PFD report

Quinn Lias Parker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Oct 2021•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to make careful, considered placenta-interference or disposal decisions with early coroner discussion
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable retention of biological samples for postmortem investigation
  2. Failure to retain the placenta for full paediatric post mortem examination before coronial reporting
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to preserve clinical evidence and data after serious clinical eventsPart of recurring concern: Failure to retain safety-critical source records and evidencePart of recurring concern: Unreliable coronial autopsy governance and processesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable preservation and disclosure of material for death investigationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable retention of biological samples for postmortem investigation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Discuss placenta examination with the Coroner’s office when a neonatal death occurs within the 96-hour Pathology stop period.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStatus unclearThe respondent did not make the status of this action clear when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  2. Action

    Maintain a 96-hour stop on dissecting placentas sent to Pathology, allowing fixation during the period without dissection.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  3. Action

    Review whether placental examination processes need adaptation after receiving further information about the examination.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 October 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The Trust considers a process to identify very unwell neonates for pre-death Coroner discussions impractical and unreliable because deaths are not predictable.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make careful, considered placenta-interference or disposal decisions with early coroner discussion

Wider context from the report

“1. The placenta, a key organ required for a full paediatric post mortem in an early neonatal death, has been interfered with such that the Paediatric Pathologist, is limited in his conclusion as to the likely cause of death. In some ways the placenta is akin to an organ for the purposes of a paediatric post mortem- Loss of an organ at any post mortem examination, may well undermine the ability of the pathologist to carry out a full and proper examination. Decisions surrounding interference with, or disposal of, the placenta should be made in a careful and considered manner, with thought given to an early discussion with the coroner as would happen if organ donation is being considered. This did not happen in this case. 2. Unfortunately, there have been a number of cases in Nottingham where the death of a baby shortly after the birth was anticipated, but the placenta was disposed of and/or interfered with prior to the death being reported to the coroner. This undermines the coronial investigation resulting in limited findings and therefore limited conclusions at inquest. This will likely lead to a lack of learning from such deaths, and therefore a risk that similar deaths will occur in the future. It may also deprive the parents of significant information when considering whether future pregnancies may be at greater risk with the consequent need for appropriate management and planning. 3. The Nottinghamshire Coronial service has to date worked collaboratively with all local Trusts, but particularly with NUH NHS Trust, to ensure key staff understand the importance of retaining the placenta in an early neonatal death. This has not led to the actions necessary to achieve a full and proper examination of the placenta in repeated paediatric post mortems in this jurisdiction. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable retention of biological samples for postmortem investigation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to retain the placenta for full paediatric post mortem examination before coronial reporting

Wider context from the report

“1. The placenta, a key organ required for a full paediatric post mortem in an early neonatal death, has been interfered with such that the Paediatric Pathologist, is limited in his conclusion as to the likely cause of death. In some ways the placenta is akin to an organ for the purposes of a paediatric post mortem- Loss of an organ at any post mortem examination, may well undermine the ability of the pathologist to carry out a full and proper examination. Decisions surrounding interference with, or disposal of, the placenta should be made in a careful and considered manner, with thought given to an early discussion with the coroner as would happen if organ donation is being considered. This did not happen in this case. 2. Unfortunately, there have been a number of cases in Nottingham where the death of a baby shortly after the birth was anticipated, but the placenta was disposed of and/or interfered with prior to the death being reported to the coroner. This undermines the coronial investigation resulting in limited findings and therefore limited conclusions at inquest. This will likely lead to a lack of learning from such deaths, and therefore a risk that similar deaths will occur in the future. It may also deprive the parents of significant information when considering whether future pregnancies may be at greater risk with the consequent need for appropriate management and planning. 3. The Nottinghamshire Coronial service has to date worked collaboratively with all local Trusts, but particularly with NUH NHS Trust, to ensure key staff understand the importance of retaining the placenta in an early neonatal death. This has not led to the actions necessary to achieve a full and proper examination of the placenta in repeated paediatric post mortems in this jurisdiction. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to preserve clinical evidence and data after serious clinical events; Failure to retain safety-critical source records and evidence; Unreliable coronial autopsy governance and processes; Unreliable preservation and disclosure of material for death investigations; Unreliable retention of biological samples for postmortem investigation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss placenta examination with the Coroner’s office when a neonatal death occurs within the 96-hour Pathology stop period.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This along with the longer ‘stop’ period of 4 days will, we hope, ensure that for the majority of relevant deaths in the neo-natal period there will be an opportunity for your office to have further communication with Pathology regarding the examination of the placenta.”

