PFD report

Mr Geoffrey Jackson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Feb 2019•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to complete falls risk assessments in accordance with Trust requirements
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risks
  2. Absence of a requirement for structured narrative nursing records for each shift
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete falls risk assessments in accordance with Trust requirements

Wider context from the report

“1. Notwithstanding the actions which have been taken following the Trust’s investigation into the circumstances of Mr Jackson’s fall, a spot-check recently undertaken by the Matron on Ward 6 found 2 out of 32 patients had not had Risks of Falls Assessments completed in accordance with Trust requirements; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of a requirement for structured narrative nursing records for each shift

Wider context from the report

“2. A further matter of concern arose from the manner in which nursing records are made at Trafford General Hospital, with an emphasis on proforma care plans which simply require signing and dating by nurses, observation charts, and sheets upon which variance from the care plans can be recorded. It is a matter of concern that the absence of any requirement upon the nurse looking after a patient for a given shift to make a structured narrative record of what transpires over that period represents a missed opportunity to capture nuanced changes in a patient’s condition, and communicate these to others. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.