soon after the prisoners arrived at the prison” [1.23]. I have heard evidence that it is well known by prison staff and recognised in national Ministry of Justice policy and in HMP Swansea Prison Policy that the very early days are a particularly high-risk time for prisoners particularly those on remand or recalled on licence. This is supported by the findings of the above inspection report. ████████ I heard that there is a safer cell on the induction unit and in that cell the whole window unit has been replaced with plastic material that can be slid to allow prisoners to get air from the outside into the cell. I heard evidence that prisoners are not on the induction unit for a significant period but that prisoners in the induction unit are in a vulnerable time in custody as they have just arrived in prison. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to promptly capture and consider evidence relevant to deaths in custody

Wider context from the report

“I heard evidence from the two prison officers who appear in the HMP Swansea CCTV as mentioned above. On the evidence I have seen these witnesses were the last members of prison staff Lee spoke to before his death. At all stages into the investigation into Lee’s death (prisons and probations ombudsman and coronial) these witnesses have stated that they are unable to assist with what Lee was saying to them before his death. I am concerned that immediately following Lee’s death and the following day that these highly material witnesses (who were on duty) were not spoken to, did not attend a hot or cold debrief and were not asked to make a first account of events when matters were fresh in their minds. These witnesses did become known to the PPO. As a result, my investigation into Lee’s death has been significantly hampered. I am therefore concerned that lessons may not have been fully learnt from the circumstances of Lee’s death. I am concerned that if evidence relevant to a death in custody is not immediately captured and considered a situation may be created where evidence is lost which prevents general lessons from being learnt from a death in custody and that this creates a risk that other deaths will occur. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations; Unreliable preservation and disclosure of material for death investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review ligature-resistant cell build standards and use to support prisoners in crisis and maintain required safety features.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At a national level, HMPPS is undertaking a review of ligature-resistant cells, which have been designed to eliminate ligature points as far as possible, including from the ████████. The review will include their build standards and how they are used to support prisoners in crisis. Our aim is to ensure that cells that are fitted with ligature-resistant features are available as an option for staff managing prisoners in crisis, and that they retain those features in full working order and do not deviate from the standard over time. At this point it is too early to say what new rules may be introduced, such as strengthening the frequency of maintenance, although we do recognise that cells are subject to constant wear and tear and need frequent attention to keep them up to standard.”

Source location

Response from HM Prision and Probabtion Services
Page 2 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Draft and update the death-in-custody policy framework to identify relevant staff and prompt early recording of their information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I recognise the importance of ensuring that any evidence relating to deaths in custody is preserved, including the recollections of staff who have had recent interactions with the deceased individual. Prisons are required to have contingency plans in place that include debriefs with staff who were on the scene at the time of the incident, but these will not be the only staff to have had potentially relevant contact with the prisoner. We are currently drafting a new HMPPS Policy Framework, updating the policy for prisons to follow in the event of a death in custody, and within this will include guidance for prisons to ensure that staff who have relevant information are identified and prompted to make a record of this at an early stage.”

Source location

Response from HM Prision and Probabtion Services
Page 2 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replace the safer-cell unit material to reduce the risk of prisoners using the bars as ligature points.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you have described, the ████████ unit within the safer cell on the induction unit has been replaced with plastic material that can be slid to allow prisoners to gain air from the outside into the cell. This function reduces the risk of an individual utilising the ████████ bars as a ligature point and, in certain cases, those who are assessed as presenting with higher or imminent risk of suicide will be located there. Whilst replacing the ████████ in the normal cells on the induction unit at HMP Swansea with those described will mitigate the risk of individuals using ████████ as ligature points, it would not make these cells ligature-resistant. Therefore, the suggested action will be made at a prohibitive cost as we do not consider that the change will achieve its intended outcome of mitigating risk.”

Source location

Response from HM Prision and Probabtion Services
Page 1 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replacing the bars would not make the cells ligature-resistant or achieve the proposed risk-mitigation outcome.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you have described, the ████████ unit within the safer cell on the induction unit has been replaced with plastic material that can be slid to allow prisoners to gain air from the outside into the cell. This function reduces the risk of an individual utilising the ████████ bars as a ligature point and, in certain cases, those who are assessed as presenting with higher or imminent risk of suicide will be located there. Whilst replacing the ████████ in the normal cells on the induction unit at HMP Swansea with those described will mitigate the risk of individuals using ████████ as ligature points, it would not make these cells ligature-resistant. Therefore, the suggested action will be made at a prohibitive cost as we do not consider that the change will achieve its intended outcome of mitigating risk.”

Source location

Response from HM Prision and Probabtion Services
Page 1 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The proposed replacement will not be undertaken because its cost is considered prohibitive.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you have described, the ████████ unit within the safer cell on the induction unit has been replaced with plastic material that can be slid to allow prisoners to gain air from the outside into the cell. This function reduces the risk of an individual utilising the ████████ bars as a ligature point and, in certain cases, those who are assessed as presenting with higher or imminent risk of suicide will be located there. Whilst replacing the ████████ in the normal cells on the induction unit at HMP Swansea with those described will mitigate the risk of individuals using ████████ as ligature points, it would not make these cells ligature-resistant. Therefore, the suggested action will be made at a prohibitive cost as we do not consider that the change will achieve its intended outcome of mitigating risk.”

Source location

Response from HM Prision and Probabtion Services
Page 1 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026