PFD report

Linda Heath · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Mar 2024•East Riding and Hull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
6

Named on the report

Responses found
6

Of 6 recipients

Stated actions
22

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Insufficient inquiry into the parameters of care provided by private domiciliary carers
  2. Failure of immediate discharge summaries to include relevant and sufficient community treatment and nursing information
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  3. Absence of GP follow-up triggers for recently discharged patients with worsening conditions and missed routine appointments
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of case monitoring to identify cases requiring follow-upPart of recurring concern: Failure to maintain follow-up of patients who disengage from carePart of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after dischargePart of recurring concern: Unreliable arrangement and communication of patient appointments and follow-up
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.11

  1. Action

    Discuss the appropriate level of information about community-nursing referrals for inclusion in medical discharge summaries.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  2. Action

    Remind staff to reassess and refer home-care packages for revision when patients’ hospital admission indicates changed care needs.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  3. Action

    Finalize and roll out an electronic nursing discharge pro forma prompting community-nursing referral consideration and recording referral recipients.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 May 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Position

    Concerns about points 2 and 3 relate to primary care rather than the Trust’s responsive responsibilities.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient inquiry into the parameters of care provided by private domiciliary carers

Wider context from the report

“(4) An over reliance upon private hygiene care packages with insufficient inquiry into the parameters of care provided by the private domiciliary carers. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of immediate discharge summaries to include relevant and sufficient community treatment and nursing information

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Immediate Discharge Summary did not include relevant or sufficient information about treatment in the community needs or a nursing summary. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of GP follow-up triggers for recently discharged patients with worsening conditions and missed routine appointments

Wider context from the report

“(3) No trigger appears to exist whereby GPs conduct follow up enquiries or visits to patients who have recently been discharged from hospital and who are complaining of a condition which may worsen and failing to attend routine appointments due to a worsening of their condition. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of case monitoring to identify cases requiring follow-up; Failure to maintain follow-up of patients who disengage from care; Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge; Unreliable arrangement and communication of patient appointments and follow-up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make post-discharge referrals for patients needing district nursing care

Wider context from the report

“(2) Despite the presence of a difficult sacral sore which would have benefitted from district nursing care, no referral was made post discharge by the GP surgery. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge; Unreliable referrals to district nursing services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the appropriate level of information about community-nursing referrals for inclusion in medical discharge summaries.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to the immediate discharge summary this is a document completed by medical staff, and is intended to be a summary of the medical care. There are ongoing discussions about the level of information that should be included within the form, as it is important it does not become too lengthy, but the Trust is of the view that in order to prevent the problem that occurred in Linda’s case, the issue to be addressed is ensuring that appropriate referrals are made in the first place, by the Trust at the point of discharge. In Linda’s case if the discharge summary had noted the need for community nursing referral it is true that it is possible the GP could have followed this up, but in fairness it would not be the GP’s responsibility to do that. In Linda’s case she proactively sought input from her GP and their involvement was discussed at the Inquest.”

Source location

Response from HUTH
Page 2 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind staff to reassess and refer home-care packages for revision when patients’ hospital admission indicates changed care needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The other issue of concern relevant to the Trust’s involvement (point 4) related to an over-reliance upon private hygiene care packages with insufficient enquiry into the parameters of care provided by the private domiciliary carers. At the point of discharge, patients who are in receipt of care packages at home need”

Source location

Response from HUTH
Page 2 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Finalize and roll out an electronic nursing discharge pro forma prompting community-nursing referral consideration and recording referral recipients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust confirms that it has developed a pro forma to be utilised by nursing staff in relation to each and every discharge of an in-patient. This pro forma will be used when nurses are planning for a patient’s discharge, and it will identify and highlight a number of matters that need to be considered and addressed at the point of discharge. The pro forma is still being finalised, this work is expected to conclude within the next two weeks – because it is an electronic system, the Trust’s digital team has been involved in updating it. That said a number of words are already using the document in paper form but this will be rolled out across the Trust very shortly.”

