PFD report

Silvia Eileen Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Jul 2014•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Delays in acting on unsuccessful attempts to establish contact
  2. Failure to convey difficulties in establishing telephone contact to the family
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Review, update and ratify the no-reply telephone-call policy for out-of-hours patient contacts requiring telephone assessment or face-to-face appointments.

    Stated by Care UKStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 July 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in acting on unsuccessful attempts to establish contact

Wider context from the report

“• Although initial reports from Mrs Taylor gave no concern for the need for urgent medical attention, unsuccessful attempts to contact her were not acted upon for several hours. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to convey difficulties in establishing telephone contact to the family

Wider context from the report

“• The difficulties in establishing telephone contact with Mrs Taylor, were not conveyed to the family. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review, update and ratify the no-reply telephone-call policy for out-of-hours patient contacts requiring telephone assessment or face-to-face appointments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following receipt of the report we have reviewed and updated the policy as to how our current services should proceed if we make a telephone call to a patient and there is no reply (policy attached for reference).”

Source location

2014-0327-Response-by-Care-UK
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026