PFD report

Corinne Haslam · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Jul 2023•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Emergency Department environments unsuitable for delivering care to patients experiencing severe and enduring mental illness
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency department care environments for people in mental health crisis
  2. Failure of electronic records systems to support transfer of clinical information between mental health and physical health specialists
    Part of recurring concern: Electronic patient records failing to make relevant clinical information available and actionablePart of recurring concern: Failure to reliably transfer medical records between healthcare organisations
  3. Lack of clear guidance for undertaking and repeating Venous Thromboembolism risk assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete clinical guidance for venous thromboembolism assessment and management
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Issues concerning Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust should be addressed in the Trust’s response.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Emergency Department environments unsuitable for delivering care to patients experiencing severe and enduring mental illness

Wider context from the report

“1. The court heard evidence as to the barriers which exist and make it difficult for staff working on mental health wards to obtain input from physical health specialists without sending a patient to hospital via the Emergency Department. Whilst there are occasions where review in an Emergency Department is most appropriate, the court also heard evidence that these can be extremely busy and intensive environments which may not be a conducive to delivering care for patients experiencing severe and enduring mental illness; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe emergency department care environments for people in mental health crisis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of electronic records systems to support transfer of clinical information between mental health and physical health specialists

Wider context from the report

“2. It is a matter of concern that Mental Health Trusts and Acute Trusts operate different (apparently incompatible) electronic records systems. The absence of such a unified records system creates obstacles as to the transfer of important clinical information between mental health and physical health specialists (and vice versa), with an inherent risk to patient safety arising from such information being held in silos. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Electronic patient records failing to make relevant clinical information available and actionable; Failure to reliably transfer medical records between healthcare organisations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear guidance for undertaking and repeating Venous Thromboembolism risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“3. It is a matter of concern that ward-based nursing staff do not appear to have been provided with clear and unambiguous guidance as to the circumstances when a risk assessment for Venous Thromboembolism (‘VTE’) should be undertaken following admission to a ward, and the circumstances in which such risk assessment should be repeated. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete clinical guidance for venous thromboembolism assessment and management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Barriers to obtaining physical health specialist input for mental health ward patients

Wider context from the report

“1. The court heard evidence as to the barriers which exist and make it difficult for staff working on mental health wards to obtain input from physical health specialists without sending a patient to hospital via the Emergency Department. Whilst there are occasions where review in an Emergency Department is most appropriate, the court also heard evidence that these can be extremely busy and intensive environments which may not be a conducive to delivering care for patients experiencing severe and enduring mental illness; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to physical health specialist input for mental health inpatients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issues concerning Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust should be addressed in the Trust’s response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note that you have also addressed matters of concern to the Chief Executive of Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust and I would expect the Trust’s response to address those issues.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 28 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Shared care records are considered a safe and secure way to bring together separate records from different health and care organisations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With regard to the compatibility of electronic patient records, a shared care record joins up information based on an individual rather than an organisation, and is a safe and secure way of bringing an individual’s separate records from different health and care organisations together.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 28 July 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026