Source location

Response from HUTH
Page 2 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Advance national programmes to improve access to and sharing of patient information between NHS and private providers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Nationally, there are several programmes of work underway to improve access to and the sharing of patient information between providers, both NHS and private. These include the National Care Records Service and Shared Care Records.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore enabling external SystmOne users to send referrals directly into CHCP’s SystmOne system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Internally CHCP services can send SystmOne to SystmOne referrals, (SystmOne is CHCP main Electronic Care Record (ECR) system). CHCP is currently exploring options to enable external SystmOne users to also send SystmOne to SystmOne referrals.”

Source location

Response from City Healthcare Partnership Hull
Page 2 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share referral criteria, available services and referral instructions regularly with GPs and other healthcare organisations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• CHCP regularly shares updates in relation to the referral criteria, services offered and how to refer with GPs and other HCP organisations including Secondary Care, and GPs and HCP organisations also have access to the Directory of Services (DoS) via www.directoryofservices.nhs.uk & NHS Service Finder via www.servicefinder.nhs.uk”

Source location

Response from City Healthcare Partnership Hull
Page 2 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Participate in HUTH’s time-limited task group to explore digital discharge-planning solutions for patients with complex wounds or pressure ulcers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The preferable solution to transferring care between CHCP and HUTH would be a digital solution between the two ECRs. CHCP TVNs are currently attending a time limited Task and Finish Group established by HUTH in relation to exploring discharge planning for patients with complex wounds/pressure ulcers and seek a digital solution. This Task and Finish Group is in addition to the Triangulation meetings.”

Source location

Response from City Healthcare Partnership Hull
Page 3 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the review findings with CQC’s Primary and Community Care operations team for consideration in its regulatory response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A national professional advisor and senior specialist for Primary and Community Care at CQC have reviewed the coroner’s letter, evidence bundle, the clinical records and practice response to the integrated care board who would cover the oversight of this GP practice. The findings will be shared with the operations team for Primary and Community Care to consider alongside other information held by CQC. This will inform our regulatory response.”

Source location

Response from CQC
Page 3 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruit a Data Quality and IT Officer to oversee data-quality audits and provide training where applicable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Training: Additional training and updates have been provided to all staff regarding the importance of good record-keeping. This includes understanding the significance of accurate and detailed documentation in the patient record. We have recently recruited a Data Quality and IT Officer to oversee and ensure that data is of a high standard through audits and training where applicable.”

Source location

Response from GP Surgery
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement mandatory use of SystmOne task functionality for structured communication, monitored task handling, and patient-record traceability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To address concerns regarding the lack of referrals to the district nursing team and other issues raised, the following measures have been discussed with the practice team and implemented to prevent future occurrences:”

Source location

Response from GP Surgery
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide staff training and updates on accurate, detailed patient-record documentation and good record-keeping.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Training: Additional training and updates have been provided to all staff regarding the importance of good record-keeping. This includes understanding the significance of accurate and detailed documentation in the patient record. We have recently recruited a Data Quality and IT Officer to oversee and ensure that data is of a high standard through audits and training where applicable.”

Source location

Response from GP Surgery
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Concerns about points 2 and 3 relate to primary care rather than the Trust’s responsive responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Matters of concern at paragraph 5 of the Report are noted, and the Trust responds as it did at the Inquest in relation to points 1 and 4. Points 2 and 3 relate to primary care.”

Source location

Response from HUTH
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The material risk arose from missed community nursing referrals at discharge, not insufficient information in the immediate discharge summary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Matters of concern at paragraph 5 of the Report are noted, and the Trust responds as it did at the Inquest in relation to points 1 and 4. Points 2 and 3 relate to primary care.”

