PFD report

Donald John TILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Jan 2018•Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to apply cricoid pressure when clinically indicated
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable airway protection during anaesthesia
  2. Lack of a bronchoscope on the standard anaesthetic equipment trolley
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable
  3. Unavailability of a functional bronchoscope suction button
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Review disposable bronchoscopy equipment and assess its efficacy for possible wider use in theatres.

    Stated by University Hospital of North Midlands NHS Trust (UHNMStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 March 2018.
  2. Action

    Ensure beds and trolleys have rapid-tilt facilities and keep a rapid-tilt trolley available for high-risk patients.

    Stated by University Hospital of North Midlands NHS Trust (UHNMStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 March 2018.
  3. Action

    Establish a fully electronic case-notes system to improve access to medical records.

    Stated by University Hospital of North Midlands NHS Trust (UHNMStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 March 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Position

    Bronchoscopes are not generally standard difficult-airway-trolley equipment, and initial aspiration treatment can often use blind endotracheal suction.

    Stated by University Hospital of North Midlands NHS Trust (UHNMDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to apply cricoid pressure when clinically indicated

Wider context from the report

“4. Cricoid pressure and NG tubes were not used in this case. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable airway protection during anaesthesia.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a bronchoscope on the standard anaesthetic equipment trolley

Wider context from the report

“3. A bronchoscope was not part of the standard anaesthetic equipment trolley and when one was sourced it had a suction button missing. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of a functional bronchoscope suction button

Wider context from the report

“3. A bronchoscope was not part of the standard anaesthetic equipment trolley and when one was sourced it had a suction button missing. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of previous medical records for clinical decision-making

Wider context from the report

“1. The deceased’s previous medical records were not available. Different clinical decisions might have been made had they been available. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide a rapid-tilt trolley for anaesthesia

Wider context from the report

“2. The deceased was anaesthetised on a ward bed and it would have helped if he had been on a trolley with rapid tilt. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to use NG tubes when clinically indicated

Wider context from the report

“4. Cricoid pressure and NG tubes were not used in this case. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review disposable bronchoscopy equipment and assess its efficacy for possible wider use in theatres.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. In the initial stages of aspiration, ‘blind’ endotracheal suction can often suffice to treat the presenting problem. It is only once the majority of the aspirate has been removed by this technique, that it is possible to perform bronchoscopy to attempt to remove further debris and wash out the lungs. Throughout the UK, bronchoscopes are not a standard piece of equipment on the ‘difficult airways trolley’. However, currently, our Critical Care areas are reviewing the use of disposable bronchoscopy equipment and once the efficacy of this relatively newly available equipment has been assessed as beneficial, we will further assess whether their use should be extended to being a standard piece of equipment in theatres.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 3 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure beds and trolleys have rapid-tilt facilities and keep a rapid-tilt trolley available for high-risk patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Following the investigation into the care provided to Mr Till (Root Cause Analysis), it was identified that a rapid tilting trolley may have assisted in treating Mr Till. Measures were taken at the time to ensure that rapid tilt trolley was on standby for those high risk patients. It is my understanding that all beds and trolleys have a rapid tilt facility for emergency situations. This information has been fed back to the Corporate Governance Team in order to take forward any training needs.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 3 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a fully electronic case-notes system to improve access to medical records.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The Trust is in the process of establishing a fully electronic case notes system, however, this is a planned programme over a number of years due to the scale and complexity of the requirements which also requires funding. Nevertheless, there are currently well established processes in place to access medical records for urgent admissions. All staff have access to the Trust ‘file-fast case-note tracking system’ to identify the location of the medical records and are able to request retrieval of the records thereafter. Some medical records are stored off site due to the practical difficulties of storing vast amounts of paper-based records.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 2 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present the evidence base on nasogastric tubes and formal risk assessment to clinicians and surgical teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that Mr Till’s case has already been presented at the departmental mortality and morbidity meeting however, following the inquest, the evidence base (as discussed above) will be presented to remind clinicians of the need to undertake a more formal risk assessment and to ensure that the surgical teams gave similarly considered the risk benefit for a nasogastric tube when booking cases for CEPOD (emergency) theatre.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 4 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Bronchoscopes are not generally standard difficult-airway-trolley equipment, and initial aspiration treatment can often use blind endotracheal suction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. In the initial stages of aspiration, ‘blind’ endotracheal suction can often suffice to treat the presenting problem. It is only once the majority of the aspirate has been removed by this technique, that it is possible to perform bronchoscopy to attempt to remove further debris and wash out the lungs. Throughout the UK, bronchoscopes are not a standard piece of equipment on the ‘difficult airways trolley’. However, currently, our Critical Care areas are reviewing the use of disposable bronchoscopy equipment and once the efficacy of this relatively newly available equipment has been assessed as beneficial, we will further assess whether their use should be extended to being a standard piece of equipment in theatres.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 3 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Whether to use cricoid pressure is determined by the treating anaesthetist according to individual airway and aspiration risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The decision to use cricoid pressure should therefore be based upon an assessment of the patient’s airway together with the risk factors for those difficult airway management situations. This should be considered together with the risk of aspiration against the evidence that repeated attempts at intubation, are associated with rapidly increasing risk of aspiration and that if a patient should vomit with cricoid pressure applied oesophageal rupture (leading to mediastinitis with a mortality of 13-100%) can occur.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 3 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Whether to place a nasogastric tube may be decided by the treating surgeon when emergency circumstances make placement inappropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b. The joint RCS/ASGBI emergency general surgery commissioning guidelines recommend placement and regular aspiration of nasogastric tubes in all patients with either large bowel or small bowel obstruction. However, this is a guideline only and a decision not to place a nasogastric tube can be taken by the treating surgeon in circumstances where they feel it would not be appropriate as outlined in evidence provided at the inquest.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 4 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Established tracking, retrieval and out-of-hours arrangements are considered sufficient for accessing medical records during urgent admissions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The Trust is in the process of establishing a fully electronic case notes system, however, this is a planned programme over a number of years due to the scale and complexity of the requirements which also requires funding. Nevertheless, there are currently well established processes in place to access medical records for urgent admissions. All staff have access to the Trust ‘file-fast case-note tracking system’ to identify the location of the medical records and are able to request retrieval of the records thereafter. Some medical records are stored off site due to the practical difficulties of storing vast amounts of paper-based records.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 2 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Evidence does not support routine cricoid pressure and indicates it may hinder airway management or increase risks in some circumstances.

