PFD report

Xander Curran-Pass · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Jul 2019•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
10

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised10

  1. Lack of guidance on pethidine use with significant reduced fetal movement
  2. Inconsistent fundal-height measurement and recording
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable fundal-height measurement and recording
  3. Lack of national provision for sharing maternity induction-of-labour learning
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably disseminate contextualised safety learning to relevant staffPart of recurring concern: Unreliable dissemination of safety-critical clinical guidance and learning
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance on pethidine use with significant reduced fetal movement

Wider context from the report

“6. Xander's mother was given pethidine. There was no guidance on issues to be considered in terms of advisability of pethidine where there was already significant reduced fetal movement; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inconsistent fundal-height measurement and recording

Wider context from the report

“5.Xander had his fundal height measured by tape measure by midwives in the community. There was a significant discrepancy between the recorded measurements of two different midwives, which altered where he was on the centile chart significantly; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable fundal-height measurement and recording.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national provision for sharing maternity induction-of-labour learning

Wider context from the report

“1.The inquest was told that there was a growing challenge to maternity units from the rise in Induction of Labour and the pressure to ensure that timescales set out in NICE guidance were met. In this case and since the death of Xander the trust have taken steps to reconfigure their IOL process to reduce risk but no provision to share such learning nationally existed; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably disseminate contextualised safety learning to relevant staff; Unreliable dissemination of safety-critical clinical guidance and learning.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Poor quality of admission documentation

Wider context from the report

“7. The quality of documentation on admission was poor; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records; Unreliable completion of admission documentation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to require obstetrician review on admission with reduced fetal movement and delayed induction of labour

Wider context from the report

“4. A review by an obstetrician did not take place on admission despite RFM and delayed IOL. The trust guidance did not require such a review. Such a review may have identified growing concern about condition of Xander; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely medical review of admitted patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear guidance for managing a prolonged episode of reduced fetal movement

Wider context from the report

“2.In the inquest reference was made to the guidance from the Royal College on reduced fetal movement. The guidance references individual episodes of RFM but does not give clear guidance on the approach to be taken where in effect there is one prolonged episode rather than multiple episodes of RFM; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inconsistent and unclear diarising, prioritisation and management of induction of labour

Wider context from the report

“8. The triage and IOL diary were poorly kept and used in different ways by staff. The trust has since changed the way records are kept to ensure consistency and improved its audit process. It is unclear if nationally there is clarity on the way in which IOLs are diarised, prioritised and managed; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to closely observe a concerning cardiotocograph

Wider context from the report

“9. The CTG at 07.09 was concerning from the early stages but the evidence suggested that it was not closely observed; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide fetal monitoring when clinically required; Unreliable intrapartum CTG interpretation and escalation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review cardiotocography after induction of labour commenced

Wider context from the report

“10. The second CTG after IOL commenced was not reviewed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide fetal monitoring when clinically required.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to advise return to triage for further monitoring during ongoing reduced fetal movement

Wider context from the report

“3. Xander's mother was not told it would be advisable to return to triage for further monitoring in light of the ongoing reduced fetal movement. The inquest was told that this would have been advisable given the prolonged nature and the fact that it was unclear when she would be offered a slot for IOL; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.