PFD report

Christopher John Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Oct 2015•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to immediately establish responsibility for calling an ambulance
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance attendancePart of recurring concern: Failure to call an ambulance promptly when emergency assistance is requiredPart of recurring concern: Failure to dispatch emergency responders promptly to serious incidentsPart of recurring concern: Ineffective communication during medical emergencies
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to immediately establish responsibility for calling an ambulance

Wider context from the report

“1) It was clear from the evidence that there was a 12 minute delay in the police contacting the ambulance – the police were notified of the incident but did not contact North West Ambulance Service immediately. 2) In the circumstances of this Inquest I was satisfied that this delay had not had any relevance with regards to Christopher Smith’s death, given that the pathologist had concluded that his death was instantaneous. Any delay in the ambulance arriving was therefore not going to save his life. 3) However, it is perfectly possible to foresee circumstances where a delay in calling for an ambulance may have an effect on the outcome, where someone has jumped or fallen from a lesser distance. 4) I was told that the 12 minute delay was due to a breakdown in communication between Greater Manchester Police control room and the Motorway Control – Greater Manchester Police thought that the Motorway Control were contacting the ambulance and vice versa. 5) It seems to me that procedure should be in place whereby it is immediately established who is going to be responsible for calling the ambulance to avoid any delays, and the ambulance is called for at once. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance attendance; Failure to call an ambulance promptly when emergency assistance is required; Failure to dispatch emergency responders promptly to serious incidents; Ineffective communication during medical emergencies.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.