Source location

Response from HUTH
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Providers involved in Linda’s care should address the specific care concerns, provide further information, and identify related learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your Report raises some concerns that would be more appropriately answered by the providers involved in Linda’s care, who I note you have also addressed your Report to. My response to your focuses on those areas that fall within the remit of NHS England’s national policy and programmes, although my regional colleagues have engaged with the Humber and North Yorkshire Health and Care Partnership on the concerns raised, as this is system in which the providers involved in Linda’s care operate.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Feedback on the concerns cannot be provided because no referral was made to Community Nursing, and the referral hub manages all CHCP referrals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“City Health Care Partnership (CHCP) is unable to provide any feedback in relation to the above concerns, as there was no referral made to CHCP Community Nursing by Hull University Teaching Hospital (HUTH) or St Andrew’s Surgery Hull. CHCP has a 24-hour Care Co-ordination Hub, which manages all referrals into CHCP.”

Source location

Response from City Healthcare Partnership Hull
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Routine monitoring and risk-based inspections are considered sufficient to identify and address further concerns about the services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the inspection process we routinely review correspondence, tasks and referrals. We will use the regulation 28 report to remind colleagues of the importance of this process.”

Source location

Response from CQC
Page 3 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Oversight of the GP practice is assigned to the integrated care board, while findings inform CQC’s regulatory response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A national professional advisor and senior specialist for Primary and Community Care at CQC have reviewed the coroner’s letter, evidence bundle, the clinical records and practice response to the integrated care board who would cover the oversight of this GP practice. The findings will be shared with the operations team for Primary and Community Care to consider alongside other information held by CQC. This will inform our regulatory response.”

Source location

Response from CQC
Page 3 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.11

  1. 1

    Establish equivalent triangulation processes for community providers in North and Northeast Lincolnshire.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  2. 2

    Operate triangulation meetings improving liaison and communication between acute-hospital and community district-nursing teams for complex tuberculosis nursing cases.

    Stated by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  3. 3

    Discuss Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share resulting learning across national and regional NHS services.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  4. 4

    Make improvements to ensure Prevention of Future Deaths reports are shared across the organisation more swiftly and prevent future response delays.

    Stated by Nursing and Midwifery CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  5. 5

    Investigate why Prevention of Future Deaths reports were delayed or not shared with the correct team.

    Stated by Nursing and Midwifery CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  6. 6

    Maintain bi-monthly CHCP-HUTH tissue-viability meetings supported by shared wound-care proformas and direct contact for interim admissions or discharges.

    Stated by City Health Care Partnership CICStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  7. 7

    Inspect the Hull and East Riding community nursing service’s wound-care management.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  8. 8

    Remind CQC colleagues of the importance of reviewing correspondence, tasks and referrals during inspection processes.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  9. 9

    Discuss the concerns about Mrs Heath’s death at the next engagement meeting with Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  10. 10

    Use incidents reported to the Learn from Patient Safety Events system within CQC’s intelligence monitoring.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  11. 11

    Continue working with other organisations, including the local trust, to identify improvements to patient-care pathways.

    Stated by St Andrews SurgeryStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 May 2024.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The community nursing service requires no enforcement action because its focused wound-care inspection found no such requirement and its good rating remains.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish equivalent triangulation processes for community providers in North and Northeast Lincolnshire.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is also worth noting that the Trust has seen the response prepared by CHCP in relation to the Regulation 28 report and, in particular, note their comments regarding the triangulation meetings taking place in relation to complex Tuberculosis Nursing (TVN) cases. The Trust confirms that the system is working well in terms of improving liaison and communication between Acute Hospital TVN teams and the CHCP Community District Nursing Team in Hull that provide community nursing services. Plans and discussions are under way to establish similar processes for community providers in other parts of the Trust’s geographical area including North & Northeast Lincolnshire.”

Source location

Response from HUTH
Page 3 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate triangulation meetings improving liaison and communication between acute-hospital and community district-nursing teams for complex tuberculosis nursing cases.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is also worth noting that the Trust has seen the response prepared by CHCP in relation to the Regulation 28 report and, in particular, note their comments regarding the triangulation meetings taking place in relation to complex Tuberculosis Nursing (TVN) cases. The Trust confirms that the system is working well in terms of improving liaison and communication between Acute Hospital TVN teams and the CHCP Community District Nursing Team in Hull that provide community nursing services. Plans and discussions are under way to establish similar processes for community providers in other parts of the Trust’s geographical area including North & Northeast Lincolnshire.”

