PFD report

John Peter RICHARDSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Mar 2019•West Sussex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a specific leave policy for voluntary patients
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable mental-health patient leave arrangementsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Include guidance on voluntary patients leaving wards in the new Acute Care Operational Policy.

    Stated by Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 June 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    No further standalone policy is considered necessary because the principles are incorporated into the new Acute Care Operational Policy.

    Stated by Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation TrustNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a specific leave policy for voluntary patients

Wider context from the report

“(2) However the death of Mr Richardson appears to have occurred when there was some confusion amongst staff with regards to Mr Richardson’s leave status. This was identified by the Jury in their conclusion. Whilst some guidance is provided to staff, with regards to voluntary patients taking leave, there is no specific Leave Policy for Voluntary Patients in the same way as there is one for those patients sectioned under the Mental Health Act. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable mental-health patient leave arrangements; Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include guidance on voluntary patients leaving wards in the new Acute Care Operational Policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following receipt of your letter, we have given considerable further thought as to how best we might improve our staff’s understanding of the principles to be followed when voluntary patients leave the wards. The decision we have taken is to include guidance in our new Acute Care Operational Policy. I have enclosed a copy of that guidance for your information. As you will see, it covers both s.17 leave as well as the principles that need to be applied to voluntary patients. Presenting the guidance in this way was considered to be preferable to any further stand-alone policy. It is hoped that this will be highly accessible and provide immediate access to the key principles, coupled with signposting to other documents if more information is required.”

Source location

2019-0084-Response-by-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 9 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No further standalone policy is considered necessary because the principles are incorporated into the new Acute Care Operational Policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following receipt of your letter, we have given considerable further thought as to how best we might improve our staff’s understanding of the principles to be followed when voluntary patients leave the wards. The decision we have taken is to include guidance in our new Acute Care Operational Policy. I have enclosed a copy of that guidance for your information. As you will see, it covers both s.17 leave as well as the principles that need to be applied to voluntary patients. Presenting the guidance in this way was considered to be preferable to any further stand-alone policy. It is hoped that this will be highly accessible and provide immediate access to the key principles, coupled with signposting to other documents if more information is required.”

Source location

2019-0084-Response-by-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 9 June 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026