James Robertson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 15 Feb 2016•Portsmouth and South East Hampshire

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to accurately record the timing of resident checks
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care recordsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable recording of required observations in care and custody
  2. Lack of national standards for the contents of nursing home emergency resuscitation packs
  3. Failure to make residents' DNACPR status promptly accessible to responding staff
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable DNACPR decision-making, recording and communication
No response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is included in the published responses for this report.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to accurately record the timing of resident checks

Wider context from the report

“1) At Mr Robertson's Inquest, his care notes were referred to and I was told that carers were not required to accurately report the time of carrying out checks on him. This meant the Inquest could not accurately ascertain when he had been checked by care staff on the day of his death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records; Unreliable recording of required observations in care and custody.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national standards for the contents of nursing home emergency resuscitation packs

Wider context from the report

“3) I was also told that there are no national standards for what should be included in emergency resuscitation packs kept at nursing homes and in consequence, the pack brought to assist Mr Robertson was lacking useful equipment, particularly a suction unit. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make residents' DNACPR status promptly accessible to responding staff

Wider context from the report

“2) I was also told that whether a resident at Cams Ridge was covered by DNACPR was indicated by a coloured sticker on the door of the resident's room and in centrally-located notes. The sticker on the door was not appreciated by a nurse who attended to him when he was found unresponsive and who then went to look in his notes, delaying resuscitation efforts. I was told that it would be better if DNACPR status was included on a resident's shift hand over notes which would be more quickly accessible than the centrally-located notes. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable DNACPR decision-making, recording and communication.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of useful equipment in nursing home emergency resuscitation packs

Wider context from the report

“3) I was also told that there are no national standards for what should be included in emergency resuscitation packs kept at nursing homes and in consequence, the pack brought to assist Mr Robertson was lacking useful equipment, particularly a suction unit. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable; Unreliable emergency response arrangements in care homes; Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.