Source location

Response from HUTH
Page 3 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share resulting learning across national and regional NHS services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Linda, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make improvements to ensure Prevention of Future Deaths reports are shared across the organisation more swiftly and prevent future response delays.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, I would like to apologise for the delay in acknowledging and responding to your report. We are taking steps to identify why the report did not reach the correct team in time for us to respond in accordance with the statutory deadline and will make appropriate improvements to prevent this from happening in future.”

Source location

Response from Nursing and Midwifery Council
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Investigate why Prevention of Future Deaths reports were delayed or not shared with the correct team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, I would like to apologise for the delay in acknowledging and responding to your report. We are taking steps to identify why the report did not reach the correct team in time for us to respond in accordance with the statutory deadline and will make appropriate improvements to prevent this from happening in future.”

Source location

Response from Nursing and Midwifery Council
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain bi-monthly CHCP-HUTH tissue-viability meetings supported by shared wound-care proformas and direct contact for interim admissions or discharges.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Bi-monthly Triangulation meetings between CHCP and HUTH Tissue Viability Nurses (TVN) are in place to discuss/hand over care for pressure ulcer and complex wound care patients. CHCP and HUTH Electronic Care Record (ECR) systems cannot communicate with each other, therefore with the help of CHCP SystmOne team CHCP TVN has been able to create a proforma that sits within SystmOne which is completed by CHCP TVN and sent electronically via email to HUTH TVN prior to the Triangulation meetings for discussion.”

Source location

Response from City Healthcare Partnership Hull
Page 2 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inspect the Hull and East Riding community nursing service’s wound-care management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In June 2022 we carried out a focussed inspection based upon the quality of management of wound care within the Hull and East Riding community nursing service. The inspection did not look at other services provided by City Health Care Partnership or other areas of the community nursing service. This inspection was not rated, which meant the existing rating of good remains in place. CQC did not identify any required enforcement action during this inspection.”

Source location

Response from CQC
Page 3 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind CQC colleagues of the importance of reviewing correspondence, tasks and referrals during inspection processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the inspection process we routinely review correspondence, tasks and referrals. We will use the regulation 28 report to remind colleagues of the importance of this process.”

Source location

Response from CQC
Page 3 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the concerns about Mrs Heath’s death at the next engagement meeting with Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“CQC will discuss the concerns you have raised about Mrs Heath’s death at our next engagement meeting with the Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. If we are not assured that improvements have been made, we will make an appropriate regulatory response.”

Source location

Response from CQC
Page 4 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use incidents reported to the Learn from Patient Safety Events system within CQC’s intelligence monitoring.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to our inspection activity, CQC continually monitors all the information we hold about services for any themes and trends. We review intelligence data from a range of sources. For example, for trust’s we look at incidents reported to National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) and Strategic Executive Information Systems (StEIS). This will now include incidents reported to the “Learn from Patient Safety Events” system (LFPSEIR). We also receive information from local authority safeguarding teams and attend meetings safeguarding meetings. We also engage with other regulators (such as the Environmental Health Agency or local Clinical Commissioning Groups) and Fire and Rescue Services or the Police.”

Source location

Response from CQC
Page 4 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with other organisations, including the local trust, to identify improvements to patient-care pathways.

Verbatim wording from the response

“These measures will enhance communication within the practice and the wider team within primary and secondary care. We will also continue to work with other organisations, including the local trust, to find ways to improve patient care pathways.”

Source location

Response from GP Surgery
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The community nursing service requires no enforcement action because its focused wound-care inspection found no such requirement and its good rating remains.

Verbatim wording from the response

“CQC inspected Community health services for adults in November 2016 and rated it as good.”

Source location

Response from CQC
Page 3 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
6/6

Data last updated 7 September 2026