Source location

Response from NUH (3)
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain a 96-hour stop on dissecting placentas sent to Pathology, allowing fixation during the period without dissection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Last year, in the light of your PFD report, an immediate 48 hour stop was put on the dissection of all placentas. However we have since reviewed the proposed processes and the length of that stop has been extended and is now set at 96 hours (ie 4 days) for all placentas that are sent to Pathology. A placenta may be fixed during that period, to prevent its deterioration, but it will not be dissected.”

Source location

Response from NUH (3)
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review whether placental examination processes need adaptation after receiving further information about the examination.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to this Report the Trust will develop a standard procedure such that in the case of any neonatal death within 48 hours of birth the medical examiner team will inform the pathology laboratory of this at the very earliest opportunity. Once further information is gained in relation to the placental examination the Pathology Department will review whether there needs to be any adaptation to current examination processes.”

Source location

Response from NUH
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust considers a process to identify very unwell neonates for pre-death Coroner discussions impractical and unreliable because deaths are not predictable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“After consultation with Obstetricians, Neonatologists, Pathologists and Digital Lead, it is the view of the Trust that it is not proportionate nor practically achievable to devise a process that would reliably allow for this given that all of the 975 admissions to NICU each year are, by the very nature of NICU, neonates who are very unwell and may go on to die. The death of a neonate on NICU is not predictable in a way that could reliably allow us to identify the 25 or so neonates who do actually die each year. This is why we have determined that extending the Pathology stop period across the board for all placentas, and having discussions with your office where a death occurs within 96 hours, is a preferable and more realistically achievable approach.”

Source location

Response from NUH (3)
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Develop and roll out automatic NerveCentre push notifications to Pathology when a baby dies, including testing, staff training and a go-live date.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  2. 2

    Remind clinical teams to highlight suspected placental pathology on pathology request forms.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  3. 3

    Use a new proforma for BMS staff to document whether membrane vessels are intact or ruptured during placenta preparation.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  4. 4

    Remind all midwives to examine placentas according to the guideline before sending them to pathology, without delegating the task.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  5. 5

    Develop a procedure requiring the medical examiner team to promptly notify pathology of any neonatal death within 48 hours of birth.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 October 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and roll out automatic NerveCentre push notifications to Pathology when a baby dies, including testing, staff training and a go-live date.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Currently, the Medical Examiner informs Pathology of any baby deaths within the first 48 hours. However, the Neonatal Team have also been in discussion with our Head of Patient Safety, the Medical Examiner and Digital Lead to create a digital solution. We propose to use the Trust’s NerveCentre system to notify Pathology of a baby’s death. This will be done through an automatic ‘push’ notification to the Pathology Team to allow them to see that a baby has died. We are in the process of testing the system prior to rolling out training and setting a go live date. The advantage of a ‘push’ notification is that it does not require any additional human intervention to inform Pathology of a death.”

Source location

Response from NUH (3)
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind clinical teams to highlight suspected placental pathology on pathology request forms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. If the clinical team feel at the time there is placental pathology they should highlight this on their request form The clinical team who would request placental pathology have been reminded to highlight this on the request form. There may, however, be times when that request is not immediately apparent at the time of birth and as in the case of Quinn Parker, this may be requested at a later date.”

Source location

Response from NUH (2)
Page 1 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use a new proforma for BMS staff to document whether membrane vessels are intact or ruptured during placenta preparation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. If the BMS noted a vessel in the membrane as in this case, it should be documented as to whether it was intact or ruptured I have attached a new proforma that has been introduced since this case for the BMS to complete at the time of the placenta preparation to ensure that information such as this is captured.”

Source location

Response from NUH (2)
Page 1 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind all midwives to examine placentas according to the guideline before sending them to pathology, without delegating the task.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The midwife sending the placenta should examine it and not take the word of another midwife The Director of Midwifery has agreed to remind all midwives about their responsibility to examine placentas according to the guideline prior to sending to pathology and not delegate this task to others.”

Source location

Response from NUH (2)
Page 1 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a procedure requiring the medical examiner team to promptly notify pathology of any neonatal death within 48 hours of birth.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to this Report the Trust will develop a standard procedure such that in the case of any neonatal death within 48 hours of birth the medical examiner team will inform the pathology laboratory of this at the very earliest opportunity. Once further information is gained in relation to the placental examination the Pathology Department will review whether there needs to be any adaptation to current examination processes.”

Source location

Response from NUH
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026