Verbatim wording from the response

“a. Cricoid pressure - it was heard at the inquest that several published reviews of the research regarding cricoid pressure concluded that there is little evidence to support the widespread belief that it reduces the incidence of gastric aspiration. There is evidence to suggest that the use of cricoid pressure impedes the management of the airway both making mask ventilation more difficult and also laryngoscopy and intubation. There is also evidence that the application of cricoid pressure relaxes the lower oesophageal sphincter potentially making regurgitation and aspiration more likely.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 3 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing rapid-tilt facilities on beds and trolleys are considered sufficient for emergency situations involving high-risk patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Following the investigation into the care provided to Mr Till (Root Cause Analysis), it was identified that a rapid tilting trolley may have assisted in treating Mr Till. Measures were taken at the time to ensure that rapid tilt trolley was on standby for those high risk patients. It is my understanding that all beds and trolleys have a rapid tilt facility for emergency situations. This information has been fed back to the Corporate Governance Team in order to take forward any training needs.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 3 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Feed rapid-tilt trolley findings back to the Corporate Governance Team to address training needs.

    Stated by University Hospital of North Midlands NHS Trust (UHNMStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 March 2018.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Implementing fully electronic medical records immediately is constrained by the programme’s scale, complexity and funding requirements.

    Stated by University Hospital of North Midlands NHS Trust (UHNMUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Feed rapid-tilt trolley findings back to the Corporate Governance Team to address training needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Following the investigation into the care provided to Mr Till (Root Cause Analysis), it was identified that a rapid tilting trolley may have assisted in treating Mr Till. Measures were taken at the time to ensure that rapid tilt trolley was on standby for those high risk patients. It is my understanding that all beds and trolleys have a rapid tilt facility for emergency situations. This information has been fed back to the Corporate Governance Team in order to take forward any training needs.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 3 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implementing fully electronic medical records immediately is constrained by the programme’s scale, complexity and funding requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The Trust is in the process of establishing a fully electronic case notes system, however, this is a planned programme over a number of years due to the scale and complexity of the requirements which also requires funding. Nevertheless, there are currently well established processes in place to access medical records for urgent admissions. All staff have access to the Trust ‘file-fast case-note tracking system’ to identify the location of the medical records and are able to request retrieval of the records thereafter. Some medical records are stored off site due to the practical difficulties of storing vast amounts of paper-based records.”

Source location

2018-0013-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
Page 2 · response
Published 7 March 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026